AV-Comparatives - Performance Test Anti-Virus - December 2011
- Thread starter anitac
- Start date
After the recent scam, I no more believe in such tests.
My Computer
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Samsung NP530U4B-S02IN
- OS
- Windows® 8 Pro (64-bit)
- CPU
- Intel® Core™ i5 Processor 2467M (1.60GHz, 3MB L3 Cache)
- Motherboard
- Samsung Electronics
- Memory
- 6GB DDR3 System Memory at 1,333MHz (on BD 4GB + 2GB x 1)
- Graphics Card(s)
- AMD Radeon™ HD7550M 1GB DDR3 (Ext. Graphic)
- Sound Card
- Realtek High Definition Audio
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 35.56cm (14.0) SuperBright 300nit HD LED Display
- Screen Resolution
- 1366x768
- Hard Drives
- 1TB S-ATA II Hard Drive (5400RPM) with ExpressCache 16GB SSD
- Internet Speed
- sucks
- Antivirus
- Microsoft Security Essentials
- Browser
- Google Chrome (Sync enabled)
It's actually a sad state of affairs, one way or another.
Either the tests are not without prejudice, or those who doubt the results are playing a funny game.
What can you still believe??
Isn't it time that e.g. the National Institute of Standards and Technology (the old National Bureau of Standards) starts getting involved?
Either the tests are not without prejudice, or those who doubt the results are playing a funny game.
What can you still believe??
Isn't it time that e.g. the National Institute of Standards and Technology (the old National Bureau of Standards) starts getting involved?
My Computer
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Acer Extensa 5235
- OS
- Windows 7 Home Premium 32bit, Linux Mint Julia, in dual boot mode
- CPU
- Intel Celeron 900 @2.2 GHz
- Motherboard
- Acer BA50-MV(U2E1)
- Memory
- DDR3 2048 Mbytes
- Sound Card
- Conexant HD Audio
