Is the Intel 530 SSD worth buying for a two and half year old laptop?

jonnyhillow

Banned
Local time
12:37 PM
Messages
637
Location
NJ native & NC
I keep reading it's mediocre in performance compared to many others and i can't afford the 700 series, right now i just have a 5400 rpm hard drive that came with the laptop.

I know Samsung is popular as well , is it superior to the Intel?

Thanks folks
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 ...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz6.00 GBIntel(R) HD Graphics 3000
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Asus laptop U56E
OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 Multiprocessor Free Service Pack 1
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz
Motherboard
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. U56E
Memory
6.00 GB
Graphics Card(s)
Intel(R) HD Graphics 3000
Sound Card
(1) High Definition Audio Device (2) High Definition Audio
Screen Resolution
1366 x 768 x 32 bits (4294967296 colors) @ 60 Hz
Hard Drives
WDC WD6400BPVT-80HXZT3
Any SSD will be a massive improvement over the HDD. You won't notice much difference in performance if you buy a top of the range model or a cheap one other than benchmarks.

The Samsung Evo's seem to be the hot drive at the moment that won't break the bank. I recently got a 250GB one myself and know many other people that are very happy with them.

Paul.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
OS
Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
Thanks , but i don't understand what you mean by " i won't notice much of a difference other than benchmarks " .

Aren't benchmarks what measure performance ?
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 ...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz6.00 GBIntel(R) HD Graphics 3000
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Asus laptop U56E
OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 Multiprocessor Free Service Pack 1
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz
Motherboard
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. U56E
Memory
6.00 GB
Graphics Card(s)
Intel(R) HD Graphics 3000
Sound Card
(1) High Definition Audio Device (2) High Definition Audio
Screen Resolution
1366 x 768 x 32 bits (4294967296 colors) @ 60 Hz
Hard Drives
WDC WD6400BPVT-80HXZT3
They measure performance yes, but in real world use the speed/performance difference between most modern SSD's is not something that would be noticed by the user.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
OS
Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
Thanks , but i don't understand what you mean by " i won't notice much of a difference other than benchmarks " .

Aren't benchmarks what measure performance ?

He means that if you did not know what SSD you owned, it's not likely you could tell by using the PC.

SSDs are "fast" because of their access times. The access times of any of them are much much faster than an HDD. Particularly a 5400 rpm laptop drive.

Some folks can't past the benchmark idea for the same reason some folks will always buy a "200 watt" stereo system rather than a 100 watt system. Or a 800 watt power supply rather than a 500 watt power supply.

Intel drive are highly reliable and come with a good management toolbox. It's up to you to decide if that compensates for any shortcomings you find in benchmarks. If all you care about is benchmarks, you won't buy Intel. If your sole gauge of "superiority" is benchmarks, you won't buy Intel.

Crucial's are another good brand to look at--the MX100.

You should understand that SSDs are not a cure-all. If your laptop is "slow", it will remain slow in many respects, even with the SSD. Some people expect night and day differences and are then disappointed. But the disappointment would still be there regardless of what SSD they bought.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Home Premium SP1, 64-bitIntel Skylake i5-6600K, not overclocked8 GB HyperX DDR4-2666 (2 x 4 GB)none; graphics are integrated on CPU
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Ignatz Special; 4 speed manual gearbox; factory air conditioning; one of one
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium SP1, 64-bit
CPU
Intel Skylake i5-6600K, not overclocked
Motherboard
AsRock Z170M Extreme 4, micro ATX
Memory
8 GB HyperX DDR4-2666 (2 x 4 GB)
Graphics Card(s)
none; graphics are integrated on CPU
Sound Card
onboard: Realtek ALC1150; external: USB Behringer UF0-202
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell S2340M 23 inch IPS
Screen Resolution
1600 x 900
Hard Drives
System: Crucial MX100 series SSD, 128 GB;
Data: Samsung Spinpoint 103SJ, 1 TB;
Backup: WD Caviar Green WD30EZRX-00D8PB0, 3 TB
PSU
Rosewill SilentNight 500 watt fanless, semi-modular
Case
Antec Solo II
Cooling
Noctua NH-U12S; Noctua F12 intake, Noctua S12A exhaust
Keyboard
Microsoft 200 6JH-00001 USB
Mouse
Dell or Microsoft optical wired; USB
Antivirus
Microsoft Security Essentials and Malwarebytes Premium
Browser
Pale Moon
Other Info
All fans PWM; speeds at idle: CPU circa 500 rpm; intake circa 600 rpm; exhaust circa 600 rpm; CPU temps 27 idle and 47 C load in a warm room (27 C/81 F) when running Intel Extreme Tuning Utility stress test.
Thanks , but i don't understand what you mean by " i won't notice much of a difference other than benchmarks " .

Aren't benchmarks what measure performance ?

He means that if you did not know what SSD you owned, it's not likely you could tell by using the PC.

SSDs are "fast" because of their access times. The access times of any of them are much much faster than an HDD.

Some folks can't past the benchmark idea for the same reason some folks will always buy a "200 watt" stereo system rather than a 100 watt system. Or a 800 watt power supply rather than a 500 watt power supply.

Intel drive are highly reliable and come with a good management toolbox. It's up to you to decide if that compensates for any shortcomings you find in benchmarks. If all you care about is benchmarks, you won't buy Intel. If your sole gauge of "superiority" is benchmarks, you won't buy Intel.

Crucial's are another good brand to look at--the MX100.


Yeah MX100 looks like a good buy, I nearly got one but saw the Samsung Evo for 8GBP more and figured it was worth it based on how highly people rated them. I must admit the software it came with to transfer the OS was awesome. I clicked a couple of buttons and my OS was transferred in no time. Obviously this would only work if the data on the original drive was smaller than the new drive and this was the case for me.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
OS
Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
Well i got the Intel 240 GB 530 for a little over $100.00 and i literally have nothing on my 5400 drive that the laptop came with and it seems fast as it is .

Since nearly everybody raves about SSD's and the performance gains i decided to give one a try , i have yet to read any reviews anywhere even on slow systems that the person didn't say their machine wasn't transformed so i don't get what you mean by "if the laptop is slow it will remain slow comment" .


Seems the exact opposite actually.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 ...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz6.00 GBIntel(R) HD Graphics 3000
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Asus laptop U56E
OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 Multiprocessor Free Service Pack 1
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz
Motherboard
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. U56E
Memory
6.00 GB
Graphics Card(s)
Intel(R) HD Graphics 3000
Sound Card
(1) High Definition Audio Device (2) High Definition Audio
Screen Resolution
1366 x 768 x 32 bits (4294967296 colors) @ 60 Hz
Hard Drives
WDC WD6400BPVT-80HXZT3
Back
Top