Once again I find myself with 'real things to do' and updating Java. Boy is this a love/hate relationship. Why can't Oracle get this right?
I successfully downloaded and installed 8.25 (avoiding the 'free bloatware' bundled with it.) I ran the uninstall routine and was assured that I'd successfully uninstalled all previous version.
Just to be sure, I closed SeaMonkey ( Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30 Build identifier: 20141013232806) and went to Oracle's (Java Uninstall Tool) and sure enough Java 7 Update 67 was apparently still there and could not be uninstalled with error code is 1605.
Sure enough, I found a recommendation that I run Javara. Moments later I was on the MajorGeeks download mirror and found myself facing an 'in my face' you need to run this test first to check for problems with my Windows installation. Instead of Javara the file presented was Reimage. I backed out. I didn't want to go to the next step of verifying that what I was about to do was legit.
I guess I'm damned because:
a) I have enough technical savvy to be suspicious
b) I'm not geek enough to take pleasure in researching all the possible byways I've encountered in updating a minor part of my Web experience.
thanks,
baumgrenze
I successfully downloaded and installed 8.25 (avoiding the 'free bloatware' bundled with it.) I ran the uninstall routine and was assured that I'd successfully uninstalled all previous version.
Just to be sure, I closed SeaMonkey ( Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30 Build identifier: 20141013232806) and went to Oracle's (Java Uninstall Tool) and sure enough Java 7 Update 67 was apparently still there and could not be uninstalled with error code is 1605.
Sure enough, I found a recommendation that I run Javara. Moments later I was on the MajorGeeks download mirror and found myself facing an 'in my face' you need to run this test first to check for problems with my Windows installation. Instead of Javara the file presented was Reimage. I backed out. I didn't want to go to the next step of verifying that what I was about to do was legit.
I guess I'm damned because:
a) I have enough technical savvy to be suspicious
b) I'm not geek enough to take pleasure in researching all the possible byways I've encountered in updating a minor part of my Web experience.
thanks,
baumgrenze
My Computer
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Custom built by GamePC/Solid Electric - Palo Alto - on 03/10/08
- OS
- Win 7 Pro 64
- CPU
- Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4 GHz) Quad Core
- Motherboard
- Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3P Intel P35 ATX (rev. 2.1)
- Memory
- 2 x Crucial 4GB Kit (2GBx2) DDR2 CT2KIT25664AA800
- Graphics Card(s)
- Sapphire Radeon HD 3870 PCIe 512 Mb
- Sound Card
- RealTek audio on MOBO + EDIROL UA-1EX
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Samsung S24A450BW 24" LED monitor
- Screen Resolution
- 1600 x 1200 at 75 Hz
- Hard Drives
- 2 Crucial 128 Gb SSD (CT128M550SSD1)
one mounted and running Win7/Pro x64
one disconnected containing only Win10/Pro upgrade - in process
1 1TB WD Caviar Black (WD1003FZEX-00MK2A0) (Data drive)
1 2TB Seagate 2TB (PN/ 9JB1N3-576 - ST2000DM001-1ER
- PSU
- Seasonic S12-HT 650W 80% Efficiency Power Supply
- Case
- Lian Li PC-B25B
- Cooling
- Gigabyte Silent-Pipe
- Keyboard
- Dell MS Comfort
- Mouse
- HP x4000 wireless
- Internet Speed
- Sonic FTTN @ 23 Mbps
- Antivirus
- Avast
- Browser
- SeaMonkey
- Other Info
- BIOS: Award Software International, Inc. F6 06/18/2009
System Specs - Updated on 09//16/19