Imaging with free Macrium

ignatzatsonic said:

nevergiveup said:

thank you so much you guys are awesome. what do you think about aomei backupper standard free edition is it reliable ? which software makes high compression of system image because i have no external hdd right now so i have only option to save them in internal hdd later to move to external hdd.

I've never used Aomei, but it has a good reputation.

Macrium can make images with no, medium, or high compression. Medium is the default. An image with medium compression will normally take up about half as much space as is occupied by the partitions in the image. For instance, if you have a C partition of 500 GB and 200 GB are occupied, the image file of the C partition will be roughly 100 GB in size.

I've never tried high compression, so I can't tell you how much smaller those images might be.

The paid version of Macrium Reflect can increase or decrease the amount of compression used (I use the default setting though) and I believe you can do the same with the free version.

Lady Fitzgerald said:

ignatzatsonic said:

nevergiveup said:

thank you so much you guys are awesome. what do you think about aomei backupper standard free edition is it reliable ? which software makes high compression of system image because i have no external hdd right now so i have only option to save them in internal hdd later to move to external hdd.

I've never used Aomei, but it has a good reputation.

Macrium can make images with no, medium, or high compression. Medium is the default. An image with medium compression will normally take up about half as much space as is occupied by the partitions in the image. For instance, if you have a C partition of 500 GB and 200 GB are occupied, the image file of the C partition will be roughly 100 GB in size.

I've never tried high compression, so I can't tell you how much smaller those images might be.

The paid version of Macrium Reflect can increase or decrease the amount of compression used (I use the default setting though) and I believe you can do the same with the free version.

I found that setting the compression to high in Macrium slows it down a lot and doesn't make it much smaller so I leave it on the default too.

kado897 said:

Aomei looks quite good. I have tested it on a small partition with no problems. I use it as my second backup program with the paid version of Macrium as my first. I have not yet had to do a full restore with it. One advantage over free Macrium is the ability to do incremental and differential images and file backups. These features are only available in the paid Macrium versions.

I should point out that most people here, including me, do not recommend using incremental and differential imaging (although, of the two, differential backups are preferable). As long as one keeps only the OS and programs on the C: drive or partition and data on other drives or partitions, full backup images will be small enough to allow keeping several of them on hand. Also, one doesn't need to image just the OS and programs as often. I make my images only once a week and just before making a change, such as installing a new program or making major setting changes, then keep only the latest few (and the first image I made after setting up the computer). If one of the incremental or differential files gets lost or corrupted, recovery will fail.

Image compression of the C: drive is a bit confusing. While Macrium Reflect appears to compress the image quite a bit, it only appears to be that much because it doesn't image files that are automatically generated by the OS, such as the hyberfil.sys file. In my case, that file is huge (24GB since I have 32GB of RAM), so the compression appears to be far more than it really is.

Imaging is highly inefficient and much too slow for backing up all but the tiniest amount of data (the main reason one should keep the OS and programs separate from data). A folder/file syncing program, such as FreeFileSync or SyncToy, is (after the initial backup) much faster and takes up less room. It normally takes me only a few minutes to make a backup using FreeFileSync, depending how much data I've added or changed since the last backup, so I can easily make two backups my data once or more a day. A folder/file syncing program, when used in mirror mode, will compare the source drive or partition (the one being backed up) to the destination drive or partition (the backup), the copy files to the destination drive, or delete them, so that the destination drive is essentially a clone of the source drive.

Lady Fitzgerald said:

kado897 said:

Aomei looks quite good. I have tested it on a small partition with no problems. I use it as my second backup program with the paid version of Macrium as my first. I have not yet had to do a full restore with it. One advantage over free Macrium is the ability to do incremental and differential images and file backups. These features are only available in the paid Macrium versions.

I should point out that most people here, including me, do not recommend using incremental and differential imaging (although, of the two, differential backups are preferable). As long as one keeps only the OS and programs on the C: drive or partition and data on other drives or partitions, full backup images will be small enough to allow keeping several of them on hand. Also, one doesn't need to image just the OS and programs as often. I make my images only once a week and just before making a change, such as installing a new program or making major setting changes, then keep only the latest few (and the first image I made after setting up the computer). If one of the incremental or differential files gets lost or corrupted, recovery will fail.

Image compression of the C: drive is a bit confusing. While Macrium Reflect appears to compress the image quite a bit, it only appears to be that much because it doesn't image files that are automatically generated by the OS, such as the hyberfil.sys file. In my case, that file is huge (24GB since I have 32GB of RAM), so the compression appears to be far more than it really is.

Imaging is highly inefficient and much too slow for backing up all but the tiniest amount of data (the main reason one should keep the OS and programs separate from data). A folder/file syncing program, such as FreeFileSync or SyncToy, is (after the initial backup) much faster and takes up less room. It normally takes me only a few minutes to make a backup using FreeFileSync, depending how much data I've added or changed since the last backup, so I can easily make two backups my data once or more a day. A folder/file syncing program, when used in mirror mode, will compare the source drive or partition (the one being backed up) to the destination drive or partition (the backup), the copy files to the destination drive, or delete them, so that the destination drive is essentially a clone of the source drive.

Of the two differentials are preferred. I do weekly full and daily differentials so I'm never more than a day old if I need to restore. Even I can remember what changes I need to do to recover that period.

ICIT2LOL said:

whs said:

Forget the CPU usage thing. I never knew what that means. It seems to be a random number.

And don't get too held up with the read/write speeds. Good speeds are helpful but what really counts is the access time. And 3ms is too slow. It should be 1ms or less. SSDs are typically 0.1ms. Just to give you a perspective.

Great stuff Wolfgang that's why the Samsung flew when I ran the HD on it :) while the stick plodded along. You can see that in the pic what I am curious is that it throws those downward spikes each time I run it and am wondering if it just a changeover between the banks of chips within the SSD??

Sorry that is a bit OT but am curious.

I am not 100% certain, but I suspect the downward spikes occur when there is some system activity on the SSD thus disturbing the measurement. I would not worry about it. If you measure again, you might not see it or at different times.

Regarding AOMEI - I think that is work in progress.

For me the backupper worked well on a 64bit system but on a 32bit system I had all kinds of problems. Also with their other product - the One Key Recovery - that is a nice product which worked beautifully in W8.1 (see post #25 here) but not in W7. There it wrote the image but did not create the BCD entry. Probably because the bootmgr was on the C partition and not in an independent system partition. But that is not an uncommon configuration.

Plus my general complaint about AOMEI is their impossible user interface. A tiny window with black writing on dark blue background and messages with faint yellow writing on fair blue background is not acceptable.

I have written a letter to them about all those problems. We'll see what the answer is. The AOMEI products in their current stage I would not recommend.

kado897 said:

Lady Fitzgerald said:

kado897 said:

Aomei looks quite good. I have tested it on a small partition with no problems. I use it as my second backup program with the paid version of Macrium as my first. I have not yet had to do a full restore with it. One advantage over free Macrium is the ability to do incremental and differential images and file backups. These features are only available in the paid Macrium versions.

I should point out that most people here, including me, do not recommend using incremental and differential imaging (although, of the two, differential backups are preferable). As long as one keeps only the OS and programs on the C: drive or partition and data on other drives or partitions, full backup images will be small enough to allow keeping several of them on hand. Also, one doesn't need to image just the OS and programs as often. I make my images only once a week and just before making a change, such as installing a new program or making major setting changes, then keep only the latest few (and the first image I made after setting up the computer). If one of the incremental or differential files gets lost or corrupted, recovery will fail.

Image compression of the C: drive is a bit confusing. While Macrium Reflect appears to compress the image quite a bit, it only appears to be that much because it doesn't image files that are automatically generated by the OS, such as the hyberfil.sys file. In my case, that file is huge (24GB since I have 32GB of RAM), so the compression appears to be far more than it really is.

Imaging is highly inefficient and much too slow for backing up all but the tiniest amount of data (the main reason one should keep the OS and programs separate from data). A folder/file syncing program, such as FreeFileSync or SyncToy, is (after the initial backup) much faster and takes up less room. It normally takes me only a few minutes to make a backup using FreeFileSync, depending how much data I've added or changed since the last backup, so I can easily make two backups my data once or more a day. A folder/file syncing program, when used in mirror mode, will compare the source drive or partition (the one being backed up) to the destination drive or partition (the backup), the copy files to the destination drive, or delete them, so that the destination drive is essentially a clone of the source drive.

Of the two differentials are preferred. I do weekly full and daily differentials so I'm never more than a day old if I need to restore. Even I can remember what changes I need to do to recover that period.

I did mentions that differentials are preferred over incremental. I've found that weekly images are normally plenty for me; if anything, they are probably overkill and once a month would be enough but I need to have an established habit to ensure it does get done (stupid ADHD). My OS programs stay pretty stable unless I remove or add a program or make a major settings change, in which case I just make an image before making the changes. Even as "huge" as my C: drive is (64GB used out of 119GB available), it takes only ten minutes to make an image and verify it.

Ironically, I had to restore my latest image just a short while ago. One thing that is nice about Macrium Reflect Pro is I didn't have to dig out a restore USB stick or CD (I do have both just in case). I just opened up MR, set it to restore my latest image, and walked away. MR automatically shut down the computer, booted up Win PE, did the restore, shut down Win PE, then rebooted the computer. The entire process took no more than ten or fifteen minutes, if that (I didn't bother to time it; I just "busied myself elsewhere").