New
#30
Yes. I said pseudo-pirate, and I also explained my reasoning. DarkNovaGamer is right, the industry actually benefits from piracy in one way or another. It's free marketing. People would turn to free alternatives if nobody pirated. Like I said before, I played a pirated copy of Half-Life 2 when it came out in 2004, and ended up buying it and 5 other Valve games on Steam. Honest people can pirate too, it doesn't necessarily make you a criminal, ethically. Some people are savvy buyers and just want to know what they're spending their money on. Isn't it fair that you can test-drive a car before you buy it? So why not software? Time and labor went into both, and buying a car costs you more than buying a piece of software. Do you get what I mean?in accordance with the laws of reasoning; logically inferable; logical: a legitimate conclusion.
How long should this test period be to work for us consumers, to be fair? Windows 7 RC was for instance freely available over half a year for consumers to test, RTM is still available to test (Windows Enterprise 90 day trial), but still it's widely cracked and used illegally, so obliviously several months is not long enough test period.
We all have our opinions on Ileagle downloading, but to say it is the same as stealing a handbag or a car is just a joke IMO. Stealing a item means your taking it away from somebody else so you get it at the cost of somebody else. Downloading is just copying a bunch of 1's and 0's which means it is not getting taken from somebody who paid for it (aka a store or a person)
If you want to look at it the way Murdoch is then anybody who records a tv show or movie on HBO or showtime with there Tivo or equivalent is a criminal.
It's still better than not being able to test it at all. You can blame that on the industry, not the consumers. Our only interest is ensuring that our money is going to good use. Also, digital data can be infinitely copied, so it can't really be marked down as a loss.