hackerman1
New member
- Local time
- 4:45 PM
- Messages
- 759
EDIT: i noticed that Online Armor is missing on Matousec´s list, which is most probably because there is now a new version of Online Armor that haven´t been tested yet with the new "148-test".
well the real reason Online Armor is missing is a bit murky... Online Armor temporarily disqualified
i say murky because emsisoft the current owners of OA has this to say
THANKS A LOT thathagat !
that was VERY interesting reading !
hmmm, i have also been wondering why Matousec continues to test firewalls on XP, when Vista has been there for years, and W7 was released a year ago....
anyway, i´ve tested Online Armor myself, and it passed both Comodos LeakTest (CLT) & CPIL.
the last time i tested Comodo, it didn´t pass CPIL...
so Online Armor is really good.
i´m going to start testing some more firewalls (and HIPS) on W7, not on XP....
My Computer
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Dell
- OS
- W7-Enterprise + WS-2008 (Converted to Workstation)
- CPU
- P4 2,4GHz (at 1,8GHz, "slow" RDRAM, only 400MHz FSB...)
- Motherboard
- Intel 850E
- Memory
- 2GB
- Graphics Card(s)
- NVIDIA QUADRO2 PRO 64MB
- Sound Card
- Yes
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Dell 1702FP
- Screen Resolution
- 1280x1024
- Hard Drives
- Yes
- PSU
- Yes
- Case
- Yes
- Cooling
- Yes
- Keyboard
- Yes
- Mouse
- Yes, and i also have Cats...
- Internet Speed
- University: 100 MBit/s, Home: UMTS 7,2 MBit/s
- Other Info
- W7 on a DINOSAUR: P2 with 266MHz CPU & 160MB RAM