JMH
Banned
- Local time
- 11:11 PM
- Messages
- 6,448
Source --“Common sense always speaks too late.” — Raymond Chandler
A new study about the (in)efficacy of anti-virus software in detecting the latest malware threats is a much-needed reminder that staying safe online is more about using your head than finding the right mix or brand of security software.
Last week, security software testing firm NSS Labs completed another controversial test of how the major anti-virus products fared in detecting malware pushed by malicious Web sites: Most of the products took an average of more than 45 hours — nearly two days — to detect the latest threats.
The two graphs below show the performance of the commercial versions of 10 top anti-virus products. NSS permitted the publication of these graphics without the legend showing how to track the performance of each product, in part because they are selling this information, but also because — as NSS President Rick Moy told me — they don’t want to become an advertisement for any one anti-virus company.
Anti-virus is a Poor Substitute for Common Sense — Krebs on Security
My Computer
At a glance
Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit. SP1.Intel i7 -720QM.[1.6GHz Turbo Boost 2.8GHz. 6...8 DDR 3 RAM. 1066MHZATI 1024 MB. DDR3. Radeon HD5650
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- LAPTOP. HP Pavilion dv7-4010TX .
- OS
- Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit. SP1.
- CPU
- Intel i7 -720QM.[1.6GHz Turbo Boost 2.8GHz. 6MB Cache.]
- Memory
- 8 DDR 3 RAM. 1066MHZ
- Graphics Card(s)
- ATI 1024 MB. DDR3. Radeon HD5650
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 17.3" High Definition Brightview LCD. LED Backlit.
- Screen Resolution
- 1600 x 900.
- Hard Drives
- 640GB
- Case
- Laptop / notebook.
- Mouse
- Logitech Anywhere mouse. MX.
- Internet Speed
- ADSL [ but too slow ]
