Windows 7 vs Ubuntu Wireless

ukgovsucks

New member
Power User
VIP
Local time
10:56 PM
Messages
170
I have a wired and wireless setup at our home. The wireless is connected to an external antenna. What I'd like to know is why is it when I use Backtrack on Ubuntu I see many more networks than what I do in Windows 7? I also notice that the networks in Windows 7 appear and disappear.

My wireless device is a ALFA awus036h usb 2.0.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
AMD Phenom II x4 965
Motherboard
Gigabyte
Memory
8Gb Corsair XMS3 DDR3
Graphics Card(s)
Asus EN9600GT 512Mb DDR3 Fanless
Sound Card
Integrated
Monitor(s) Displays
Belinea 22" LCD (Primary) and HP 19" LCD (secondary)
Screen Resolution
1680 x 1050 / 1440 x 900
Hard Drives
4 x 1Tb
1 x 250Gb
+ Backup Drives
PSU
800w Silent
Case
Nifty looking Midi Case
Cooling
3 x Super Cooling Quiet Case Fans. Water Cooled CPU.
Keyboard
Saitek USB Illuminated
Mouse
Optical Wireless/Batteryless Mouse
Internet Speed
5Mb BT Total Broadband (True Unlimited Downloads)
How many networks you "see" is primarily a function of the wifi NIC driver. Obviously, Windows and Linux don't use the same driver(s).

In a dense urban environment the number of network signals detected by the hardware is going to be greater than what is presented to the OS and ultimately the user. Some are not going to be reported based on decisions around their apparent availability and signal strength. The cutoff point is determined by driver design.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Multiple machines in various stages of decomposition.
OS
Win7x64
How many networks you "see" is primarily a function of the wifi NIC driver. Obviously, Windows and Linux don't use the same driver(s).

In a dense urban environment the number of network signals detected by the hardware is going to be greater than what is presented to the OS and ultimately the user. Some are not going to be reported based on decisions around their apparent availability and signal strength. The cutoff point is determined by driver design.

So basically the Windows 7 driver (which auto-installed) restricts my access to some networks. The next question has to be, is there any way around this?
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
AMD Phenom II x4 965
Motherboard
Gigabyte
Memory
8Gb Corsair XMS3 DDR3
Graphics Card(s)
Asus EN9600GT 512Mb DDR3 Fanless
Sound Card
Integrated
Monitor(s) Displays
Belinea 22" LCD (Primary) and HP 19" LCD (secondary)
Screen Resolution
1680 x 1050 / 1440 x 900
Hard Drives
4 x 1Tb
1 x 250Gb
+ Backup Drives
PSU
800w Silent
Case
Nifty looking Midi Case
Cooling
3 x Super Cooling Quiet Case Fans. Water Cooled CPU.
Keyboard
Saitek USB Illuminated
Mouse
Optical Wireless/Batteryless Mouse
Internet Speed
5Mb BT Total Broadband (True Unlimited Downloads)
So basically the Windows 7 driver (which auto-installed) restricts my access to some networks. The next question has to be, is there any way around this?

BackTrack emphasises penetration testing, not reliable connectivity. Hence, the drivers it uses are going to report many more signals than your average Windows driver which is geared towards consumer and business use.

Is there any way around it? Depends on the specific driver you're using. Most likely no. They don't tend to expose their signal strength cutoff points as user-configurable settings, or at least that's my experience. My guess is that most of those values are not hard-wired (the driver will accept input for test and diagnostic purposes), but the challenge would be to find documentation on how that's implemented.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Multiple machines in various stages of decomposition.
OS
Win7x64
Back
Top