[Theory] Next frontier of graphics: solid models?

FuturDreamz

Spacemonaut
Guru
Local time
6:11 AM
Messages
1,660
Location
Lethbridge, AB
Currently everything rendered in games are basically shell wireframes, so only the visible layer of the object is rendered and it has nothing inside (no skeleton or anything). This requires complex formulas to simulate realistic movement an animation. That's why we have such a hard time making people look realistic. I think Nvidia is barking up the wrong tree with adding imperfections such as pockmarks, because who wants to see Lara Croft with blackheads?

My proposal is to simulate the entire body. Skeleton, muscles, skin, lungs, blood, the works. All movement would be defined with how these elements interact, and damage (such as cuts or bruises) can be rendered accurately. And attacking would be more realistic because instead of requiring multiple shots to the head to kill an enemy, you'd have to hit an actual vital spot.

This, of course, requires much more powerful gaming systems, and could be what AMD and Nvidia need to keep the threat of Intel's "good enough" away.


Thoughts?
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)1.83GHz Intel Core Duo2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM (PC2-5300) (upgrade)ATI Radeon X1600 with 128MB GDDR3 memory
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Apple 17" iMac MA199LL (Early 2006)
OS
Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)
CPU
1.83GHz Intel Core Duo
Memory
2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM (PC2-5300) (upgrade)
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon X1600 with 128MB GDDR3 memory
Monitor(s) Displays
17-inch TFT active-matrix LCD, millions of colors
Screen Resolution
1440 x 900
Hard Drives
Hitachi 320GB HDT721032SLA360 7200RPM SATA II (upgrade)
Keyboard
Microsoft Wired Keyboard 600
Mouse
Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse v2.0
Internet Speed
4 Mbps
Antivirus
Microsoft Security Essentials
Browser
Google Chrome
Other Info
WEI:
Base Score: 3.9 Processor: 4.4 Memory 4.7
Graphics: 3.9 Gaming Graphics: 4.1 Primary HD: 5.9
Cool idea but will prolly never happen. Not only would you need a monster PC but the games would be horrendously expensive due to the sheer amount of programmers required.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 x64 ProfessionalIntel Core i7-870 Lynnfield 2.93 GHzKingston Hyper X 1333MHz DDR3 4x4GbNvidia GTS 250
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Own build
OS
Windows 7 x64 Professional
CPU
Intel Core i7-870 Lynnfield 2.93 GHz
Motherboard
Intel Whitesburg P55 LGA1156
Memory
Kingston Hyper X 1333MHz DDR3 4x4Gb
Graphics Card(s)
Nvidia GTS 250
Monitor(s) Displays
AOC Q3279VWF 31.5"
Screen Resolution
2560x1440
Hard Drives
Western Digital 1000GB Hard Drive (SATA 3.0Gb/s, 7200rpm, 32MB Cache)
Verbatim 500GB (External)
PSU
650W
Case
Coolermaster HAF 912
Cooling
Stock
Keyboard
Logitech
Mouse
Logitech
Antivirus
Avira
Browser
Firefox
Other Info
LG OptDrive 24x SATA DVDRW Lightscribe
It might be enough to fire up the cpu doubling law again.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)1.83GHz Intel Core Duo2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM (PC2-5300) (upgrade)ATI Radeon X1600 with 128MB GDDR3 memory
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Apple 17" iMac MA199LL (Early 2006)
OS
Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)
CPU
1.83GHz Intel Core Duo
Memory
2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM (PC2-5300) (upgrade)
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon X1600 with 128MB GDDR3 memory
Monitor(s) Displays
17-inch TFT active-matrix LCD, millions of colors
Screen Resolution
1440 x 900
Hard Drives
Hitachi 320GB HDT721032SLA360 7200RPM SATA II (upgrade)
Keyboard
Microsoft Wired Keyboard 600
Mouse
Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse v2.0
Internet Speed
4 Mbps
Antivirus
Microsoft Security Essentials
Browser
Google Chrome
Other Info
WEI:
Base Score: 3.9 Processor: 4.4 Memory 4.7
Graphics: 3.9 Gaming Graphics: 4.1 Primary HD: 5.9
Back
Top