Show us your Unigine Heaven benchmark scores!

[Maguscreed]

Mine just says it's an intel, it's actually a gtx580.
Which is what explains my scoring.

 

[chev65]

Not bad for an old relic. :sarc:

 

[chromatica]

Meh.

 

[Alsisgevat]

Mine on full

 

[Maguscreed]

I don't know this benchmark seems about useless. all you have to do is leave dx11 on and you can score ridiculous numbers just because you dump resolution.
case in point below. Granted I have a decent setup here, but even so I can make my number swing wildly by thousands, that just doesn't seem right.
I should also note that even in this run the min fps is still being generated by their transitions and not by the actual test which is messed up as well.

and the funniest thing is it's gone from listing my gtx580 as a intel integrated to listing it as a unknown 256mb card. It's obviously wrong on both counts.
I opened up the case and looked just to be sure :sarc:

 

[Solarstarshines]

I don't know this benchmark seems about useless. all you have to do is leave dx11 on and you can score ridiculous numbers just because you dump resolution.
case in point below. Granted I have a decent setup here, but even so I can make my number swing wildly by thousands, that just doesn't seem right.
I should also note that even in this run the min fps is still being generated by their transitions and not by the actual test which is messed up as well.

and the funniest thing is it's gone from listing my gtx580 as a intel integrated to listing it as a unknown 256mb card. It's obviously wrong on both counts.
I opened up the case and looked just to be sure :sarc:

very Impressive have to say

But i noticed your settings are different then others the shaders are lower not at high like everyone else

 

[Alsisgevat]

Maguscreed - I couldn't resist re benching mine after seeing how high one can score when turning everything off, I ran the bench with it all off and lowest settings, and the difference in my score at all on and all off is over 5000 haha (1679 on all Highest settings vs 6417 on lowest settings haha)

 

[Maguscreed]

That's what I'm saying the score takes absolutely nothing into account apparently except the raw number of frames rendered throughout the test
Which makes the result fairly meaningless.
Unless absolutely everyone is using all identical settings... which we obviously aren't.

My first result up top was this same system with all the benchmark settings actually cranked.

 

[windude99]

Keep the scores coming! I wander why mine is so low compared to yours. I have a Radeon HD 5670 512mb.

 

[Maguscreed]

Keep the scores soming! I wander why mine is so low compared to yours. I have a Radeon HD 5670 512mb.

The resolution setting makes a huge difference as I was noting.
Also the 5670 sadly is really nothing compared to the gtx580.

GeForce GTX 580 vs Radeon HD 5670 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare

The lowest comparison puts the 580 at 201% more effective and the highest comparison at nearly 500%

There just really is no comparison, the 5670 is great for what it's supposed to be a low power budget range gamer's card, but it's just not going to match the top shelf cards a lot of people here have.

 

[Alsisgevat]

But that benchmark doesnt seem to nitice I am running SLI...

 

[Maguscreed]

IT sees my gtx580 as a generic 256mb card.
Before that it was seeing it as a intel 3000hd, which is actually okay since I have a sandy bridge mobo that's actually true. I have it, it's just never in use, only the dedicated gtx580

 

[Alsisgevat]

Yeah, I see it shows mine as the intel one too, so not the best benchmark out there...

 

[BugMeister]

That's what I'm saying the score takes absolutely nothing into account apparently except the raw number of frames rendered throughout the test
Which makes the result fairly meaningless.
Unless absolutely everyone is using all identical settings... which we obviously aren't.

My first result up top was this same system with all the benchmark settings actually cranked.

I agree entirely..
my monitor won't even reach the res that you guys are running at..!! :shock::shock:

 

[jeepmann4x4]

Ran a few more for fun!!

 

[Britton30]

I'm no gamer, but have some questions. What good is it too have a FPS higher than 120, which is the refresh rate of a higher end monitor, most are 60Hz. Movies are filmed at 24 FPS, maybe 30.
So, if your FPS is, say, 500 and your monitor can refresh 120 times per second, wouldn't you only effectively see 4.166 FPS?

 

[Maguscreed]

No you effectively see about 35fps give or take a few frames per second I see people arguing it all over the net but you can not overcome the way your eye is physically designed...sorry superman.

Most the vast difference people see when visiting their friends with higher priced systems are in fact in the monitors. Better color response, better contrast ratios.
Generally any frame count over around 25 is playable, but I will admit I notice a difference when @60 or higher. I don't think... as most people do that this is because I'm actually seeing the frames, but rather that once you reach this point the card is no longer under so much stress and is simply doing a better job rendering because of it.

 

[BugMeister]

the (8.97 18th April) BETA driver over at Guru3d gives some good results:


if you're the adventurous type, get the driver here:
AMD Catalyst 12.x (8.97 April 18) Unofficial BETA - Guru3D.com Forums

I installed this one straight over the earlier 8 960.0 BETA (March 15th)
it runs very smoothly - Skyrim and BF3 (in particular) run beautifully..

7*** series users, take note..

 

[Britton30]

Thanks, I know humans perceive anything more than 24 FPS as a smooth motion, but dogs and birds I understand have to have a higher FPS.
I think hand drawn animation was done with 18 FPS and the early King Kong puppet movies were 12 or so.
there is the possibility I'm full of it too.

No you effectively see about 35fps give or take a few frames per second I see people arguing it all over the net but you can not overcome the way your eye is physically designed...sorry superman.

Most the vast difference people see when visiting their friends with higher priced systems are in fact in the monitors. Better color response, better contrast ratios.
Generally any frame count over around 25 is playable, but I will admit I notice a difference when @60 or higher. I don't think... as most people do that this is because I'm actually seeing the frames, but rather that once you reach this point the card is no longer under so much stress and is simply doing a better job rendering because of it.

 

[Solarstarshines]

with Tv's being 60 hz 120hz 240hz it is the response time not frame rate the faster the hz the faster the tv will respond

Frames per second are noticable after 60 Because the speed will be almost to much for you to handle


I noticed when i played dead island it was going so fast i was like whoa i checked fraps i was hitting 270 frams per second you throw v sync on and it will be reduced but yeah higher frams are noticable