Post your Internet Browser Benchmark

[Mashed1316]

Did the test on Palemoon 3.6.14

Hmm.. that avatar looks familiar, waaaaaaaaaaaay too much familiar :huh:

Hehe. Did you take it from me? (Just wondering)

 

[Phone Man]

IE9-32 vs IE9-64

IE9-64bit is NOT running the same engine as IE9-32bit and it shows.

MS put their resources into the 32bit IE and just token effort into 64-bit.

IE9-32bit



IE9-64bit


UPDATED TO INCLUDE FF 3 and 4

FF 3.6.15


FF 4.0



Jim

 

[sordid]

I ran FF vs Chrome on my local webserver, a very old rig running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
The hardware is top notch, Intel P4 2.80GHz w/ a blazing gig of RAM.
Well, I only use it for testing purposes so it's sufficient.

The results are devastating for FF - they can be grateful the canvas tests is not part of the final result because Chrome appeared to be 10x faster at least.

So here's the shameful facts for FF:



And here's Chrome in all its glory:

 

[Maxxwire]

The results are devastating for FF - they can be grateful the canvas tests is not part of the final result because Chrome appeared to be 10x faster at least.

There was a time when I thought that FF's low Peacemaker Benchmarks were a horrible indictment against the browser, but after I started actually using it I found that it functioned quite well even compared to Opera which is my primary browser and is known to post Peacekeeper Benchmarks over 20,000. Evidently not all Benchmark results translate fully and directly into improved functionality on the internet.

~Maxx~

 

[sordid]

Evidently not all Benchmark results translate fully and directly into improved functionality on the internet.

No doubt about that, mate.
But I could easily tell by just watching that Chrome performed way better on my tertiary rig.

 

[imeem]

IE9 final vs. FF 4 final.

BTw why does IE 9 64 bit is slower than 32 bit? I thought it was suppose to be faster

 

[Phone Man]

IE9 final vs. FF 4 final.

BTw why does IE 9 64 bit is slower than 32 bit? I thought it was suppose to be faster

MS put their resources in the 32bit version and just a token effort in the 64-bit. The 64-bit uses the old engine from IE8 while the 32bit got an updated engine.

Jim

 

[yohoyoho]

peacekeeper

image attatched

 

[Britton30]

Ptooie!

bleah! yuck!, etc. A zero on complex graphics.

 

[Raynian]

LOL. But in real usage, My FF4 works much faster than my IE9 :sarc:

 

[gendoikari1]

Usually I use Opera. I'm still sticking with it.

 

[recall]

Peacemaker

My results

 

[MadSupra354]

I still like Internet Explorer 9 better

 

[Dave76]

Just tested the new Chrome 12.0.712.0 dev release.

 

[MadSupra354]

Just tested the new Chrome 12.0.712.0 dev release.

View attachment 145788

Where? I can't find it

 

[indianacarnie]

Opera 11.01
AMD Turion x2
4 GB RAM

2911 points and I did have other tabs open

 

[Dave76]

Just tested the new Chrome 12.0.712.0 dev release.

View attachment 145788

Where? I can't find it

The Chromium Projects


Click here:
Early Access Release Channels


Look for: Subscribing to a channel

 

[johncc]

Opera edges it

Opera is growing on me; it seems a lot faster than the others - not reflected in this benchmark, but in the user experience for the sites I generally visit. After so many years with FF, Opera has become my default (love the built-in "No Script" & blazing fast image load; hosts file takes care of the ad filtering.)

[I seem to recall FF 3.6 scored near 10 000 before, however, it is faster than the previous release whatever this benchmark says.]

 

[oreo27]

Here's the overall benchmark on all the installed browsers on my system.



Here's Chrome



Firefox



Internet Explorer



My personal choice is still Firefox.

 

[soho1]

My results:

• Could not find result for key 5f4P. If you trying to benchmark another browser please make sure you have copied the url correctly and try again.

Perhaps it did not like the many browsers I have installed.