- Local time
- 11:55 PM
- Messages
- 661
This isn't recommended, I know. But would it serve any purpose at all? As far as I understand the matter, aside from the wear and tear issue, whether an SDD is 0% fragmented or 100% fragmented makes no difference to the performance, due to the way the information is read from the disc. Is that so?
I run MS Flight Simulator from an SDD (my O/S is on another SDD too) and I am starting to get some performance issues. Some have recommended I defrag the disc - when I analyse it, it shows 100% fragmentation, but if what I wrote above is true, it wouldn't make any difference. Right??
Thanks,
Martin
I run MS Flight Simulator from an SDD (my O/S is on another SDD too) and I am starting to get some performance issues. Some have recommended I defrag the disc - when I analyse it, it shows 100% fragmentation, but if what I wrote above is true, it wouldn't make any difference. Right??
Thanks,
Martin
My Computer
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Custom Build
- OS
- Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64-bit
- CPU
- Intel Core i7-4790K CPU @ 4.5GHz
- Motherboard
- Asus H97I-PLUS
- Memory
- 16GB KINGSTON HYPER-X FURY DUAL-DDR3 1600MHz
- Graphics Card(s)
- 8GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1070
- Monitor(s) Displays
- HannsG 28" & Dell 24"
- Screen Resolution
- 1920x1200
- Hard Drives
- 1 x 2TB Samsung Evo 860 SSD
2 x 500GB Samsung Evo 850 SSD
- PSU
- CORSAIR 650W CS SERIES
- Case
- Thermaltake Core V1 Mini ITX Cube
- Cooling
- NOCTUA NH-L12
- Browser
- Firefox
- Other Info
- Custom PC used for X-Plane 11