Single SSD or two SSD's in RAID0?/Benchmark results

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. Posts : 207
    Windows XP Professional SP3/Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #1

    Single SSD or two SSD's in RAID0?/Benchmark results


    Hi, I just changed my system from 2 SSD's in RAID0 (Samsung 830 Series 256MB each) to a single SSD (Samsung 840 Pro 512MB). The reason I changed it is mainly because I need to encrypt the whole volume with Truecrypt which does not support RAID.
    I measured the performance in both configurations, here are the results:






    So what do these results say? I can't seem to tell the difference, I tried different applications and they open almost instantly in both cases. Boot time seems a bit faster with the single SSD (I guess that's because of the software RAID initializing at startup?).
    Last edited by Brink; 30 Sep 2013 at 18:32. Reason: fixed images
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #2

    antares said:
    ...Boot time seems a bit faster with the single SSD (I guess that's because of the software RAID initializing at startup?).
    Most likely. Many people don't realize that, despite impressive bench results, in real life, there is little to be gained when putting newer SSDs into RAID 0. Add to that reduced reliability; if one SSD dies, the whole array is lost and, since there is more than one SDD, the chance of failure increases with each added SSD. Still, I see people wanting to put several SSDs into RAID 0.

    RAID 0 made sense with slower spinners; the delay caused by the RAID initializing was negligible compared to the overall gain. SSDs, however, are so fast, any gain in speed will be smaller since the overhead delay stays the same and will offset a larger percentage of any gain from the RAID.

    Keep in mind a faster boot drive will decrease only boot time and program loading. If you have a program that takes one or two seconds to load with one SSD, cutting that down to 1/2 to one second just isn't going to be particularly noticeable.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 2,497
    Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
       #3

    In any computer system there will always be a bottleneck, something that is limiting some aspect of performance than any other. Upgrading that something will not eliminate the bottleneck but simply move it elsewhere. Typically the component limiting boot and application load times will be a slow conventional drive. Upgrading to an SSD either eliminated or greatly reduced the influence of disk performance nfor this aspect of performance. But you can't expect that further improvements in SSD speed will noticeably improve performance. It has ceased being the bottleneck.

    RAID 0 can produce some impressive benchmarks, one of the most noticeable being the sequential read times. That is the time for reading large blocks from large files. But that doesn't happen very often in the real world where small reads are more typical. Here the performance of RAID 0 is more modest.

    System performance is a complex thing with multiple factors involved. Upgrading one component often doesn't provide the performance that the benchmarks might imply.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #4

    Here's a single 840EVO with Rapid Mode enabled.

    Single SSD or two SSD's in RAID0?/Benchmark results-ssd-840-evo.png
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 207
    Windows XP Professional SP3/Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Thread Starter
       #5

    Amazing benchmarks Britton! Congrats!!. I downloaded Samsung Magician software and set it to "Performance" before posting my benchmark. The Rapid Mode is not yet supported for the Pro version, only for the EVO, however it seems it's coming later this year for the Pro too.
    Last edited by antares; 30 Sep 2013 at 00:50.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #6

    Thanks Antares, I got the EVO just to try out the RAPID mode. Hopefully Samsung gets busy with the Pro version, the year is nearly over.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 207
    Windows XP Professional SP3/Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Thread Starter
       #7

    hi Britton, benchmark aside, can you feel a performance difference in Rapid Mode compared to standard mode? Is the difference subtle or big?
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #8

    No I don't notice any speed gain. It is in the testing phase though so I don't yet have resource heavy software, like Photoshop and Corel Draw installed. I think it's like overclocking, there's no performance gain but gives good benchmark numbers to brag about.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #9

    From what I've read, it uses system RAM to cache the SSD, similar in effect to RAID 0.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #10

    YEs it uses up to 1GB of RAM and plans are to make it adjustable to use more.
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:55.
Find Us