VM Ware or Hyper-V?

loaba

New member
Member
VIP
Local time
4:20 AM
Messages
161
Location
Albuquerque
I'm taking Windows Server and Linux Essentials this summer and have used both VM Ware (Linux, Ubuntu) and Hyper-V (Server 2008 R2).

I want work on both OS's from home and I could do a triple boot, but I think it would be good to use virtual machines for a while. What's the best configuration here? Should I just install both apps, or is one clearly better than the other?

I'll get lots of experience using Hyper-V in the the Windows class, so if I use VM Ware at home I think that would be okay.

Couple of random thoughts... My system only has 4gb of RAM, so I'll only be able to run one VM at a time. If I upgrade to 8gb pg RAM, how taxing would it be to have both VM's up at the same time? I'd allocate 2gb each, leaving 4gb for the host (Win 7).

What are your thoughts?
 

My Computer

Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Sager NP9150
OS
Windows 7 Home x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-3610QM @ 2.3GHz x4
Motherboard
Clevo P15xEMx
Memory
16GBs
Graphics Card(s)
nVidia GeForce GTX 670M
Sound Card
Realtek High Def Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
Samsung SyncMaster S24B300 + Mobile Display
Screen Resolution
1920x1080 + 1920x1080 (running 1366x768)
Hard Drives
128GBt SSD
500GBt HDD
Keyboard
Logitech K360
Mouse
Logitech Anywhere Mouse MX
Internet Speed
Fat
Antivirus
Avast
Browser
Chrome
I can't comment on which VM machine is more suited to your task (I use VM Ware Workstation and Suns VirtualBox) but upgrading to 8GB for running multiple machines would indeed be beneficial. (less pagefile swapping is always a good thing for smoothness)

Personally, on my intel OC'ed Q9550 8GB and my current i7 + 6GB I didn't/dont feel the machine was taxed at all and was easily able to handle multiple VMs running at once.

However, the CPU's themselves also had a large part to do with that.


Basically, more RAM = Better :)
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Systems by SmartEyeball
OS
8 Pro x64
CPU
i7 3770K 4.6GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P8Z77 WS
Memory
16GB G.Skill Trident X 2666mhz
Graphics Card(s)
x2 EVGA 780 Ti Superclocked SLI
Sound Card
SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB / ATH-AD900 Headphones
Monitor(s) Displays
x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung
Screen Resolution
5760*1200/ 1920*1200
Hard Drives
2x Intel 520 240GB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0) * 2TB WD Caviar Black * Sony Optirac DVD
PSU
Silverstone Strider Evolution 1200W
Case
Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
Cooling
Noctua NH-D14
Keyboard
Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
Mouse
Thermaltake Theron (Highly Recommended) + Razer Imperator
Antivirus
MSE
Browser
IE, FF, WaterFox
Other Info
GT Extreme V2 Sim Racing Cockpit + 40" LCD and K/B Mouse stand ▼
Fanatec CSR Elite Wheel + Clubsport V1 Pedals + CSR shifter/7G-H ▼Saitek X52 Pro ▼ TrackIR 5 Pro
Buttkicker v2 Seat Rumbler with Dedicated 5.1 and Sub Woofer attached to frame ▼
=
Bloody Big Grin
Smarty - I don't have any real application, other than initial setup and running lab exercises. Long term, I imagine Server 2008 will go away, or be relegated to a testing role. Linux is another beast entirely. Initially, it to will be for lab purposes, mainly command line stuff. However, I like Linux and want to continue using it, along with Windows.

Currently, I have a dual-boot situation that is more than a little unsatisfying. I'd like get away from it, so virtualization is really tantalizing. I think the best setup will be to use Windows 7 as the host and to then virtualize Linux (and Server 2008). I just don't know which VM app is best.
 

My Computer

Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Sager NP9150
OS
Windows 7 Home x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-3610QM @ 2.3GHz x4
Motherboard
Clevo P15xEMx
Memory
16GBs
Graphics Card(s)
nVidia GeForce GTX 670M
Sound Card
Realtek High Def Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
Samsung SyncMaster S24B300 + Mobile Display
Screen Resolution
1920x1080 + 1920x1080 (running 1366x768)
Hard Drives
128GBt SSD
500GBt HDD
Keyboard
Logitech K360
Mouse
Logitech Anywhere Mouse MX
Internet Speed
Fat
Antivirus
Avast
Browser
Chrome
Depending on how the app itself behaves inside the VM, it essentially comes down to a matter of personal preference.

I haven't personally used Hyper-V myself, so can't comment on that one.


I have found that overall, Suns Virtualbox 'feels' smoother and snappier than VM Workstation does. Conversely, it does does have it's limitations. Seamless integration wise, it can be hit and miss depending on which distro you use. Some are great, others not so much.

Popular distro's like Ubuntu for example, even support Compiz etc. Other's have spotty host/guest integration support.

Another downside is that Sun has now been taken over by Oracle and I have as yet to try it's offering as anecdotal reports are that it's still rather buggy. I don't know how much longer the Sun version will be supported. Current version is 3.1.8

Workstation, once running is smooth, but does take longer to resume/save states etc. As for distro support, I haven't really used it as much for Linux as I tend to use Virtualbox for most of my Linux VM's.

I guess the simple and unfortunate answer, is try them all and use the one that works for what you need, and which you like the best.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Systems by SmartEyeball
OS
8 Pro x64
CPU
i7 3770K 4.6GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P8Z77 WS
Memory
16GB G.Skill Trident X 2666mhz
Graphics Card(s)
x2 EVGA 780 Ti Superclocked SLI
Sound Card
SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB / ATH-AD900 Headphones
Monitor(s) Displays
x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung
Screen Resolution
5760*1200/ 1920*1200
Hard Drives
2x Intel 520 240GB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0) * 2TB WD Caviar Black * Sony Optirac DVD
PSU
Silverstone Strider Evolution 1200W
Case
Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
Cooling
Noctua NH-D14
Keyboard
Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
Mouse
Thermaltake Theron (Highly Recommended) + Razer Imperator
Antivirus
MSE
Browser
IE, FF, WaterFox
Other Info
GT Extreme V2 Sim Racing Cockpit + 40" LCD and K/B Mouse stand ▼
Fanatec CSR Elite Wheel + Clubsport V1 Pedals + CSR shifter/7G-H ▼Saitek X52 Pro ▼ TrackIR 5 Pro
Buttkicker v2 Seat Rumbler with Dedicated 5.1 and Sub Woofer attached to frame ▼
=
Bloody Big Grin
I guess the simple and unfortunate answer, is try them all and use the one that works for what you need, and which you like the best.
Well, I am trying to a get an Associates degree in Systems Administration (perhaps even a Bachelors in Computer Science), so trying 'em all is exactly what I should be doing.

  • Hyper-V - as I said earlier, I'll get plenty of this in my two Windows labs, so maybe I can pass on it at home.
  • Virtualbox - I keep seeing references to this app, who makes it? Is it free DL?
  • VM Ware - I know there is a free (gimped?) version of it, so I'll definitely give it a go.

Thanks for all your input, Smarty. :)
 

My Computer

Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Sager NP9150
OS
Windows 7 Home x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-3610QM @ 2.3GHz x4
Motherboard
Clevo P15xEMx
Memory
16GBs
Graphics Card(s)
nVidia GeForce GTX 670M
Sound Card
Realtek High Def Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
Samsung SyncMaster S24B300 + Mobile Display
Screen Resolution
1920x1080 + 1920x1080 (running 1366x768)
Hard Drives
128GBt SSD
500GBt HDD
Keyboard
Logitech K360
Mouse
Logitech Anywhere Mouse MX
Internet Speed
Fat
Antivirus
Avast
Browser
Chrome

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Systems by SmartEyeball
OS
8 Pro x64
CPU
i7 3770K 4.6GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P8Z77 WS
Memory
16GB G.Skill Trident X 2666mhz
Graphics Card(s)
x2 EVGA 780 Ti Superclocked SLI
Sound Card
SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB / ATH-AD900 Headphones
Monitor(s) Displays
x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung
Screen Resolution
5760*1200/ 1920*1200
Hard Drives
2x Intel 520 240GB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0) * 2TB WD Caviar Black * Sony Optirac DVD
PSU
Silverstone Strider Evolution 1200W
Case
Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
Cooling
Noctua NH-D14
Keyboard
Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
Mouse
Thermaltake Theron (Highly Recommended) + Razer Imperator
Antivirus
MSE
Browser
IE, FF, WaterFox
Other Info
GT Extreme V2 Sim Racing Cockpit + 40" LCD and K/B Mouse stand ▼
Fanatec CSR Elite Wheel + Clubsport V1 Pedals + CSR shifter/7G-H ▼Saitek X52 Pro ▼ TrackIR 5 Pro
Buttkicker v2 Seat Rumbler with Dedicated 5.1 and Sub Woofer attached to frame ▼
=
Bloody Big Grin
I love Virtual Box, free, functional.

That means it MUST be screwed over and soon, it's the way life works :)

But since it is a free DL and takes a minute to install and try out, there's no reason not to.

VMWare works pretty good but it's also not without it's own tweaky host integration problems. I use it at work, but at home I use VirtualBox.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Scratch built
OS
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
CPU
i7 960
Motherboard
Asus P6X58D
Memory
12 Gig Corsair Dominator
Graphics Card(s)
Nvidia 480
Sound Card
Maudio Delta 44 + breakout box
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell UltraSharp U2410 24in and Samsung 21 dual monitors
Screen Resolution
1920x1200 and 1280x1024
Hard Drives
Primary: Intel X-25M G2 160G SSD
Secondary: Segate baracuda 1.0 TB
HDs in AHCI mode.
PSU
Corasair TX850
Case
Cooler Master HAF
Cooling
Corsair H50
Keyboard
Logitech G15 + N52 game pad
Mouse
Logitech MX518
Internet Speed
15kbs down 4.5kbps up
Other Info
WEI 7.6
CPU & RAM 7.6
Graphics 7.9
Hard disk 7.7
loaba, there are 3 major virtualization techniques that are commonly used today. I'll try to explain it as simple as I can...

  1. Software mode: this is what VMware has been (with some Virtualization acceleration, maybe it'll speed up a little). This type, you can say it's the most "compatible" of all techniques, because it recreates every hardware there is in a PC in software. With the help of Virtualization acceleration (VT-x, AMD-V), it can boost the speed a little, but most of the hardware recognized by the VM Guest is still in software. This type is the slowest of all, because every instructions the guest issued will be checked to see if it's safe or not, a not safe instruction can crash the VM and the HOST together. Several examples: VirtualPC, VirtualBox, VMware Player/Workstation/Server
  2. Paravirtualization mode: this is what is used by Xen (or XenSource). It's a virtualization technique that requires a modified kernel, to make the guest aware that it's virtualized and needs to use "safe" instructions. This type is much faster than any other types but it requires a lot of work on the guest OS kernel side. Example: Xen.
  3. Hypervisor: this is the last type, it's the latest technique, bare metal, use the latest tech in virtualization world. Most of other virtualization techniques, you need a host OS, and the virtualization software runs on top of this host OS. Hypervisor OTOH is THE OS, it's a thin layer of virtualization platform that have very small foot print that manages the guest OSes. This type is the hype these days, it's currently the faster ones and almost the most "compatible". Several examples: Hyper-V, VMware ESX, and Proxmox.
zzz2496
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows7 Ultimate 64bit
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Motherboard
Abit IN9-32X-MMAX
Memory
DDR2 Adata 4GB
Graphics Card(s)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 1024 and Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 512
Sound Card
Asus Xonar HDAV 1.3
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 2407WFP and BenQ 2400v and Philips 150v3
Screen Resolution
3840x1200 and 1024x768
Hard Drives
2 WDC 1TB
1 WDC 1.5TB
1 WDC 640GB
1 WDC 320GB
1 Seagate 200GB
PSU
Corsair TX 850W
Case
Cooler Master HAF932
Cooling
Arctic Cooling Freezer Extreme and plenty of fans...
Keyboard
MicrosoftNaturalKeyboard 4000/Apple Alu keyboard/Dinovo mini
Mouse
Logitech G5/MarbleMouseTrackball/PerformanceMX/SpacePilotPRO
Internet Speed
1.5Mbps down/384Kbps up
Other Info
APC SURT 1000XL
Logitech Z-560
Wiimote
Mikrotik Router
Linksys (now Cisco) SD2008 8 port Gigabit switch
Linksys WRT54G (acting as AP)
Apple wireless Aluminium keyboard
Apple Magic Mouse
Xbox360 wired controller
I use virtualization stuff extensively at work. We run about 150 boxes virtually in production as well as test and development. All of our virtualization stuff is using VMWare's ESX products, or ESXi.

I have tried using Hyper-V, and even bought a book on Hyper-V to try to come to grips with it and compared to VMWare's offerings, I just don't care for it at all. The administration is a nightmare when you have workstations and servers in mixed domains, or some in workgroups and some on the domain.

At work, I have a few desktop type machines which I use for testing. With a dual core or quad core processor and 8GB of RAM...I have no problems running 3-4 concurrent virtual machines and still getting very good performance across all of the VM's and the host computer itself.


VMware has a smattering of virtualization products. Many of which are free...but not necessarily "gimped" as you suggested...just suited for different types of people. I'll highlight the main points of each one

  • vmware server 2.0. It's free and runs on a Windows system or Linux system. It's meant to be more of an enterprise or server based appication. It runs as a service, so you can log out of your computer and the VM's still run. However, it runs on-top of a fully running operating system...so performance while good isn't as good as it can be with a hypervisor based product
  • vmware-player 3.x. It's free and runs on a Windows system or Linux system. It's a client side workstation application...so you cannot log out of your session without shutting down the VM's. In the past, player could only playback machines...but with the 3.x release it can create them as well. It supports advanced graphics stuff like AERO. However, it doesn't support creating snapshots of running VM's and it's network choices are more simplistic than VMWare Workstation. Again it runs on-top of a host operating system, so performance less stellar than hypervisor based product.
  • VMWare Workstation: This is around $180. It's a workstation based product...This supports snapshotting and far more networking options than the VMWare Player application. Again it runs on-top of a host operating system, so performance less stellar than hypervisor based product.
  • VMware ESXi : This is free. It's a hypervisor product...which means that it runs as it's own operating system...thus there is no Windows or Linux host already running on the machine. It has a very small install footprint and utilizes hardware extremely well. You do have to manage the guests and the configuration of them from another machine on the networking using the free vsphere client. It has tons of hardware options and is pretty much fully functional....but there is a catch. The advanced functionality features like DRS (dynamic resource scheduling) and vmotion (automatic failover of VM's to another ESXi box) require the purchase of a vCenter Server and associated licenses for the ESXi boxes themselves. And these licenses aren't cheap ($1,000 to $15,000). Of course, in all fairness.....these advanced features also require things like shared storage and such to function....and these are often expensive solutions themselves. Be advised that you need to make sure that the hardware that you want to use must be on the approved hardware list.. This product works great on servers and with certain chipsets, storage drivers and network drivers for some consumer based mobos. There are whitelist guides which will help you buy the right parts to assemble a desktop style machine capable of running ESXi 4.0. And one great tidbit, is that when you first install this product...you get 60 days of eval mode which enables all advanced functionality (of course you will have to also setup a vcenter server eval as well..which is free for 60 days to control that advanced functionality). So, you can see everything that VMware has to offer for free...and you could rebuild your test environment every 60 days if you were so inclined.
  • VMWare Vsphere (ESX). This is the non-free version of ESXi. It's the older system where VMWare loaded a hypervisor that was more of a fully functional Linux server after install. It comes by default with the licensing features and such which provide the advanced functionality...but immediately comes with a $5,000-$15,000+ cost up front just to get started.
Note: VMWare is really moving towards customers using ESXi as the hypervisors and just licensing vCenter Server and getting the associated advanced functionality licenses. The reason: ESXi is a smaller installed footprint, is not as much as a fully functional server...so it's smaller, faster and has less to patch and secure.


For my test lab at work, my workstation is custom built with ESXi friendly hardware and runs ESXi 4.0. It connects to local hard drives within the host, as well as shared storage being provided by another desktop via iSCSI and running OpenFiler.

For my actual workstation machine....I run Windows 7 on the host and VMWare Player 3.1 for my own personal testing and experimentation. This product has proved more than sufficient enough for everything that I have ever thrown at it. I evaluated the VMWare Workstation product...but couldn't justify the cost of the product for any of it's features...as they are not needed for the types of things that I do on this test machine.


At home, I used to use VirtualBox...but switched to VMWare when VMWare Player 3.x came out. For me, it's the ability to import the free XP Mode image, ability to run Aero, and the Unity mode which sealed the deal. Plus, since I'm so VMWare centric at work, it just made sense to use the same type of thing at work and keep consistency.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self-Built in July 2009
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS
Memory
8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570
Sound Card
Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio
Monitor(s) Displays
23" Acer x233H
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS
PSU
Corsair 620HX modular
Case
Antec P182
Cooling
stock
Keyboard
ABS M1 Mechanical
Mouse
Logitech G9 Laser Mouse
Internet Speed
15/2 cable modem
Other Info
Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset.
Hi,

I use Windows 2008 R2 as my workstation OS for everything with Hyper-V enabled, I think it's a great OS and Hyper-V allows me to quickly prototype in the test environment. One thing that you might find useful is a benchmark which helped me understand some of the finer configurations which are needed to get the most out of performance: Benchmarking Hyper-V on Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Performance Tuning

--cheers

I'm taking Windows Server and Linux Essentials this summer and have used both VM Ware (Linux, Ubuntu) and Hyper-V (Server 2008 R2).

I want work on both OS's from home and I could do a triple boot, but I think it would be good to use virtual machines for a while. What's the best configuration here? Should I just install both apps, or is one clearly better than the other?

I'll get lots of experience using Hyper-V in the the Windows class, so if I use VM Ware at home I think that would be okay.

Couple of random thoughts... My system only has 4gb of RAM, so I'll only be able to run one VM at a time. If I upgrade to 8gb pg RAM, how taxing would it be to have both VM's up at the same time? I'd allocate 2gb each, leaving 4gb for the host (Win 7).

What are your thoughts?
 

My Computer

OS
win 7
I just installed Ubuntu as a parasite on a fresh Win 7 install. I'm using Virtual Box and thus far I like it much better than Hyper-V or VM Ware. I will of course try those two at home before all is said and done.

After I get Ubuntu settled in, I'll move on to Server 2008 R2.

Thanks to everyone who took the time to post.
 

My Computer

Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Sager NP9150
OS
Windows 7 Home x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-3610QM @ 2.3GHz x4
Motherboard
Clevo P15xEMx
Memory
16GBs
Graphics Card(s)
nVidia GeForce GTX 670M
Sound Card
Realtek High Def Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
Samsung SyncMaster S24B300 + Mobile Display
Screen Resolution
1920x1080 + 1920x1080 (running 1366x768)
Hard Drives
128GBt SSD
500GBt HDD
Keyboard
Logitech K360
Mouse
Logitech Anywhere Mouse MX
Internet Speed
Fat
Antivirus
Avast
Browser
Chrome
Double-post: sorry

I've used VB for about 12 hours now, here a few things I've noticed about it so far.

I like the way the mouse capture tool functions. Maybe this is because my home box is much better than what I'm using at school, but the mouse interacts between the Host/Parasite exactly as it would if the Parasite were any other application. When I scroll from the Host/Parasite, the mouse is automatically captured by either one. There are no nasty key-combos required. I like this a lot, seems fluid and natural.

Desktop resolution was a little bit of an issue. I thought I'd just hit display settings and bump up the res a little bit. Nope, not that easy. I actually had to read the manual! Well, I survived and installed Guest Additions all by myself. :)

No Drag-and-Drop between Host and Parasite is a total bummer. I am sure there is a solid technical reason for this, but that is a feature I would love to see in the future. I wonder, is it a security concern though? As of right now, my virtual machine is pretty well insulated from the Host, so that is cool.

The VB interface seems to be much cleaner than either Hyper-V or VM Ware. Creating the virtual machine was simple and user-friendly.

Note: Virtual Box indicates that it does support Windows as Parasite on a Linux Host. That setup intrigues me. Is anyone currently using an Ubuntu 10.4 Host/Win 7 Parasite arraignment?
 

My Computer

Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Sager NP9150
OS
Windows 7 Home x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-3610QM @ 2.3GHz x4
Motherboard
Clevo P15xEMx
Memory
16GBs
Graphics Card(s)
nVidia GeForce GTX 670M
Sound Card
Realtek High Def Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
Samsung SyncMaster S24B300 + Mobile Display
Screen Resolution
1920x1080 + 1920x1080 (running 1366x768)
Hard Drives
128GBt SSD
500GBt HDD
Keyboard
Logitech K360
Mouse
Logitech Anywhere Mouse MX
Internet Speed
Fat
Antivirus
Avast
Browser
Chrome
Just a small heads up...

Err... It's called "Host - Guest" relationship, not "Host - Parasite"...

zzz2496
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows7 Ultimate 64bit
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Motherboard
Abit IN9-32X-MMAX
Memory
DDR2 Adata 4GB
Graphics Card(s)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 1024 and Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 512
Sound Card
Asus Xonar HDAV 1.3
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 2407WFP and BenQ 2400v and Philips 150v3
Screen Resolution
3840x1200 and 1024x768
Hard Drives
2 WDC 1TB
1 WDC 1.5TB
1 WDC 640GB
1 WDC 320GB
1 Seagate 200GB
PSU
Corsair TX 850W
Case
Cooler Master HAF932
Cooling
Arctic Cooling Freezer Extreme and plenty of fans...
Keyboard
MicrosoftNaturalKeyboard 4000/Apple Alu keyboard/Dinovo mini
Mouse
Logitech G5/MarbleMouseTrackball/PerformanceMX/SpacePilotPRO
Internet Speed
1.5Mbps down/384Kbps up
Other Info
APC SURT 1000XL
Logitech Z-560
Wiimote
Mikrotik Router
Linksys (now Cisco) SD2008 8 port Gigabit switch
Linksys WRT54G (acting as AP)
Apple wireless Aluminium keyboard
Apple Magic Mouse
Xbox360 wired controller
Just a small heads up...

Err... It's called "Host - Guest" relationship, not "Host - Parasite"...

zzz2496
Oh I know that, I just like the connotation provided by the word. Parasite is really what a virtual machine is; it takes resources (RAM and HDD space) away from the host [victim].

But yes, when speaking in terms of virtual machines, people use Guest/Host or Parent/Child. I just like to add a little humor to it all.

Note on 2008 Server: mouse capture tool is a bummer, meaning you have to use a hotkey-combo. :(
 

My Computer

Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Sager NP9150
OS
Windows 7 Home x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-3610QM @ 2.3GHz x4
Motherboard
Clevo P15xEMx
Memory
16GBs
Graphics Card(s)
nVidia GeForce GTX 670M
Sound Card
Realtek High Def Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
Samsung SyncMaster S24B300 + Mobile Display
Screen Resolution
1920x1080 + 1920x1080 (running 1366x768)
Hard Drives
128GBt SSD
500GBt HDD
Keyboard
Logitech K360
Mouse
Logitech Anywhere Mouse MX
Internet Speed
Fat
Antivirus
Avast
Browser
Chrome
Back
Top