Fair enough
OK, my bad.
These sort of problems pre-date the current Administration (and the previous one and the one before that, etc.).
Presumably there are policies regarding IT in the US military.
As the Wikileaks debacle showed, those policies are wrong, out-dated and/or being ignored (take your pick).
The President shouldn't have to babysit the Secretary of Defence and/or the Joint Chiefs, though.
If the people below the President are incompetent, then he should replace them.
If they are incompetent and he knows and doesn't replace them, then he should be replaced.
I agree that no matter who is responsible for the original policies, the current Administration should be fixing problems when the occur (preferably before they occur).
I never intended to imply that the President should have to personally conduct the computer recovery procedures, or even an investigation itself. He is responsible for making informed decisions and charging the appropriate military officials to carry them out.
OK, my bad.

However this problem is one that this should never have occurred in the first place...had the President have established an appropriate policy on the manner in which such weaponry is dealt with in the first place.
These sort of problems pre-date the current Administration (and the previous one and the one before that, etc.).
Presumably there are policies regarding IT in the US military.
As the Wikileaks debacle showed, those policies are wrong, out-dated and/or being ignored (take your pick).
The lines of communications between the President and the military are not just some impromptu conversations, in which the President gives some instructions, and blindly trusts that they will be properly carried out. He is supposed to know everything that occurs in the military, above the routine/menial SOP of daily operation.
The President shouldn't have to babysit the Secretary of Defence and/or the Joint Chiefs, though.
If the people below the President are incompetent, then he should replace them.
If they are incompetent and he knows and doesn't replace them, then he should be replaced.
I agree that no matter who is responsible for the original policies, the current Administration should be fixing problems when the occur (preferably before they occur).
My Computer
At a glance
W7 Ultimate SP1, LM19.2 MATE, W10 Home 1703, ...AMD Phenom II x6 1100T, 3.3 GHz12GB DDR3 1333 G-Skill (4GB x 2), G-Skill (2G...NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- n/a
- OS
- W7 Ultimate SP1, LM19.2 MATE, W10 Home 1703, W10 Pro 1703 VM, #All 64 bit
- CPU
- AMD Phenom II x6 1100T, 3.3 GHz
- Motherboard
- ASUS M4A88T-M/USB3 (AM3)
- Memory
- 12GB DDR3 1333 G-Skill (4GB x 2), G-Skill (2GB x 2)
- Graphics Card(s)
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Sound Card
- Realtek?
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Samsung S23B350
- Screen Resolution
- 1920x1080
- Hard Drives
- WD Green 2TB (SATA), WD Green 3TB (SATA), WD Blue 4TB (SATA), WD Blue 6TB (SATA)
- PSU
- Cooler Master
- Case
- Antec GX300 Tower
- Cooling
- 3x Antec TRICOOL 120mm Fans
- Mouse
- Wired Optical
- Internet Speed
- DSL
- Antivirus
- Avast
- Browser
- Pale Moon (64 bit)
- Other Info
- 2018-12-27 Upgraded HDDs
2015-12-10 Upgraded case, graphics card, storage
2015-08-15 Upgraded motherboard & RAM
2015-07-15 Upgraded LM17.1 to LM17.2