Solved Two Program Files Folders
- Thread starter new
- Start date
Yes, it is ...
My Computer
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- LENOVO K450 @3.0GHZ
- OS
- 64-bit Windows 8.1 Pro
- CPU
- Core(TM) i5 CPU 4330 Haswell @ 3.20GHz
- Motherboard
- LENOVO
- Memory
- 12.00 GB
- Graphics Card(s)
- Intel(R) HD Graphics
- Sound Card
- Intel HD integtrated
- Monitor(s) Displays
- HP 25' ISP Monitor
- Screen Resolution
- 1900/1020
- Hard Drives
- (1) ST1000DM003-1CH162 (2) Generic STORAGE DEVICE USB Device (3) Generic STORAGE DEVICE USB Device
- Internet Speed
- 100mb down/10mb up
When you install new software, Windows 7 puts it automatically on Program Files folder if the software you are installing is 64-bit version.
All 32-bit programs are installed to Program Files (x86) folder.
Kari
All 32-bit programs are installed to Program Files (x86) folder.
Kari
My Computer
- Computer type
- Laptop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- HP ENVY 17-1150eg
- OS
- Windows 10 Pro x64 EN-GB
- CPU
- 1.6 GHz Intel Core i7-720QM Processor
- Memory
- 6 GB
- Graphics Card(s)
- ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Graphics
- Sound Card
- Beats sound system with integrated subwoofer
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 17" laptop display, 22" LED and 32" Full HD TV through HDMI
- Screen Resolution
- 1600*900 (1), 1920*1080 (2&3)
- Hard Drives
- Internal: 2 x 500 GB SATA Hard Disk Drive 7200 rpm
External: 2TB for backups, 3TB USB3 network drive for media
- Cooling
- As Envy runs a bit warm, I have it on a Cooler Master pad
- Keyboard
- Logitech diNovo Media Desktop Laser (bluetooth)
- Mouse
- Logitech Performance Mouse MX
- Internet Speed
- 50/10 Mbps VDSL
- Antivirus
- Windows Defender 4.3.9431.0
- Browser
- Maxthon 3.5.2., IE11
- Local time
- 3:56 PM
- Messages
- 1,557
Performance can be enhanced sometimes but 64-bit was really designed to allow for more addressing space. That is, more memory (RAM) can be installed and utilized by the system.
In many cases where not a lot of RAM is needed, 32-bit Windows can still outperform 64-bit.
In many cases where not a lot of RAM is needed, 32-bit Windows can still outperform 64-bit.
My Computer
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Too many to list.
- OS
- XP, Seven, 2008R2
- CPU
- AMD, Intel, VIA
- Motherboard
- Various
- Memory
- Corsair, Kingston, etc.
- Graphics Card(s)
- ATI, NVIDIA
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Samsung
- Hard Drives
- Maxtor, Western Digital
- Keyboard
- qwerty
- Internet Speed
- 22 Mb/s @ home, 1 Gb/s @ server
- Other Info
- All of my systems still run fastest on XP 32-bit for the most part. Win7 is fun to play with, but I still prefer XP for raw speed, security, and functionality.
- Local time
- 3:56 PM
- Messages
- 75
Why is that?
My Computer
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Home Built
- OS
- Win 7 Pro
- CPU
- Intel i7 2600K
- Motherboard
- Asus P8Z68-V LX
- Memory
- 16 GB 1333 Crucial Hyper-X Blu I think
- Graphics Card(s)
- Integrated
- Sound Card
- Integrated
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Dual LCD IPS panels
- Screen Resolution
- 1980x1200, 1980x1080
- Hard Drives
- 3 SATA: 250, 160, 2000 GB, External USB 3TB
- PSU
- OCZ modular 500W
- Case
- Antec 300
- Cooling
- Case: 2 Stock fans, CPU: CoolerMaster Evo 212; PSU: fan
- Keyboard
- Dell Logitech wireless
- Mouse
- Logitech Wireless 510
- Internet Speed
- 1.0 Mbps down, 448 Kbps up
- Other Info
- Case is too small.