AHCI or IDE For Mechanical HDD ?

Auld Bint

New member
Member
Local time
9:42 AM
Messages
72
Hi,

Is there any real noticable benefit from having a SATA mechanical HDD use AHCI or IDE? Also, if there is any benefit, is it related to the rpm speed that the drive is capable of?

I keep reading conflicting reports on this, some say AHCI is best, others say there is no real difference unless the disk is an SSD.

I am about to do a clean install of Windows 7 on a laptop 5400rpm mechanical HDD so thought I may as well set the mode before proceeding with the install.


Rgds
Auld Bint
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Window 7
OS
Window 7
I never noticed any performance difference between the two modes myself. The 2 main advantages of AHCI over IDE though are hot swap and NCQ (if the drive supports NCQ).

Hot swap means you can replace the drive or unplug the device from the computer without rebooting. NCQ (Native Command Queuing) allows drives to accept more than one command at a time and dynamically reorder them for maximum read write efficiency. But NCQ is only a benefit if you are running very intensive disk operations which may not be the case for the average home user.

Practically speaking, use AHCI if your hardware supports it, as it can only enable features of your drive to be accessed. It should be the same or faster than IDE, unless you have a very bad sata controller chipset or something. Also I think some of the first SATA drives supporting some features like NCQ actually did better with them disabled, but I think that is no longer the case.

Yoy can also go through this thread.

http://www.sevenforums.com/installa...ge-ide-ahci-bios-much-better-performance.html
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 x64 pro/ Windows 7 x86 Pro/ XP SP3 x86
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Too many to describe...
OS
Windows 7 x64 pro/ Windows 7 x86 Pro/ XP SP3 x86
It's something that I think you need to try and test for yourself.

For example, a while back I went without AHCI because with my mobo, turning on AHCI introduced an 8 second delay at boot that I didn't feel that I could earn back throughout the day of using the computer...so overall I felt slower with AHCI.

However, after a BIOS update....my 8 second delay dropped to about 1.5 seconds and therefore, I felt that the slight edge of AHCI might now be worth it.

Either way, with our without led to barely if any perceivable difference. Benchmarks are sometimes pretty dramatic...but they often don't really quantify real world performance. I base whether or not a change made a difference with a stopwatch and doing some timed averages. That's what matters to me.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Ultimate x64Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timingsEVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self-Built in July 2009
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS
Memory
8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570
Sound Card
Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio
Monitor(s) Displays
23" Acer x233H
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS
PSU
Corsair 620HX modular
Case
Antec P182
Cooling
stock
Keyboard
ABS M1 Mechanical
Mouse
Logitech G9 Laser Mouse
Internet Speed
15/2 cable modem
Other Info
Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset.
Back
Top