Dual Boot 7 32bit and 64bit under Uefi

sadiesan

New member
Local time
5:20 AM
Messages
12
Ok, this has been dealt with in various places but not to my total satisfaction. So bear with me if the answer is hidden somewhere in the forum.

I've got an oem asus with 2 hdds the first of which has Win 7 64 home pre-installed via uefi boot manager. It is a gpt formatted disk. The second disk is empty and is set up with mbr. I wish to dual boot onto the second disk with Win 7 32 Pro but fear a rejection due to the fact appparenly Uefi will not manage 32 bit installs/boots. More to the point , will the mbr variance on the 2nd disk somehow make for an exception to this 32bit 'prejudice' on the part of uefi or simply make matters worse? My bios has a single option regarding a legacy setting connected with uefi which is disabled. PxO... or rather. Gregrocker seems to think obviating the problem with 2 physically separate installs (i.e. Hdd disconnect) will allow a Bios based boot as opposed to a Uefi/Windows managed one. Is this workaround a sure thing and my only option or is there a practical way to go the classic route with the auto boot loader screen on start up? Perhaps a better way to put it is..on dual boot systems is it true that you can't have BOTH uefi and the bios directing the show. You gotta choose one or the other. Frankly, to my novice mind this whole problem seems to be a regression from the XP days. Anyway, a definitive answer from you all would be more than welcome. Thanks loads.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
sadiesan said:
Gregrocker seems to think obviating the problem with 2 physically separate installs (i.e. Hdd disconnect) will allow a Bios based boot as opposed to a Uefi/Windows managed one. Is this workaround a sure thing and my only option

Can you post a link to Gregrocker post.

Why would need to install x32?
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

ME/XP/Vista/Win7
OS
ME/XP/Vista/Win7
@ theog

Which post and how? Dual boot in order to have a backup system ready to go should the first one tank (been there, done that). Secondly, for the odd app that won't run, or run poorly, on 64bit (my oem home edition is w/o XP emulation.). And a possible third reason would be to dedicate the 2nd disk as a non-internet exposed volume for video editing.

@ gregrocker

Thanks for the feedback, greg. So why then after all is it seemingly possible to do my dual boot off the uefi partition? I ask this since in at least two other threads this posed a problem. Is it because my 2nd disk is mbr? I admit I don't quite get the full picture as to what is going on 'inside' upon startup and how uefi and mbr disks inter-relate under a windows managed dual boot scenario. I suppose my confusion stems from the notion that to dual boot you must either go the uefi route with two uefi disks, or the mbr way with two mbr disks. Is this untrue and you can in fact mismatch?

Overnight I rethought the matter and it seems from a hardware security perspective your 'unlinked' separate installs method is probably the more sure one. Which makes me ask what then will happen to the various volume designations? Won't I have two C: drives (since the 2nd OS won't be 'seeing' the disconnected first one)? And won't this skewer the volume names left and right depending upon which OS is booting? Thanks again.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
This is the second time you have quoted Gregroker with no source.

source
http://www.sevenforums.com/installa...oot-7-32bit-64bit-under-uefi.html#post2244007

sadiesan said:
I ask this since in at least two other threads this posed a problem.

source

http://www.sevenforums.com/installa...oot-7-32bit-64bit-under-uefi.html#post2243599

sadiesan said:
Gregrocker seems to think obviating the problem with 2 physically separate installs (i.e. Hdd disconnect) will allow a Bios based boot as opposed to a Uefi/Windows managed one. Is this workaround a sure thing and my only option


source
http://www.sevenforums.com/installa...oot-7-32bit-64bit-under-uefi.html#post2244007

sadiesan said:
@ theog

Which post and how? Dual boot in order to have a backup system ready to go should the first one tank (been there, done that). Secondly, for the odd app that won't run, or run poorly, on 64bit (my oem home edition is w/o XP emulation.). And a possible third reason would be to dedicate the 2nd disk as a non-internet exposed volume for video editing.

You will need two Product license keys.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

ME/XP/Vista/Win7
OS
ME/XP/Vista/Win7
There is much to still discover with UEFI as it is new, specific to each mobo, and challenges much of what we have learned here in four years time. The principle of keeping OS's on independently bootable HD's has worked best overall for normal MBR installs, but whether this works generally to Dual Boot GPT/UEFI to dual boot with MBR needs more results. Have you tried it? Can you reference the threads where this has failed?
 
@Gregrocker

Thanks, Greg. Sorry for delay in getting back. Your answer pretty well sums up in content and tone what I was looking for.. I will go ahead and separate the two systems entirely. I am somewhat taken aback that my enquiry proves not to be as naive as I'd have thought. I'd really have thought that the windows community would have a pat solution for this issue by now. Live and learn. I'll let you all know if anything revolutionary comes out of o my installation this weekend.

@theog

Ok, I see what you mean. In truth I thought you were referring to a sort of forwarding of my post to one of Greg's!? No, I didn't, and rarely do, go to the bother of copy-pasting left and right in the context of a general intro cha for which there was no single source quote that merited citing. Otherwise there'd be dozens of sources to bring into the equation and I think such a lengthy bibliographic recital would only tax the patience of you all more than it would inform. There was a single thread by someone of the name of Marilyn that was never resolved that had some bearing on my issue, but I wouldn't know what to quote anyway. As for linking to Gregrocker's suggestion, why bother? There was no issue to grind nor hairs to split, he reconfirmed a simple common sense suggestion that he's mentioned in the past and I validated it as the better of my options. End of story. Not to pick a fight or anything, but there are times when regurgitated text is superfluous.

Anyway, thanks all and I'll be checking in from time and again to see if anyone's got a thesis as to how uefi and mbr ought to get along with one another under the same roof. All the best and until my next crisis.....Sadie
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
After a few days in snow country and a trip to the vendor of my new asus machine, I'm forced to come back here to square A again. I apparently had overlooked that if I touch either of my hdds (i.e. remove them) it will nullify the two year guarantee on the entire computer. Not a good choice.

Sooo, it led to me to think of a compromise solution that is neither the physically separate dual boot that Greg has recommended, but is possibly also not one dependent on the uefi windows boot loader either.

On a test run, having got the 2nd Win 7 boot install on to a USB stick, the one-time BIOS override screen gave me the new option of booting from either UEFI: Sandisk or just Sandisk. Am I wrong or is my BIOS inviting me to either A) setup my 2nd Win 7 install on disk 1 by modifying the EFI partition on disk 0 in order to reflect a dual boot in windows boot loader, or B) set up my 2nd Win 7 install 'directly' on the mbr partition as it exists on disk 1 and thus 'bypass' the disc 0 EFI partition entirely? The B) route would then necessitate a manual BIOS mbr boot each time from the one-time boot screen. On the other hand, if I go the A) route what will happen to that destination mbr partition on disc 1? Will I be prompted to convert it to gpt or perhaps will even a 2nd EFI boot partition be created?

I know this all sounds rather confused and contorted and rehashes a similar question from my earlier post regarding the co-existence of gpt and mbr. I should maybe just do it and see what spits out. Yet whatever I do, I do want the assurance that my original 200mb EFI partition will neither be erased nor irretrievably modified.

Thanks again guys.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
After another long day back to this thread. Greg, your 'easy' approach to just do it all through the Windows 7 Boot Loader is really just a second option. We'd agreed that ideally the two OS should have as little influence upon one another as possible. Meaning if one disk dies the other would become operational right away, which would not be the case using the full EFI driven Windows approach. I found a quote (Theog will be happy) from the Microsoft Community site that closely touches on what I was getting at earlier. It's about 10 months old.

I believe I understand what happened in my case. Someone on the ASUS forum said something that caused a light bulb to go off. I'm pretty sure that when I installed Windows 7 on this system, I did it in BIOS mode, not UEFI mode, so that's why Windows 7 made MBR partitions I guess. I didn't realize that, at least for ASUS, you turn UEFI mode on by picking a boot device that has UEFI enabled rather than one that doesn't. It was only fairly recently that I noticed that some of the boot devices were marked as UEFI devices. Anyway, then later when I tried installing Windows 8 CP, I booted from the UEFI DVD device (by then I had noticed the difference), and that's why Windows 8 didn't like my MBR partitions. Today, I booted from the non-UEFI DVD device into Window 8 CP setup, and it installed on my MBR partition just fine. So, if you have a UEFI system, make sure you understand whether you are booting in UEFI mode or not.
The difference being that I'm on an OEM system of Win 7 installed in EFI mode on a GPT disk with a second unused MBR disc and I'm installing the second with 32bit Win 7 (or in a pinch Vista or XP3). By the way doesn't EFI mode reject 32 bit installs from the get go anyway?

So does the above citation have any bearing on my problem. Can I confidently get my 2nd Win OS to install on the MBR disk and not have my Win 7 EFI install have a fit or render itself unoperational? Would I get two OS operating out of their respective C: drives that would see and talk to one another yet not try hijack each other? If it helps the comp is an Asus N76VM and my bios is American Megatrends v211 with Aptio. Also would i still need to scrupulously adhere to the following links which seem primarily geared to a single OS install UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) - Install Windows 7 with and UEFI Bootable USB Flash Drive - Create in Windows One of these tutorials would seem to setup a second EFI partition on the 2nd disk. Or am I wrong? Thanks mucho much.


 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
Yes, EFI will reject 32 bit installs.

Do you see a special BIOS setting to use dual EFI/Legacy BIOS methods as I've not heard of it yet.

You can try to install Win7 32 bit to an MBR disk using the non-UEFI HD and installer DVD/USB choices which apply if they are present. This may actually be faster than extended research though I would direct it to your mobo tech support or forums if needed.

Unplug the other HD if you want to try this, as per Ray's comment below. Post back any error message and step it fails in Clean Install Windows 7
 
Last edited:
1) If you have dual EFI/Legacy BIOS setting,you will need to Physically disconnect HDD Drive one,
Than install x32 to HDD Drive two.

2) When installed, to boot the x32, use the one time boot menu.

3) When doing any Startup repairs on HDD Drive one, Physically disconnect HDD Drive two.

4) x32 will only use under 4gb of ram.

5) You will need two Product license keys.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

ME/XP/Vista/Win7
OS
ME/XP/Vista/Win7
Ok, I think I'm narrowing the understanding gap. First off, I don't know if I've got a dual EFI/BIOs boot mode motherboard. Theog, you seem to imply I do. Greg, there is no explicit dual EFI/BIOS setting. I can only tell you my BIOS includes a launch PxE Oprom option which is disabled by default. There is the standard boot order entry of which Win Boot loader is default followed by disk 0 and DVD Rom. Then there is a setting regarding BBS boot options where one can enable or disable the entries at will (perhaps linked to the one-time boot options). Finally, there are lines for adding or deleting boot entries. As things get a bit clearer, yes, I think a visit to the motherboard/bios manufacturer might shed the most light at this point.

Which brings me to the point I most would like to clear up. Theog once again advised to disconnect lst disk before running one-time boot option for the 2nd disk install. As this seems to be a key step regarding these workarounds, I want to ask why. What will or could happen if I try to add a BIOS install of W7 32bit, Vista, Xp or even W7 64bit on the other disk without disconnecting anything? Will both systems implode or will the install just, safely, not go through? Is it an issue of 'active' flags interfering with each other? Or what? The fellow I quoted from the MS Community did not seem to have gone through such hoops to set up his Win 8 on a 2nd disk. Is your prescription an absolute logical necessity or simply a just-in-case optional layer of security (but against what)? Naturally, if I hadn't this worry about respecting the terms of my warranty I would just do it without further ado. But it isn't the case.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
If you don't want to Dual Boot via the BIOS then try the install in UEFI mode with both HD's plugged in. Let us know what happens. So much is being discovered right now since EFI BIOS are just coming online full stream and each one is different.

Problems with Dual Boots in Win7 and especially with XP were avoided by advising BIOS Dual Boot, but new rules apply with EFI BIOS'.
 
[FONT=&quot]Yeah, Ok, you've driven the point home Greg. Even if it's been around a few years EFI is still a pretty vague no man's land in terms of functionality. As I understand it the various OEMS can really fiddle with it to their liking. If I read you, a fully connected BIOS install on my 2nd disk can just as much work as it can fail. I will check out the specs, theog, on the motherboard or find a forum that may clue me in. I might turn the question around, however, and ask what could I have else than a dual EFI/LEGACY based BIOS if upon plugging in a USB stick I'm systematically given a choice as to whether I want to go UEFI style or the regular legacy route? From your experience does such an option exist on dedicated UEFI motherboards? Also, I recall reading (but not noting the source) of a method of converting/adopting a BIOS to become dual. Does this ring any bells? I can also recall my vendor saying that the hardware of my N76mv precludes the installation of windows xp, due I think to the unavailability of drivers for it. I'll have to follow that one up.

At any rate, I'll give the darn thing a shot this weekend and let you all know one way or the other what does or does not hit the fan
[/FONT]
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
I've not seen anything yet on converting an EFI BIOS to accept dual/mode installation. It may be default. You'll just have to try.

What does seem to almost always work if EFI install fails is to Bypass UEFI to Install WIn7. There have also been no complaints yet from those who've done so, while the problems with EFI configurations are piling up.
 
I just found this thread. Asus N76 UEFI - W7 64 Install Hangs on Logo (DVD UEFI Boot) - Windows 7 Forums
Don't know how I missed it. It squarely addresses most of my fears and doubts and is very encouraging. Same machine, nearly the same bios and results to match. The major difference being the OP's intention never was meant to dual boot between EFI mode on one disc and Legacy on the other. He converted both HDDs to mbr. So this will be a bit different. Even if I can't imagine what could interfere. A curious note the OP displayed both EFI and Legacy options for his DVD drive. I've only one. There is no EFI mode. On the other hand the USB stick shows both. Is this readily explainable or another mystery from EFI-land? Well, we'll soon see. Keep tuned.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
Thanks, Greg, for that link. Boy, I really feel for the guy. I'm not in your league of course but did he ever say that the Acer repair attempts ever completely succeeded? I mean is it possible that his EFI partition got corrupted? Or a bug with SLIC 3? Sure he got his Windows 8 back, but he did he actually try to reinstall the thing from scratch after he discovered his ACPI / IDE switcheroo? Just speculation.

You mentioned there that before resizing a C: drive one must delete the recovery disk?!? Could you elaborate? I did same without deletion and there were no seeming after effects. Indirectly related, I made my recovery disks after Windows Upgrade got its mitts on my machine. In doing so, the Asus recovery program spent a good 20-30 minutes 'updating' the partition/files before actually copying the files to the dvds. What could this mean and is it normal, coincidental? I thought 'factory state' meant what it meant.

Tonight, I might try and run the setup disc of a Vista install from my previous Dell Inspiron to the mbr partition on my free hdd, or more audaciously try to copy an Acronis image of it. Drivers aside, if that takes I'm sure Win 7 will too. Any betters? Biggest worry is if and how the mbr installation will see the gpt disk. I understand the latter has a pseudo-mbr sector of its own but not sure if that will allow visibility of the individual partitions. Also, neither you nor The Og have weighed in as to what Windows 7 on the efi boot might see on the mbr disc. Ignore it as data partition as it does now, or pick it up as a new Windows version and try to manipulate into its EDP. Or have I already asked that in another form?
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

windows home premium 64
OS
windows home premium 64
Back
Top