Solved Core 2 CPU Performance

AL7HH

New member
Local time
3:26 AM
Messages
1
Location
Irving, Texas
I currently have an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, clock 3.000 GHz, 6M cache. I am contemplating buying an Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300, clock 2.5 GHz, 6M cache. Both CPUs have a 1333 GHz bus speed. Many CPU performance sites rate the Quad as being considerably faster, despite the lower clock frequency. I would like your opinion on this. Thank you.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
custom build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Motherboard
Asus P5K-E
Memory
DDR2 8GB
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Hard Drives
Kingston SH103S3240G
Antivirus
ESET NOD 32 Antivirus 8
Browser
Internet Explorer 11
ARK | Compare Intel® Products

Neither has Hyper-Threading but comparing brut processing power;
4 x 2.5GHz = 10
2 x 3.0GHz = 6

The Quad Core gives a 67% increase in processing power. On the flip side, it's eight year old technology. :(

What is the PC used for?
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Built 2/11/2011
OS
Windows 7 Pro-x64
CPU
i7-2600 3.4GHz - 3.8GHz Turbo
Motherboard
Intel DH67BL-B3
Memory
8Gb - 2x4GB, Muskin 991770 PC3-1333
Graphics Card(s)
Integrated Intel HD 2000
Sound Card
Integrated Intel 10.1 HD, RealTek ALC892
Monitor(s) Displays
Asus LCD VH222H, Haier HL24XSL2a
Screen Resolution
1920x1080, 1920x1080
Hard Drives
Crucial SSD C300-128Gb,
Western Digital WD5002AALX - 500Gb,
Western Digital WD7501AALS - 750Gb
PSU
Seasonic 650W 80+ Gold Modular
Case
Rosewill Defender
Cooling
Stock CPU, Four 120mm case fans, PCH fan added
Keyboard
Logitech EX100 Y-RBH94 Wireless
Mouse
Logitech EX100 M-RCE95 Wireless
Internet Speed
3.0/1.5 Mbs
Antivirus
Microsoft Security Essentials
Browser
Microsoft Internet Explorer 11
Other Info
Antec Veris Premier-Multimedia IR Station,
Cyber Accoustics-3602 Speakers,
AFT XM-5U Card Reader,
Hauppauge TV-HVR-2250,
Sony LX300 USB Turntable

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Skylake Special #666
OS
Windows 10 Pro x64
CPU
Intel Core i7 6700K
Motherboard
Asus Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1
Memory
GSkill TridentZ RGB 16GB 3600 16-16-16-36
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC x2
Sound Card
Realtek High Definition
Monitor(s) Displays
AOC G2460PG
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 144Hz
Hard Drives
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB x2
PSU
EVGA 1000 P2, EVGA White Custom Braided Cables
Case
Corsair Vengeance C70 Gunmetal Black
Cooling
Corsair H100i v2, Corsair ML120 x2, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Keyboard
Logitech G910 Orion Spectrum
Mouse
Logitech G700s
Internet Speed
Verizon Fios Quantum Gateway 75/75
Antivirus
Windows Defender, Malwarebytes Free 3.8.3
Browser
Chrome
Other Info
Corsair SP120 x4, LG Blu-ray Drive, Durabrand HT-395 100 Watt Dolby Digital Amp, Corsair H2100 Wireless 7.1 Headset
I would say performance would be affected by how many cores your apps/games are using. If limited to 1-2 cores, your old CPU should over-perform.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
CPU
AMD Phenom 2 1090T
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5
Memory
2x8GB Kingston HyperX Fury Black 1600Mhz Unganged
Graphics Card(s)
MSI GTX 970 Gaming 4G
Sound Card
Realtek On-Board HD 7.1 Audio / Logitech G35
Monitor(s) Displays
3xAcer GD245HQ
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB SSD - OS /
WD Caviar Black SATA 3 - 1 TBx2 - Dynamic RAID 0 /
WD Caviar Green SATA 2 - 640GBx2 - Dynamic RAID 0 /
WD Caviar Green SATA 2 - 640GB - Internal Backup /
Seagate Barracude SATA 3 - 3TB - External Backup/ Sync
PSU
HighPower 1000W
Case
Cooler Master HAF 932
Cooling
Noctua NH-D14
Keyboard
Logitech G19
Mouse
Logitech G500
Internet Speed
100/4 Mbit Cable (100GB quota)
Antivirus
ZoneAlarm Extreme Security / MBAM Pro / MBAE Free / SAS Free
Browser
IE 11 - Firefox - Chrome
Other Info
Logitech F710/ G27/ G940/ Z5500 // TrackIR 5 // Nvidia 3D Surround Vision
I have done almost exactly what you propose, I went from a Core 2 Duo E8500 (3.1 GHz) to a Core 2 Quad X9650 (3.0 GHz).

If your most commonly used applications utilize only 1 or 2 threads, you will see an overall slowdown at the stock speed (2.5 GHz) of the Q9300.

However, if your application uses all available threads, you should see a speed increase.

I agree with AddRAM, go for the Q9650 or QX9650 (the only difference being that the Extreme version is unlocked for easy OverClocking) if your motherboard can handle it. Either are available on Ebay, but be aware that they still carry a bit of a premium price despite their age.

I ran the X9650 (overclocked to 3.8 GHz) for a year or so before succumbing to the siren song of the Haswell-E :)

In summary, it depends a lot on what applications you are running as to whether you'll realize a net increase in performance by going with the Q9300.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium x64
CPU
Intel Core i7 5960X @3.0 GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force
Memory
4 x 4 GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 DDR4-2400
Graphics Card(s)
PNY GTX 780
Sound Card
Realtek on-board ALC1150
Monitor(s) Displays
HP Z30i + Asus PA246Q + Dell U2412M
Screen Resolution
2560x1600 + 1920x1200 + 1920x1200
Hard Drives
Samsung 830 256GB
PSU
Antec EarthWatts 650W
Case
Cooler Master HAF 932
Cooling
Corsair Hydro Series H105
Keyboard
Razer BlackWidow Tournament Edition Stealth
Mouse
Razer Naga
I would stay with the 3GHz duo core. I have a Q6600 @ 2.4GHz on this system and I am not impressed. At the end of the day it is a 2.4GHz duo core because most programs do not use all 4 cores.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops
OS
Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
CPU
from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
Monitor(s) Displays
2x HP w2207
Hard Drives
5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals
Keyboard
with trackball - no mices
Mouse
Trackball mice
Internet Speed
DSL 6000
Back
Top