Show Us Your WEI

[johngalt]

From what I have seen thus far, only nForce based mobos using nForce drivers get that on controllers that have Seagate / Maxtor attached drives.

However, if someone else finds a different way to fix that then I know of quite a few more people who will be happy (including me, cause that means I can go ahead and get the x58/Core I7 Extreme / DDR3 I want)....

 

[I2aMpAnT]

From what I have seen thus far, only nForce based mobos using nForce drivers get that on controllers that have Seagate / Maxtor attached drives.

However, if someone else finds a different way to fix that then I know of quite a few more people who will be happy (including me, cause that means I can go ahead and get the x58/Core I7 Extreme / DDR3 I want)....

LOL, why do you have to wait for that to be fixed to get a new setup?

 

[johngalt]

Because the HD is already a bottleneck as it is, and with the *extremely* poor performance that it gives with the Command Queuing enabled it would make the new set up feel way too sluggish.

Without Command Queuing disabled on my current rig, my reboot time was in the high 80s - with it enabled I shave almost 20 seconds off that....

 

[I2aMpAnT]

Because the HD is already a bottleneck as it is, and with the *extremely* poor performance that it gives with the Command Queuing enabled it would make the new set up feel way too sluggish.

Without Command Queuing disabled on my current rig, my reboot time was in the high 80s - with it enabled I shave almost 20 seconds off that....

So use Vista...

 

[johngalt]

Vista I was getting reboot times in the high 80s and low 90s to begin with - but Vista allows me to install Symantec SEP 11, whereas W7 don't like it....

Plus, I like living on the bleeding edge....as I said, this is now my main, primary, hell *only* OS.... - installed, that is....

 

[I2aMpAnT]

Vista I was getting reboot times in the high 80s and low 90s to begin with - but Vista allows me to install Symantec SEP 11, whereas W7 don't like it....

Plus, I like living on the bleeding edge....as I said, this is now my main, primary, hell *only* OS.... - installed, that is....

I wouldn't let a Beta of anything keep me from getting an i7 System

 

[Snoman]

Greetings all. Interesting info in this thread. Any thoughts on the ram in my results? It is OCZ Reaper HPC DDR3 running at 1333 with 6-6-6-18 timings. I thought it would be a little better than that. Is it due to only having 2GB?

 

[Freelancer852]

Greetings all. Interesting info in this thread. Any thoughts on the ram in my results? It is OCZ Reaper HPC DDR3 running at 1333 with 6-6-6-18 timings. I thought it would be a little better than that. Is it due to only having 2GB?

I would assume the rating is limited because of the "lack" of RAM. Since the specs on those modules are fairly high.

 

[cartel]

FX-60 still kicking a$$
AGP right up there

 

[z3r010]

You found the right forum this time cartel

Welcome m8

 

[cartel]

thanks,

 

[KMoore4318]

More details about my computer
ComponentDetailsSubscoreBase scoreProcessorIntel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 965 @ 3.20GHz7.66.0 Determined by lowest subscoreMemory (RAM)6.00 GB7.7GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1)7.9Gaming graphics2942 MB Total available graphics memory6.5Primary hard disk1844GB Free (1863GB Total)6.0Windows 7 Ultimate
System ManufacturerOEM ModelOEM Total amount of system memory6.00 GB RAM System type64-bit operating system Number of processor cores4Storage Total size of hard disk(s)2795 GB Disk partition (C1844 GB Free (1863 GB Total) Disk partition (D931 GB Free (932 GB Total) Media drive (ECD/DVD Media drive (FCD/DVDGraphics Display adapter typeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1) Total available graphics memory2942 MB Dedicated graphics memory896 MB Dedicated system memory0 MB Shared system memory2046 MB Display adapter driver version7.15.11.7923 Primary monitor resolution1920x1200 DirectX versionDirectX 10
Has anyone recvived a score above 6.0 ?

and how do you attach the page, cut and past didn,t work ?

Processer 7.6
Mem 7.7
Graphics 7.9
3D 6.5
Hard disk 6.0

Lowest score Base Score 6.0

 

[Soylent]

I don't understand... I thought NCQ was a superior technology that was supposed to increase performance?

 

[dkyeager]

Another 6.0 WEI score (see attachment):

Other details: Motherboard is an ASUS m3a79-t deluxe with a mirrored drive and the maximum 4gb of readyboost (although it did not appear to make a difference). Memory is only running at 800, processor at 3.0, factory OCed 3870, but can't support latest ati drivers due to a 4gb physical memory limit bug.

 

[baarod]

No...I have a Core 2 Duo E8400 just like him. Clock Speed IS everything when we have the exact same processors, therefore he must be lying.

Um. No. He's probably not lying. Remember that, by default, your Intel platforms implement and enable thermal throttling. I'd venture a guess that he's got the clock set way to high with insufficient cooling and maybe even has the vCore jacked-up to make things worse. I'll be he's cooking his cores and the BIOS is cutting their clocks to keep them from creating smoke signals

 

[I2aMpAnT]

Um. No. He's probably not lying. Remember that, by default, your Intel platforms implement and enable thermal throttling. I'd venture a guess that he's got the clock set way to high with insufficient cooling and maybe even has the vCore jacked-up to make things worse. I'll be he's cooking his cores and the BIOS is cutting their clocks to keep them from creating smoke signals

Possible, but I don't think very likely...

I'd still like to see a CPU-Z Validation.

 

[Freelancer852]

Before 8GB's of memory...

 

[SIW2]

Hi 12aMPant,

I have an E8400 @3ghz - gets WEI 6.5.

SIW2

 

[I2aMpAnT]

Hi 12aMPant,

I have an E8400 @3ghz - gets WEI 6.5.

SIW2

It's I2aMpAnT, there's clearly no 1 in there...

I have my E8400 Overclocked to 3.6GHz, that's why I get the higher score. That other guy had his apparently clocked to 4.3GHz and his scored a 6.3 I believe. That's why I don't believe how a much higher clock can give a much lower score on the same processor.

 

[rob3]

It's I2aMpAnT, there's clearly no 1 in there...

I have my E8400 Overclocked to 3.6GHz, that's why I get the higher score. That other guy had his apparently clocked to 4.3GHz and his scored a 6.3 I believe. That's why I don't believe how a much higher clock can give a much lower score on the same processor.

I got a 8400 as well and its not overclocked and i got 6.5

Yes i do agree though as drxthirst has mentioned it really dont matter..
We were talking the processor score right