Can you belive this image is not Photoshopped?

[netadict]

I found this photo on one of these websites that claim they have a collection of amazing images that are not Photoshopped. In other words the photographer splashed water on the model and was able to shoot the photo at EXACTLY the right time while the water formed her dress and wings. Do you buy this?

 

[JaidynM]

I wouldn't think it is. The bottom layer of water is splashing down while the top half of the water is going upwards.

 

[sk0t0s]

It is possible... just ask the photographers how many shots they made and how many buckets of water they splashed to the subject before getting the result they wanted.

 

[Starbeetle]

Phenomenous!

 

[whs]

Hmm, who needs the water.

 

[solarmystic]

I'm feeling rather thirsty all of a sudden.

 

[Starbeetle]

I'm feeling rather thirsty all of a sudden.

Me too

 

[netadict]

JaidynM, you are amazing!! I hadn't realized or thought of the direction of the water splash until I read your post.



Thirsty wouldn't be accurate. In this summer heat I'd like somebody to splash a bucket of water on me.

 

[SmurofNeves]

Its lies...:huh:

 

[techpro]

Looking at the detail of the 2 wings I have doubts, but it very well could be the real deal.

 

[The Howling Wolves]

I have an extra towel to dry her off!

 

[Trucidation]

They said no photoshop... but they didn't say multiple cameras (or maybe even video), then choosing one particular outstanding shot out of the scores of candidates.

Reminds me of those "you're on candid camera!" submissions where they said it took 34 takes to get that perfect shot of someone tripping over a rake and falling into a barrel...

 

[smarteyeball]

Do you buy this?

Yep.

The assistants kept throwing water at the model until he got the right shot.

 

[netadict]

Trucidation, to continue on your line of thought, yes they said no photoshop but they did not say no Gimp or any other photo processing software.

smarteyeball you said "The assistants kept throwing water at the model until he got the right shot", I guess you mean they kept on throwing water for 5 weks till they got it

 

[smarteyeball]

Trucidation, to continue on your line of thought, yes they said no photoshop but they did not say no Gimp or any other photo processing software.

I guess that's implied

smarteyeball you said "The assistants kept throwing water at the model until he got the right shot", I guess you mean they kept on throwing water for 5 weks till they got it

lol. I doubt that it took 5 weeks of throwing water at her (It'd be hilarious if they did though) - But it's conceivable that over the course of the photo shoot (probably a few hours) that he got that shot.

Undoubtedly it took a few buckets though

 

[Trucidation]

Ooh, ooh, I know, maybe it's not even water, but some kind of jell, and they spent a few hours sculpting it around the girl.

Shenanigans, I tell you.

 

[smarteyeball]

Or maybe the chicks shower is just broken...

 

[netadict]

Or maybe IT IS Photoshopped and they lied

 

[smarteyeball]

No mate - I think you just have to accept it is possible to capture amazing images without resorting to apps.

 

[Tekno Venus]

I wouldn't think it is. The bottom layer of water is splashing down while the top half of the water is going upwards.

The only way that could have possibly happened was two or more buckets being thrown at exactly the same time. This has definitely been manipulated IMO. It just seems to lucky to get that shot. They might have done, but it is so unlikely. They must have used Paintshop Pro! That's how it got on the site!