What's your Reliability index score?

[Bare Foot Kid]

Here's mine from 64-bit 7057.







Later :shock: Ted

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

This is the most stable one I have yet installed, not one crash of any kind in the six days that I have been using it; I'd like to see how the rest of y'all are doing.

64-bit 7068






Later :shock: Ted

 

[smarteyeball]

On the plus side, at least I know what's causing it

 

[Cov]

Hmm, ...

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Last night I did an upgrade install from 7068 to 7077 and it went very well, only the second "upgrade" I've done so far with 7.

Windows 7 seems to be getting very stable in these later builds, no ATI driver crashes like I was having earlier, though the "Warning" you see during install was the ATI Catalyst Install Manager "Unsuccessful application reconfiguration ..." but Windows warned me of this before the install; the only "Application Failure" I've had since I installed 7068 on 28 March is the iexplore.exe failure you see on 5 April. I'm very pleased with what Windows 7 is becoming.




Later :shock: Ted

 

[brummyfan]

Hi,
It looks good but I have to admit that I haven't done much on this desktop last few days.

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

This, 7077 is still the most stable build yet.









Later :shock: Ted

 

[smarteyeball]

With all the app crashes and one niggling regular BSoD, it's still pretty poor

 

[murphy25]

tried this as well aint installed long but so far so good

 

[smarteyeball]

7100 - Maintaining the consistency



To be fair, I'm having less BSoD overall and Mirrors Edge crashes on exit every bloody time

 

[Mark]

LOL, nice reliability you have there SE.

Here's mine, as you can see I too have had a bit of a rough ride, with a few strange unseen errors to begin with, but it seems to have fixed itself now and has been plain sailing for the last few days.

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Mine was doing real good until I decided to install and run Malwarebytes; I think MBAM and SpeedFan had it out and SF lost.

I've been using 7100 almost exclusively since install on the 24th.

@Mr Grim did you do an upgrade or a clean install?




Later :shock: Ted

 

[kellymac35]

I have stayed with build 7000 very stable.

 

[Mark]

Mine was doing real good until I decided to install and run Malwarebytes; I think MBAM and SpeedFan had it out and SF lost.

I've been using 7100 almost exclusively since install on the 24th.

@Mr Grim did you do an upgrade or a clean install?

View attachment 9368


Later :shock: Ted

Format and clean install.

 

[SqdnGuns]

The only thing I have problems with is IE. I tired to make myself use it all the time but got tired of it slowing to a crawl and eventually "(Not Responding)"..............Back to FF and the great add-ons.

 

[torrentg]

I'm on my pc many hours per day, always messing with settings, testing stuff out etc... so this is a little unusual for me, but it goes to show how great 7 really has been here. Perfect stability. I'm on 7100 x86 which was upgrade installed from 7077 and previously 7068.

 

[YupYup]

Been pulling a Bo Derek since build 7068, this shot is from build 7100.

 

[torrentg]

Hmmm...now I'm wondering. Does anyone know where the files or logs are stored that generate this report and can they be safely deleted to render a "new" rating starting from scratch?

 

[YupYup]

Hmmm...now I'm wondering. Does anyone know where the files or logs are stored that generate this report and can they be safely deleted to render a "new" rating starting from scratch?

I would imagine it's the same procedure used for vista. Reliability Monitor - Reset - Vista Forums

 

[torrentg]

Nice. Yeah, it's the same. I deleted the 2 folder contents and the report generated is now blank. Thanks.