Last edited:
My Computer
At a glance
Arch Linux 64-bit
- OS
- Arch Linux 64-bit
AV-Comparatives ~ Whole Product Dynamic Test ~ March-June 2011
- Thread starter malexous
- Start date
Noxiide
New member
Norton beat everyone by six percent.....
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bitIntel Core i5 M4304.00 GB DDR3NVIDIA GT 325M
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Asus N61-JV
- OS
- Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
- CPU
- Intel Core i5 M430
- Motherboard
- N61Jv
- Memory
- 4.00 GB DDR3
- Graphics Card(s)
- NVIDIA GT 325M
- Sound Card
- Realtek High Definition Audio
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 1366x768 Generic PnP Monitor
- Hard Drives
- Seagate 500 GB 7200 RPM
- PSU
- ....
- Case
- ....
- Cooling
- ....
Where? Anyway....my ESET did really well in the "Whole Product Dynamic Test" with 99.3% and norton 99.6%
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit SP1Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T6500 @ 2.10GHz313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX, 3GB RAMMobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Toshiba Satellite L505
- OS
- Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit SP1
- CPU
- Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T6500 @ 2.10GHz
- Motherboard
- TOSHIBA Portable PC (CPU
- Memory
- 313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX, 3GB RAM
- Graphics Card(s)
- Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
- Sound Card
- Realtek High Definition Audio
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 1x; Generic PnP Monitor |
- Screen Resolution
- 1366 X 768 - 32 bit
- Hard Drives
- 313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX
- Keyboard
- Standard PS/2 Keyboard
- Mouse
- Synaptics PS/2 Port TouchPad
These test only show resuts performed on specific malware samples. It does not reflect the real life performance of products. A 0.3% difference does not mean that Eset is better than Norton or vise versa
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 10 Pro x64, Arch LinuxIntel Core 2 Quad Q8200 OC'd 3.08GHz8GB DDR2 900MhzMSI GT730 2GB GDDR5 (Kepler)
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Custom Build
- OS
- Windows 10 Pro x64, Arch Linux
- CPU
- Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 OC'd 3.08GHz
- Motherboard
- Asus Rampage formula LGA775
- Memory
- 8GB DDR2 900Mhz
- Graphics Card(s)
- MSI GT730 2GB GDDR5 (Kepler)
- Sound Card
- Supreme FX2
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Samsung LS22F350 LED
- Screen Resolution
- 1080P
- Hard Drives
- Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB, 500GB Hitachi, 2TB Samsung, 500GB Seagate FreeAgent, 640GB Samsung, 160GB Toshiba (Arch)
- PSU
- AeroCool 500W Bronze
- Cooling
- Cooler Master V6 + 3X fans
- Keyboard
- Prolink keyboard
- Mouse
- Logitech M705
- Internet Speed
- 1MiB/s
- Browser
- Chrome Beta
That would mean that, in some cases Norton can have a protection rate of 100%? (Of course, the user of the PC would have to have experience)
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit SP1Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T6500 @ 2.10GHz313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX, 3GB RAMMobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Toshiba Satellite L505
- OS
- Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit SP1
- CPU
- Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T6500 @ 2.10GHz
- Motherboard
- TOSHIBA Portable PC (CPU
- Memory
- 313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX, 3GB RAM
- Graphics Card(s)
- Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
- Sound Card
- Realtek High Definition Audio
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 1x; Generic PnP Monitor |
- Screen Resolution
- 1366 X 768 - 32 bit
- Hard Drives
- 313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX
- Keyboard
- Standard PS/2 Keyboard
- Mouse
- Synaptics PS/2 Port TouchPad
You read my post wrong..Norton has HIGHER percentage than ESET..not the other way around. I personally do not recommend Norton but, I know it is a good software.
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit SP1Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T6500 @ 2.10GHz313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX, 3GB RAMMobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Toshiba Satellite L505
- OS
- Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit SP1
- CPU
- Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T6500 @ 2.10GHz
- Motherboard
- TOSHIBA Portable PC (CPU
- Memory
- 313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX, 3GB RAM
- Graphics Card(s)
- Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
- Sound Card
- Realtek High Definition Audio
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 1x; Generic PnP Monitor |
- Screen Resolution
- 1366 X 768 - 32 bit
- Hard Drives
- 313GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK3263GSX
- Keyboard
- Standard PS/2 Keyboard
- Mouse
- Synaptics PS/2 Port TouchPad
chevysales
New member
- Local time
- 10:33 PM
- Messages
- 21
what are you going by?
you may want to read the entire comparitive.... nav missed more than MSE did
about 5.3%................ too large of an amount for many, acceptable for others.
avast actually showed the greatest percantage overall.
did you really think nav beat out all the rest by such a crazy large amount? if you did this isn't a put down but you really must re-read the entire comparitve and understand it as a whole.
i am not a nav hater quite the contrary i would be using the av app if MSE wasn't free.
the whole story http://av-comparatives.org/images/stories/test/ondret/avc_od_feb2011.pdf
Last edited:
My Computer
At a glance
Wiindows 7 Professional 64biti7-94012 GBS Kingston HyperX @ 1600XFX GTS250 512mb
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Puget Systems
- OS
- Wiindows 7 Professional 64bit
- CPU
- i7-940
- Motherboard
- Asus P6T Deluxe
- Memory
- 12 GBS Kingston HyperX @ 1600
- Graphics Card(s)
- XFX GTS250 512mb
- Sound Card
- Asus Xonar D2X
- Monitor(s) Displays
- HP lp2475w
- Screen Resolution
- 1920 x 1200 24"
- Hard Drives
- Velicoraptor 150gbs- OS/Programs
WD Black 640gbs-Music/Pictures/Cache/Temp Files
- PSU
- Corsair 750
- Case
- P182 Gunmetal Grey
- Cooling
- Corsair H60 Cooler and couple 3 speed Antec Fans
- Keyboard
- MS 3000
- Mouse
- MS 6000
- Internet Speed
- Comcast Cable Business Grade :~)
- Other Info
- box built by Puget Systemsback in late Dec 2008 early i7 guy. had it built for my photography work with large raw files from Nikon D700 using Nikon NX2 and some lite music work from bundle that came with Xonar card.... Sonar, Ableton, Cakewalk, etc.
Stable as can be average around 9 to 10 using Windows 7 64 Reliability History.
My Computer
At a glance
Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops
- OS
- Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
- CPU
- from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 2x HP w2207
- Hard Drives
- 5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals
- Keyboard
- with trackball - no mices
- Mouse
- Trackball mice
- Internet Speed
- DSL 6000
chevysales
New member
- Local time
- 10:33 PM
- Messages
- 21
thats an important one for sure...
the entire comparative must be taken into account which shows many close in percentages of what it stops but a bigger spread as in chart above for what they miss.
the entire comparative must be taken into account which shows many close in percentages of what it stops but a bigger spread as in chart above for what they miss.
My Computer
At a glance
Wiindows 7 Professional 64biti7-94012 GBS Kingston HyperX @ 1600XFX GTS250 512mb
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Puget Systems
- OS
- Wiindows 7 Professional 64bit
- CPU
- i7-940
- Motherboard
- Asus P6T Deluxe
- Memory
- 12 GBS Kingston HyperX @ 1600
- Graphics Card(s)
- XFX GTS250 512mb
- Sound Card
- Asus Xonar D2X
- Monitor(s) Displays
- HP lp2475w
- Screen Resolution
- 1920 x 1200 24"
- Hard Drives
- Velicoraptor 150gbs- OS/Programs
WD Black 640gbs-Music/Pictures/Cache/Temp Files
- PSU
- Corsair 750
- Case
- P182 Gunmetal Grey
- Cooling
- Corsair H60 Cooler and couple 3 speed Antec Fans
- Keyboard
- MS 3000
- Mouse
- MS 6000
- Internet Speed
- Comcast Cable Business Grade :~)
- Other Info
- box built by Puget Systemsback in late Dec 2008 early i7 guy. had it built for my photography work with large raw files from Nikon D700 using Nikon NX2 and some lite music work from bundle that came with Xonar card.... Sonar, Ableton, Cakewalk, etc.
Stable as can be average around 9 to 10 using Windows 7 64 Reliability History.
chevysales, the comparative you referenced has nothing to do with the "Whole Product Dynamic Test".
whs, why is that the chart you would go by? It only tests one aspect of a product.
whs, why is that the chart you would go by? It only tests one aspect of a product.
My Computer
At a glance
Arch Linux 64-bit
- OS
- Arch Linux 64-bit
True, but this is a pretty important aspect. Other measurements like e.g. false positives are relatively irrelevant.
My Computer
At a glance
Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops
- OS
- Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
- CPU
- from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 2x HP w2207
- Hard Drives
- 5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals
- Keyboard
- with trackball - no mices
- Mouse
- Trackball mice
- Internet Speed
- DSL 6000
There are many components that it will not test, though, that the Whole Product Dynamic test will, such as reputation systems, behaviour blockers, intrusion prevention systems, etc.
My Computer
At a glance
Arch Linux 64-bit
- OS
- Arch Linux 64-bit
chevysales
New member
- Local time
- 10:33 PM
- Messages
- 21
false positives are irelevant?
ok whatever you say.
obviously you have yet to read the "entire" comparitve as refencing one chart and then saying norton was 5% or whatever better is crazy. not even close the entire comparative has to be used as a whole not cherry picking one chart.
and the entire comparive does not think norton is rated like you think. what it misses is weighed as heavily as what it blocks along with how it reacts on a given system, etc.
My Computer
At a glance
Wiindows 7 Professional 64biti7-94012 GBS Kingston HyperX @ 1600XFX GTS250 512mb
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Puget Systems
- OS
- Wiindows 7 Professional 64bit
- CPU
- i7-940
- Motherboard
- Asus P6T Deluxe
- Memory
- 12 GBS Kingston HyperX @ 1600
- Graphics Card(s)
- XFX GTS250 512mb
- Sound Card
- Asus Xonar D2X
- Monitor(s) Displays
- HP lp2475w
- Screen Resolution
- 1920 x 1200 24"
- Hard Drives
- Velicoraptor 150gbs- OS/Programs
WD Black 640gbs-Music/Pictures/Cache/Temp Files
- PSU
- Corsair 750
- Case
- P182 Gunmetal Grey
- Cooling
- Corsair H60 Cooler and couple 3 speed Antec Fans
- Keyboard
- MS 3000
- Mouse
- MS 6000
- Internet Speed
- Comcast Cable Business Grade :~)
- Other Info
- box built by Puget Systemsback in late Dec 2008 early i7 guy. had it built for my photography work with large raw files from Nikon D700 using Nikon NX2 and some lite music work from bundle that came with Xonar card.... Sonar, Ableton, Cakewalk, etc.
Stable as can be average around 9 to 10 using Windows 7 64 Reliability History.
I always read the whole comparative - and that since years whenever it comes out. It is up to the reader which criteria he/she judges as important and which are not. For me it is the "missed samples" And btw, I use NIS2011.
My Computer
At a glance
Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops
- OS
- Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
- CPU
- from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 2x HP w2207
- Hard Drives
- 5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals
- Keyboard
- with trackball - no mices
- Mouse
- Trackball mice
- Internet Speed
- DSL 6000
Overall results March-June and report released.
AV-Comparatives - Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software - Welcome to AV-Comparatives.org
AV-Comparatives - Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software - Welcome to AV-Comparatives.org
My Computer
At a glance
Arch Linux 64-bit
- OS
- Arch Linux 64-bit
