Show us your SSD performance 2

[ThrashZone]

lol yep great test it gets better repeating it

 

[ICIT2LOL]

lol yep great test it gets better repeating it

Yep Mike but why??

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Because it's whack

It's tells me the crucial is this much better :roflmao:

 

[ICIT2LOL]

It's tells me the crucial is this much better

Hmm it will be good to find out because I have just bought two Crucial's MX 300 525GB and 750GB

 

[A Guy]

Here is mine SSD, after almoust 2years and 0.5TB written data.

0.5TB!!



1Yr 3 Months

A Guy

 

[torchwood]

Hi John,
when you do your Crucial MX300 525 compare it to mine, only 3 mths old
Should be interesting either way,, as im on SATA II.

Roy

 

[StalkeR]

Nice scores StalkeR an torchwood.

Thank you.

0.5TB!!

View attachment 397159

1Yr 3 Months

A Guy

Hehe, yap only 0,5TB. That's because my pc desk was in build in process.

 

[ICIT2LOL]

Hi John,
when you do your Crucial MX300 525 compare it to mine, only 3 mths old
Should be interesting either way,, as im on SATA II.

Roy

Ok mate will do I think it might be a bit of a difference as I am installing it on a fairly new Asus laptop (a year old) I am using now that has SATA III an i7 55000U and 8GB 1600Mhz RAM and currently has the Samsung in it - not that I know much about the figures to be honest.

What will be interesting is I have at home an Asus ROG laptop that has better specs than this machine and I have a spare Crucial MX 300 coming if not already there at home. It has a Samsung 850 EVO in it like this machine and from the specs of the Crucial they are not that much slower than the Samsung eh?.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Some if not most of the MX series have faster read speeds of the 850 evo's I believe
Writes are another story

 

[ICIT2LOL]

Yep Mike but I think the 850 EVO has a 540 read and a 530 write which is only just above the Crucial 530 and 510. Having said that I have been tempted to try the 750 EVO out too because it is a lot cheaper than the 850 EVO and the only difference I can find is the write rate just 10 behind the 850.

What got me onto them is the price it knocked spots off the Samsung although the warranty period is not that great - not that I am going to wear it out real quick

 

[torchwood]

Ok mate will do I think it might be a bit of a difference as I am installing it on a fairly new Asus laptop (a year old) I am using now that has SATA III an i7 55000U and 8GB 1600Mhz RAM and currently has the Samsung in it - not that I know much about the figures to be honest.

What will be interesting is I have at home an Asus ROG laptop that has better specs than this machine and I have a spare Crucial MX 300 coming if not already there at home. It has a Samsung 850 EVO in it like this machine and from the specs of the Crucial they are not that much slower than the Samsung eh?.

Well i hope my puny >> 9 << year old lappy knocks the spots of yours
intel core 2 duo T5800@ 2.00mhz 4gb DDR2 ram

Its built like a brick ****house, (old colonial saying), and apart from replacing the HDD thru choice, the only thing thats failed on it was my battery
Best thing on it tho, the keyboard certainly not like the cheepy ones you get on normal of the shelf models.

Roy

 

[ICIT2LOL]

Well i hope my puny >> 9 << year old lappy knocks the spots of yours

At ten paces eh?:roflmao:

 

[ICIT2LOL]

Well I got the clone done and the Crucial MX 300 (750GB) is now up and running ready for the dual boot (original install on a 500GB Samsung 850 Pro)

The boot was really fast 14 secs to login which truly amazed me and this is the As SSD test came up as in the pic.

The result has me wondering if Crucial have got their read/write figures correct as this is if my memory serves me right better than the Samsung which has a better read/write according to the reviews.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
I Believe crucial's do have a better read it's the writes that are usually slower.
Samsung's are usually balanced.

 

[ICIT2LOL]

Well Mike I was certainly surprised at the quick boot up it was definitely twice as fast as the Samsung drive boot.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Indeed these results are whack I might have to get another crucial :mad2:

 

[ICIT2LOL]

Yes Mike and if you look back a few posts I had results like that with the same drive

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Yep I'll have to fix that this weekend
I do have 2-256 mx100's one is a refurbished that is a replacement from crucial after one died on linux mint mate a while back it now has win-8.1 on it but I did relive the win-10 pro it was upgraded.

So just a little image and ssd swapping going on
850 evo possibly linux will like it better :/

But yep those are some sick comparisons

 

[johnhoh]

Fun having such a fast/small/quiet system

 

[ICIT2LOL]

Very nice John but beyond my mans the MX 300 I am now sure is beating the Samsung 850 EVO I have been using and at 750GB just my size - $238