Show Us Your WEI

[meanhoe]

thanks for the warm welcome.

curious but does the site tend to lag often? i've been getting some horrible lag issues with the server.

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

thanks for the warm welcome.

curious but does the site tend to lag often? i've been getting some horrible lag issues with the server.

Not usually, it's very fast at my end.

 

[Nokternol]

Will upload my actual score at a later date however I actually know my score *couch* GEEK *cough*

Overall Score: 5.9
CPU: 7.3
Memory: 7.3
Graphics: 7.8
HDD: 5.9 (WD Raptor 150GB )

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Hello Nokternol, welcome to Seven Forums!

 

[blairseven]

WEI-7.9 Overall.

I call shenanigans.

System spec has red flags. I run my i7 faster that this by .5 ghz and still only get 7.6 We all know the limits on mechanical HDD.

Exactly right, it's no way possible to get 7.9 overall yet.

You need the fastest processor to be twice as fast,
You need the fastest RAM to be twice as fast and running with 8GB
You need the fastest GPU (ATI 5890) to be a half faster than what it is.
You need the fastest SSD to be 3 times as fast.

In short nope!

Are You Sure?

And I Not Sure WHo It Was But In RAM terms im using 2x24 GB DDR3 RAM Kits.

 

[grimreaper]

Are You Sure?

And I Not Sure WHo It Was But In RAM terms im using 2x24 GB DDR3 RAM Kits.

on an EVGA X58 SLI Classified mobo??

 

[KMoore4318]

Would Like some more info on the above post, as I'm running the EVGA X58 classified, and have given up on the persuite of 7.9 untill the next gen of CPU's, the 6 core monsters. My 920 is at 4.3, and the 7.9 eludes me. Even with Dual 295's, Intel SSD's in in raid 0 Mushkin Redline Ram Pushed above 1600, I've pushed it as far as I could, if the 7.9 is lagitment, some system spec's would be appreciated.

 

[cjl2009]

I'm not saying that the 7.9 isn't real, but its pretty easy to give your system any score you want by editing an xml file.

 

[noobvious]

I think people are a little too worried about their scores.....at some point one would hope people could outgrow the whole "mine's bigger" aspect. If your hard drive score is 5.9, for example, it is not the end of civilization as we know it.

Forgive the editorial.....that's just my

 

[blairseven]

Would Like some more info on the above post, as I'm running the EVGA X58 classified, and have given up on the persuite of 7.9 untill the next gen of CPU's, the 6 core monsters. My 920 is at 4.3, and the 7.9 eludes me. Even with Dual 295's, Intel SSD's in in raid 0 Mushkin Redline Ram Pushed above 1600, I've pushed it as far as I could, if the 7.9 is lagitment, some system spec's would be appreciated.

Well I see your using the 761 motherboard, Im using the ez59, but i see no real difference in cpu benifits (, And Are You Using Direct Contact Liquid Cooling FOr Your i7, COnsidering you have overclocked it? This Can effect your overall performance, as just because it is running at over 4Ghz does not mean that it is at its best, i find it runs best at less than 3.8 Ghz.

 

[Lens Pirate]

Well I see your using the 761 motherboard, Im using the ez59, but i see no real difference in cpu benifits (, And Are You Using Direct Contact Liquid Cooling FOr Your i7, COnsidering you have overclocked it? This Can effect your overall performance, as just because it is running at over 4Ghz does not mean that it is at its best, i find it runs best at less than 3.8 Ghz.

problem is 3.8 on a core i7 will not produce 7.9 for cpu in WEI.

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Would Like some more info on the above post, as I'm running the EVGA X58 classified, and have given up on the persuite of 7.9 untill the next gen of CPU's, the 6 core monsters. My 920 is at 4.3, and the 7.9 eludes me. Even with Dual 295's, Intel SSD's in in raid 0 Mushkin Redline Ram Pushed above 1600, I've pushed it as far as I could, if the 7.9 is lagitment, some system spec's would be appreciated.

Are you the same KMoore that I see over at the EVGA forums?

 

[KMoore4318]

Would Like some more info on the above post, as I'm running the EVGA X58 classified, and have given up on the persuite of 7.9 untill the next gen of CPU's, the 6 core monsters. My 920 is at 4.3, and the 7.9 eludes me. Even with Dual 295's, Intel SSD's in in raid 0 Mushkin Redline Ram Pushed above 1600, I've pushed it as far as I could, if the 7.9 is lagitment, some system spec's would be appreciated.

Are you the same KMoore that I see over at the EVGA forums?

Yes

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Would Like some more info on the above post, as I'm running the EVGA X58 classified, and have given up on the persuite of 7.9 untill the next gen of CPU's, the 6 core monsters. My 920 is at 4.3, and the 7.9 eludes me. Even with Dual 295's, Intel SSD's in in raid 0 Mushkin Redline Ram Pushed above 1600, I've pushed it as far as I could, if the 7.9 is lagitment, some system spec's would be appreciated.

Are you the same KMoore that I see over at the EVGA forums?

Yes

Cheers!

 

[KMoore4318]

Well I see your using the 761 motherboard, Im using the ez59, but i see no real difference in cpu benifits (, And Are You Using Direct Contact Liquid Cooling FOr Your i7, COnsidering you have overclocked it? This Can effect your overall performance, as just because it is running at over 4Ghz does not mean that it is at its best, i find it runs best at less than 3.8 Ghz.

problem is 3.8 on a core i7 will not produce 7.9 for cpu in WEI.

Windows will not report Turbo for some reasion, E-leet shows system at 4.3 with 21X206 sometimes 22, in Turbo, still 7.7, I dont think a 7.9 is possable with a 920, which is why I expressed an interest in the post showing 7.9, as I spent concederable time and cash to hit it and gave up, pending new technology, If someone truley hit it, with what I have, I'd like to know more about what it took.
If they simpley tweeked a WEI file, I'm not interested.

 

[blairseven]

Well I see your using the 761 motherboard, Im using the ez59, but i see no real difference in cpu benifits (, And Are You Using Direct Contact Liquid Cooling FOr Your i7, COnsidering you have overclocked it? This Can effect your overall performance, as just because it is running at over 4Ghz does not mean that it is at its best, i find it runs best at less than 3.8 Ghz.

problem is 3.8 on a core i7 will not produce 7.9 for cpu in WEI.

Windows will not report Turbo for some reasion, E-leet shows system at 4.3 with 21X206 sometimes 22, in Turbo, still 7.7, I dont think a 7.9 is possable with a 920, which is why I expressed an interest in the post showing 7.9, as I spent concederable time and cash to hit it and gave up, pending new technology, If someone truley hit it, with what I have, I'd like to know more about what it took.
If they simpley tweeked a WEI file, I'm not interested.

I'm Really Not Sure Why Its A 7.9, You sound like you know more than i do. Hmmm. Yeah Considering We Have The Same Proccesor? Right, Wait Mine Is 960? Would It Make A Difference?

 

[grimreaper]

problem is 3.8 on a core i7 will not produce 7.9 for cpu in WEI.

I agree.

If they simpley tweeked a WEI file, I'm not interested.

I wouldn't be either.

I'm Really Not Sure Why Its A 7.9, You sound like you know more than i do. Hmmm. Yeah Considering We Have The Same Proccesor? Right, Wait Mine Is 960? Would It Make A Difference?

 

[Firestrider]

 CPU LZW Compression                          104.76 MB/s
 CPU AES256 Encryption                        60.74 MB/s
 CPU Vista Compression                        297.88 MB/s
 CPU SHA1 Hash                                491.10 MB/s
 Uniproc CPU LZW Compression                  52.47 MB/s
 Uniproc CPU AES256 Encryption                30.18 MB/s
 Uniproc CPU Vista Compression                149.09 MB/s
 Uniproc CPU SHA1 Hash                        245.64 MB/s
 Dshow Video Encode Time                      6.47854 s
 Total Run Time 00:01:33.68

Disk  Sequential 64.0 Read                   55.61 MB/s          5.5
Disk  Random 16.0 Read                       1.11 MB/s          3.2
Responsiveness: Average IO Rate              7.14 ms/IO          4.4
Responsiveness: Grouped IOs                  11.83 units          6.8
Responsiveness: Long IOs                     33.77 units          1.9
Responsiveness: Overall                      399.34 units          4.0
Responsiveness: PenaltyFactor                1.0
Disk  Sequential 64.0 Write                  62.75 MB/s          5.8
Average Read Time with Sequential Writes     17.083 ms          2.9
Latency: 95th Percentile                     86.935 ms          1.9
Latency: Maximum                             243.317 ms          7.2
Average Read Time with Random Writes         30.766 ms          1.9
Total Run Time 00:03:03.10

I think you guys should just run "winsat cpuformal" (or whatever test) with cmd/powershell instead of looking at 1.0-7.9 subscores. This will give much better precision on how well a subsystem is performing.

With the new Westmere processors, AES256 encryption is accelerated with AES-NI instructions. I would like to see someone with a 32 nm i3/i5 processor post scores

 

[hunuok]

My score!

I have 2 Samsung Spinpoint F3 1Tb in RAID 0 giving me an average read of ~240Mbs but I still get a score of 6.0.....

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Hello Rubbersalt, welcome to Seven Forums!