Back to MSE

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 408
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
    Thread Starter
       #11

    gamepro127 said:
    NOD32 is lighter, and works great in prevention.
    MSE is pretty light as well and see the first video. It handled those links without issue. Oh and MSE is FREE.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 408
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
    Thread Starter
       #12

    Some more testing here (I'm bored today - even though it's my birthday, I have nothing better to do )

    System resources:

    With nothing else running in the background (no browser, bittorrent app, anything like that)

    Microsoft Security Essentials - Latest Version

    MsMpEng.exe AntiMalware Service Executable 89k
    msseces.exe Microsoft Security Essentials User Interface 7k

    Total = 96k of RAM

    ESET Nod32 Latest Version

    egui.exe ESET GUI 4k
    ekrn.exe ESET Service 48k

    Total = 52k of RAM

    Interestingly enough, ThreatFire from PC Tools is pretty darn light:

    TFService.exe PC Tools Threatfire Service 3k
    TFTray.exe PC Tools ThreatFire Tray App 1k

    Total = 4k of RAM
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 271
    Windows 7 Enterprise x64
       #13

    TheIgster said:
    Some more testing here (I'm bored today - even though it's my birthday, I have nothing better to do )

    System resources:

    With nothing else running in the background (no browser, bittorrent app, anything like that)

    Microsoft Security Essentials - Latest Version

    MsMpEng.exe AntiMalware Service Executable 89k
    msseces.exe Microsoft Security Essentials User Interface 7k

    Total = 96k of RAM

    ESET Nod32 Latest Version

    egui.exe ESET GUI 4k
    ekrn.exe ESET Service 48k

    Total = 52k of RAM

    Interestingly enough, ThreatFire from PC Tools is pretty darn light:

    TFService.exe PC Tools Threatfire Service 3k
    TFTray.exe PC Tools ThreatFire Tray App 1k

    Total = 4k of RAM
    1k=1MB of RAM right?
    All I have on my system is ESET Smart security 4, no malwarebytes, no superantispyware, no threatfire exc.
    Never had a problem.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 11,840
    64-bit Windows 8.1 Pro
       #14

    1k= 1,000 bytes 1mb= 1,000,000 bytes
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 408
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
    Thread Starter
       #15

    gamepro127 said:
    1k=1MB of RAM right?
    Seems as if there is some confusion here, as I thought it was referring to MB's as well of RAM.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 685
    Windows 7 32bit RTM
       #16

    TheIgster said:
    MSE is pretty light as well and see the first video. It handled those links without issue. Oh and MSE is FREE.
    well MSE is just abusing the .net garbage collector ( i think ) try looking at resource when doing a full scan... it reaches like 100mb+

    I never reached 100mb with eset :P....

    my max was 70-90mb?

    and mse is still beta... who knows how much bloat will be added in the future =D!!! MOAR RAM!!!
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 11,840
    64-bit Windows 8.1 Pro
       #17

    I dont know why you have such a memory drain, but doing a full scan, I'm only using 52Mb ... and thats 22Mb less than firefox ... Im very satisfied with MSE ...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Back to MSE-capture2.png  
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 271
    Windows 7 Enterprise x64
       #18

    For me:
    ESET Smart Security V4
    ----
    Ekrn.exe
    Memory: 44.7MB
    CPU Usage=0%
    ----
    Egui.exe
    Memory: 4.2MB
    CPU Usage=0%
    ------------
    SCANNING
    ------------
    Ekrn.exe
    Memory=44.5MB (OMFG!)
    CPU Usage=About 10%, sometimes 3, one time it hit 50% for a second.
    -----------
    EGUI.exe
    Memory: 4.1MB
    CPU Usage=0%
    -----------
    ESET is pretty much the lightest in the market when scanning, when idle Norton wins though. Keep in mind ESET has MUCH better detection and better heuristics than Norton!
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 408
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
    Thread Starter
       #19

    Tews said:
    I dont know why you have such a memory drain, but doing a full scan, I'm only using 52Mb ... and thats 22Mb less than firefox ... Im very satisfied with MSE ...
    43MB here with ESET during a full scan and the highest drain on the CPU - 25%. MSE in yours is showing 37%.

    Just sayin'...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Back to MSE-capture.jpg  
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 3,028
    Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
       #20

    It's funny you guys are reporting this because I have a similar experience. However, if you look here: Norton 2009 products now work with windows 7!
    you will that he is claiming a very unusual amount of resources are being used (he claims it practically crippled his pc)
    I said in that thread that people are funny when it comes to their chosen av software. They will defend it to the end as if they developed it. I use NOD32 because it's light yet powerful. I don't need/want anything else. it has been working for me for over 8 years and have NEVER been infected
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:49.
Find Us