7127 hitting the NG's

[Bumpus]

Someones posting both x64 and x86 to a.b.c

...no props to se7en or jnetty99 in the headers.

There are a few .nl & .de in the posters details...which always say "be Careful!"

I think I'll d/l it anyway and compare hashes to thursday nites version.

 

[jfar]

Someones posting both x64 and x86 to a.b.c

...no props to se7en or jnetty99 in the headers.

There are a few .nl & .de in the posters details...which always say "be Careful!"

I think I'll d/l it anyway and compare hashes to thursday nites version.

Can you decipher that message for me please,because I can't understand it ,thanks.

 

[Bumpus]

7127 is being posted to the newsgroups.
a.b.c is the abbr for the specific newsgroup.

 

[12eason]

Someones posting both x64 and x86 to a.b.c

...no props to se7en or jnetty99 in the headers.

There are a few .nl & .de in the posters details...which always say "be Careful!"

I think I'll d/l it anyway and compare hashes to thursday nites version.

It was posted on a.b.boneless 26 hours ago...

 

[Bumpus]

It was posted on a.b.boneless 26 hours ago...

Under what name.
I searched back thru 5-13 and didn't see anything listed in a.b.b.

 

[12eason]

Just search for 7127 on binsearch.

 

[Bumpus]

Just search for 7127 on binsearch.

lookie there...just like you said, 12eason. Thanks.
It still doesn't show up using my news provider. I'm gonna have to use newsbin from now on to do searches. (I think mines good for retention tho...just the search part may not be so good.)

 

[12eason]

Yeah, binsearch is pretty good, the advanced search feature especially. But it misses the odd collection. That's where Newzbin tends to beat it.

 

[Captain Zero]

They're a little slow on this one. The RC hit within a couple of hours.

 

[Jon55]

So can anyone confirm or deny the rumors of 7127 being faster than the RC?

 

[Sempie]

slower on an asus eee 1000h the boot time went up from 63 seconds to 79 seconds , overall i think it is still the same

 

[Paul80]

Why is this not available through Microsoft ?

 

[nate42nd]

The same reason all of the beta versions were not available through MS. They are just stepping stones on the way to RTM. MS want's what they know to be stable for release. They don't want to let us download stuff when programmers are trying to fix bugs. It's not much better....and faster? No I don't think so. I am running both on 2 different PCs with different specs but see no difference in speed. I have played with almost all beta builds. Placebo effect is all it is. Stick with the RC from MS.

 

[Chris123NT]

The same reason all of the beta versions were not available through MS. They are just stepping stones on the way to RTM. MS want's what they know to be stable for release. They don't want to let us download stuff when programmers are trying to fix bugs. It's not much better....and faster? No I don't think so. I am running both on 2 different PCs with different specs but see no difference in speed. I have played with almost all beta builds. Placebo effect is all it is. Stick with the RC from MS.

If people want to try new builds they are free to do so. Obviously you wish to stay with RC and that's fine, but don't turn people away from something. If they want to try it, let them.