- Local time
- 7:21 PM
- Messages
- 234
Guys isn't this bad even though it provides 100% compatibility?
I mean a virtual machine provides quite a bit of overhead so I kind of doubt performance might be optimal using XP Mode!! :shock:
If Win 7 would have been compatible without such workarounds I guess it would have been much better!
With Virtualization technologies embeded in our modern CPU it's really not a crap.
The only limitation is the total amount of RAM you have in your systeme and then, than amount of ram you can allocate to the VM. And with moderne PC the amount of RAM is not a real issue for performance, if you really need to, you can put 8 or 16GB in your System today!
I try all the new OS that cam out in VM for first instance, and today you can have full power in your VM. In ex. Seven run as fast on a VM than with an "hard installation" (no Aero glass because no 3D acceleration, but that's not the point).
For some "XP app" which doesn't have full compatibility in Seven virtualization is the best way to do.
My Computer
- OS
- Vista H.P. SP1 x32 Seven RC x64
- CPU
- Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz
- Motherboard
- GA-EP45-DS3L
- Memory
- 4Go PC2-6400
- Graphics Card(s)
- 8500GT @ 700/500
- Sound Card
- Audigy Platinium
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 920 + Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 720
- Screen Resolution
- 1600x1200 twice
- Hard Drives
- Hitachi 160Go
Maxtor 160Go (system drive)
Maxtor 200Go in Antec MX-1 EC external box (eSATA-USB2.0)
- PSU
- Corsair VX550W
- Case
- Thermaltake Xaser III
- Cooling
- Watercooling (CPU, GPU, HDD, NB)
- Keyboard
- MS Wireless Multimedia 6000 V2.0
- Mouse
- IntellEye Explorer 3.0
- Internet Speed
- ADSL 18Mbit/s/1Mbit/s
