spydaz
Banned
My Question: Whats happened to the send feedback shortcuts...?
Im running the windows 7 RC 7600 (ultimate)(standard build)
After fully testing hyper-V 64 / XPmode(vpc2009)
I am sorely dissapointed... Both lovely products BUT, Why have microsoft Trimmed down The Virtual PC Technology... New GUI / SHELL Ok....
But the actual virtual pc capabitlitys are VERY LOW....
Graphics --- Terrible (Very basic) in comparrison to CITRIX & Virtual BOX(new open source product) & VMWARE....
SOUND --- What are they doing????? Not even basic studio software can operate correctly as they all recieve FALSE readings Latency is TERRIBLE. Even with same comparisons...
Furthermore:
Why can 64-bit os HOST another 64-bit os....
WHY NOT allow the Virtual PC ATTACH ITSELF to the REAL HARDWARE When IN FULL MAXIMIZATION...
The virtual pcs now have less capabilitys that Remote PC(terminal services)
The only thing microsoft have ADDED is the SEAMLESS MODE, Which most others had already...
Perhaps they made the wrong descision over which DRIVER MODEL TO PICK (Wrong IDEALS)... Perhaps the are planning to release Better Virtual Hardware models in the SP1 or FINAL RTM VIRTUAL PC 2009....
I can understand Lowing the capeabilitys in the "BUSNESS PRODUCT" HYPER-V.... BUT VIRTUAL PC again for the GENRAL POPULATION we get shafted again....
The IDEAL VIRTUAL PC PRODUCT...
"Virtual BOX" <<< POSSIBLE
"VMWARE" <<<< OverDONE Too many crossover features (define its markets properly)
With a virtual pc product: We need to be able to Attach directly to hardware capabilitys (in some case).. Sound / GraPHICS <<<
Posiblitto create Taylored machines << different Grafics capabiltys / sound/ network / HD / CD / DVD /ZIP etc USB.
the ability to install Original drivers for ATTACHED HARDWARE. ANd VIrtual drivers for Virtual hardwares,... HYBRID Virtual PC... EVEN CLONED HARDWARE (Clone your graphics cards / Sound cards - converted to a virtual driver model)
Hmmm...
what is up with these guys.... always thinking about server stuff... BUSNESS....
What about the USER market..... We are moving FASTER than Microsoft's IDEALS ... by the time microsoft actually give us what we NEED/WANT the whole concept of computing will be changed....
CHECK OUT TESLA SUPERCOMPUTING <<<<<< NOW WE SEE >>>> WE WILL BE HERE AS STANDARD SOON... What OS will be able to handle PARRALELL COMPUTING ? 1000 Cores this is the way forward Check nvidia tesla for details.
PS: Sorry microsoft But you have let ME / US Down (TRUTH HURTS)
Im running the windows 7 RC 7600 (ultimate)(standard build)
After fully testing hyper-V 64 / XPmode(vpc2009)
I am sorely dissapointed... Both lovely products BUT, Why have microsoft Trimmed down The Virtual PC Technology... New GUI / SHELL Ok....
But the actual virtual pc capabitlitys are VERY LOW....
Graphics --- Terrible (Very basic) in comparrison to CITRIX & Virtual BOX(new open source product) & VMWARE....
SOUND --- What are they doing????? Not even basic studio software can operate correctly as they all recieve FALSE readings Latency is TERRIBLE. Even with same comparisons...
Furthermore:
Why can 64-bit os HOST another 64-bit os....
WHY NOT allow the Virtual PC ATTACH ITSELF to the REAL HARDWARE When IN FULL MAXIMIZATION...
The virtual pcs now have less capabilitys that Remote PC(terminal services)
The only thing microsoft have ADDED is the SEAMLESS MODE, Which most others had already...
Perhaps they made the wrong descision over which DRIVER MODEL TO PICK (Wrong IDEALS)... Perhaps the are planning to release Better Virtual Hardware models in the SP1 or FINAL RTM VIRTUAL PC 2009....
I can understand Lowing the capeabilitys in the "BUSNESS PRODUCT" HYPER-V.... BUT VIRTUAL PC again for the GENRAL POPULATION we get shafted again....
The IDEAL VIRTUAL PC PRODUCT...
"Virtual BOX" <<< POSSIBLE
"VMWARE" <<<< OverDONE Too many crossover features (define its markets properly)
With a virtual pc product: We need to be able to Attach directly to hardware capabilitys (in some case).. Sound / GraPHICS <<<
Posiblitto create Taylored machines << different Grafics capabiltys / sound/ network / HD / CD / DVD /ZIP etc USB.
the ability to install Original drivers for ATTACHED HARDWARE. ANd VIrtual drivers for Virtual hardwares,... HYBRID Virtual PC... EVEN CLONED HARDWARE (Clone your graphics cards / Sound cards - converted to a virtual driver model)
Hmmm...
what is up with these guys.... always thinking about server stuff... BUSNESS....
What about the USER market..... We are moving FASTER than Microsoft's IDEALS ... by the time microsoft actually give us what we NEED/WANT the whole concept of computing will be changed....
CHECK OUT TESLA SUPERCOMPUTING <<<<<< NOW WE SEE >>>> WE WILL BE HERE AS STANDARD SOON... What OS will be able to handle PARRALELL COMPUTING ? 1000 Cores this is the way forward Check nvidia tesla for details.
PS: Sorry microsoft But you have let ME / US Down (TRUTH HURTS)
My Computer
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- MySelF -
- OS
- Windows 7 64-bit 7600 OEM
- CPU
- AMD Phenom Quad CORE 2.5 ghz
- Motherboard
- Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H AMD 780G Micro-ATX (Socket AM2) PCI-E
- Memory
- OCZ Vista Series 8GB (2x4GB) DDR2 PC2-6400C5 Dual Channel
- Graphics Card(s)
- RADION 3200 HDMI & DVI
- Sound Card
- EMU 1812 - Optical ADAT
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 42LG LCD & 2 19inch ELO TOUCH SCREENS
- Screen Resolution
- 1360x768
- Hard Drives
- 2 1TB samsung 39mbCACHE - SATA
1 500GB Western Digital - SATA
- PSU
- 500W
- Case
- silverstone -
- Cooling
- Standard CPU FAN <<<<< ALWAYS BEST >>>>> Coolermaster
- Keyboard
- Microsoft Wireless optical
- Mouse
- Microsoft Wireless optical
- Internet Speed
- 2mbits
- Other Info
- Will be Getting the Tesla Card from NVIDIA SOON <<<<< tesla supercomputer >>> nvidia CODA, PS: Motherboard Has Got Hardware assisted virtualization... If Your motherboard does not have it, It may JUST need the correct BIOS UPGRADE, CHECK BIOS DATES BEFORE FINALIZING A BUY, EVEN LOOKIN BIOS IF POSSIBLE as its not stated on the spec sheets, THAT WILL HAVE TO CHANGE as many mother board DO have hardw