RC Upgrade ran better & used less HD than Clean Install

Kweeveen

New member
Local time
12:59 AM
Messages
7
Location
New York
I first did a Vista Premium upgrade to Win 7 RC. Loved it. No conflicts...even XP legacy software ran well (unlike with Vista). Didn't even need compatibility mode. Then I thought I'd try a clean install. Install went smoothly, but than my HP C4280 choked a few times before it installed. I anticipated that. Upgrades tend to "accomodate" pre-existing software, but not so with clean install. That scenario tends to include untested drivers which Win installs by default - fair enough. My legacy apps still run well though. Flash didn't think my OS wasn't compatible and refused to install untill I tricked it into installing at the Adobe Flash test page. Now that the dust has settled - runs great. Even my ESET (NOD 32) security suite runs great. Big question for me is Why does my clean istall use more HD space than the upgrade install. Weird?
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 RC
OS
Windows 7 RC
My upgrade and clean install both used around 10.6 GB or so. I am not sure why yours were different.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 RC (Build 7100)AMD Athlon XP 2400+1.25 GBATI Radeon
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Home-Built and has been slowly upgraded since 1999
OS
Windows 7 RC (Build 7100)
CPU
AMD Athlon XP 2400+
Motherboard
ECS L7S7A2
Memory
1.25 GB
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon
Sound Card
SoundBlaster Live! Platinum (w/ Live! Drive)
Monitor(s) Displays
ViewSonic 19" LCD
Screen Resolution
1440x900
Hard Drives
320GB PATA
250GB external USB Backup
PSU
500W
Case
Generic Beige Box
Cooling
A bunch of Fans
Keyboard
Old one with the keys pried off that I don't use
Mouse
Microsoft Optical Mouse I found at Unclaimed baggage for $10
Internet Speed
Knology Cable Internet (~6-7Mbps)
Back
Top