Hello gladson1976,
Thanks for your reply. I was able to show folder using "attributes:16[/SIZE][/SIZE]", but, even though I manually in Explorer set a file to read-only, I could not find any read-only files using "attributes:1".
So I remain confused. I am still curious as to how to do this in Explorer, but I just purchased File Locator Pro (recommended by 4wd above), and that solves the problem.
Thanks again to everyone for your responses.
Cheers,
Keith
Of course you did not find it because
you used the attribute search wrong, not as Gladson explained. The search
attributes:1 finds the files and folders where the
Read Only attribute is set but no other attributes. As Windows default is to set
Archive attribute on, you should have searched
attributes:33 because 1 (Read Only) + 32 (Archive) =
33.
Look here: I set
Read Only attribute to one file:
Then I search
attributes:33 i.e. files with both
Archive and
Read Only attributes set and of course Windows finds the file:
Searching
attributes:1 gives naturally nothing for I have no files in this folder where only the
Read Only attribute is set, all have the
Archive attribute on, too:
OK, let's remove the
Archive attribute from this file leaving only the
Read Only:
And now,
naturally, Windows Search finds my file using
attributes:1 i.e searching the files and folders where only the
Read Only attribute is set, all other attributes turned off:
You spent money for something that you could easily have done for free with native Windows Search, if you had just read the instructions given to you by Gladson instead of listening someone who very clearly knows next to nothing about Windows Search.
The search in (the excellent)
Freecommander filemanager does the job.
For paid programs, try
FileLocator Pro.
Hope this helps (and,
am awaiting the usual flak for recommending anything else than the built-in w7 search)
.
I find these comments of yours really obnoxious and repulsive. Every time, every thread when we are talking about Search you come and show your total lack of knowledge and give misleading information. This time it went so far that the OP spend money on a third party toy because of your "expertise".
A gentleman would contact OP now to compensate costs caused by his misleading advice.
Kari