While I'm very glad that your issue is seemingly resolved, I'd like to assure you that no amount of fragmentation will by itself cause a "memory leak". The way that individual files and their fragments are stored on disk does not directly map to their in-memory layout. Also, a "leak" is a very specific type of software defect - a bug in other words - which can only be resolved by a code-level reworking.
There are literally squillions of different possible leak causes. Just because somebody else thinks they have a "memory leak" doesn't mean it's the same issue.
Hi H2SO4 , thanks for Your attention and be careful with the ACID !!!
I am in computers from the 70th`s fairly I can say I am an expert on Hardware , Software I manage well but isn`t "My strong side" .
I`ve installed the W7 x64 on a brand new machine Gigabyte P45-UD3 , E8400 , 4g. Kingston ( 2x2) , Gigabyte ATI 4850 ( 1g.) , Wd. Green 320 g. , Wd Green 1 t. , two others 160g. HD`s .
At the begining all worked fine the used mem. was .9 to 1.25 g. after boot going up to 2 - 2.6 g. and down with opened and closed programs usually going back to 1.25 - 1.35 g.
Working with hundreds of .rar on the C: I`ve noticed the used mem. build up to 2.5 g. and stay there for hours without going down then I`ve seen that just exploring folders used mem goes up over 2 g.
1 to 1.5 g. of memory could not be identified as used by programws or services not in Task Mngr. or Procexe nor on Resource Monitor .
After the defrag on C: , about 7 days ago the machine went back to normal operation there should be a good reason for sure isn`t a Hardware problem .