2 Computers computer A) with Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz gives WEI cpu of 7.4 )not bad for a "slightly" hobbled QUAD -. The "Hobbling" is the 6MB L2 Cache which makes it slightly cheaper than 12MB Cache which the Q9450 (I think that was the model) had. This machine has 8GB RAM installed.
b) Computer B with 16GB RAM installed and a "Beefier" CPU (not that computer A is any slouch) INTEL I7-920 processor 2.66GHZ 8MB Cache) only gives WEI of 7.0
Can't understand this but the "Significantly" cheaper processor (Q9400) seems according to Windows yield a better performance.
This HAS to be B/S
Similar DDR2 Memory etc.
Could be Mobo differences but a CPU test is a CPU test -- should be executing CPU instructions "Natively".
If this test is highly dependent on the MOBO then it's a total waste of time and confusing to say the least.
Any "Techie insider" have an idea as to EXACTLY what is being tested here.
Thanks in advanced from a very confused
Jimbo
My Computer
At a glance
Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and se...Intel i7 Intel i58GB, 16GBOn Motherboard
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom built, several laptops HP/ASUS
OS
Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
Which one do you actually feel performs better out of the two?
Also maybe try taking out some the RAM on the i7 setup, I think I saw someone else post about how he was experiencing lower scores with more RAM for some weird reason.
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 Ultimate Vista Ultimate x64Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16Ghz @ 3.8Ghz2x2Gigs Patriot PC2-6400 LLInno3D GeForce GTX260 216 SP
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Home Brew
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate Vista Ultimate x64
CPU
Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16Ghz @ 3.8Ghz
Motherboard
eVGA 750i FTW
Memory
2x2Gigs Patriot PC2-6400 LL
Graphics Card(s)
Inno3D GeForce GTX260 216 SP
Monitor(s) Displays
ASUS VW222U 22" 2ms Response time
Screen Resolution
1680x1050
Hard Drives
SATA 150GB
SATA II 250GB
USB IDE 750GB Ext.
PSU
HYTEC 600W & Thermaltake 650W Toughpower Power Exp
Which is why I take WEI scores with a pinch of salt
As a comparison, my i7 920 scores 7.6, but there are lots of factors that can effect this, motherboard quality, overclocking, memory throughput, and as Mr GRiM just stated, bloating ones system with far too much RAM
A score of 7.0 ain't bad if your on 'stock' settings though.
Which one do you actually feel performs better out of the two?
Also maybe try taking out some the RAM on the i7 setup, I think I saw someone else post about how he was experiencing lower scores with more RAM for some weird reason.
Both seem quite fast enough for my purposes -- at this type of performance for what I usually do it's not an issue -- but I just get confused by "inaccurate" or misleading data.
I shouldn't also have to REMOVE RAM. I run a load of Virtual machines / Virtual servers -- every SINGLE BYTE of RAM is needed for these .
I'm not overclocking either of these CPU's - both running also on "Default BIOS" settings which does enable VT etc.
I don't bother with the WEI in any case for "Optimising" / tweaking a machine but it's just interesting to know how MS would calculate the "CPU" index and come up with a lower "Index" for a higher power CPU.
Cheers
jimbo
My Computer
At a glance
Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and se...Intel i7 Intel i58GB, 16GBOn Motherboard
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom built, several laptops HP/ASUS
OS
Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
Thermaltake Theron (Highly Recommended) + Razer Imperator
Antivirus
MSE
Browser
IE, FF, WaterFox
Other Info
GT Extreme V2 Sim Racing Cockpit + 40" LCD and K/B Mouse stand ▼
Fanatec CSR Elite Wheel + Clubsport V1 Pedals + CSR shifter/7G-H ▼Saitek X52 Pro ▼ TrackIR 5 Pro
Buttkicker v2 Seat Rumbler with Dedicated 5.1 and Sub Woofer attached to frame ▼
=
Bloody Big Grin