I never used Vista. I understand it was the basic format for Windows 7.
Windows 7 was just a big SP-2 Update for Vista and then renamed.
Just my thoughts for a non-Vista user.
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 10 Pro. 64/ version 1709 Windows 7 Pr...Intel i7-6800K @ 4.3Corsair Platinum 16 gig @2400EVGA GTX 1070 OC
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Home made Desktop
OS
Windows 10 Pro. 64/ version 1709 Windows 7 Pro/64
CPU
Intel i7-6800K @ 4.3
Motherboard
ASUS X-99 Deluxe II
Memory
Corsair Platinum 16 gig @2400
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA GTX 1070 OC
Monitor(s) Displays
Asus 27" LED LCD/VE278Q
Screen Resolution
1920-1080 or 1280-720 HDMI
Hard Drives
INTEL SSD 730-240 Gb Sata 3.0/
PSU
EVGA Platium 1200W
Case
Phanteks Luxe Tempered Glass 8 fans/ one radiator
Cooling
XSPC/ Water Cooled CPU
Keyboard
Das 4 Professional
Mouse
Logitech M705/MX Anywhere 2-S
Internet Speed
100 mbits
Antivirus
Microsoft Security Essentials/ Malwarebytes Premium 3.0/ SAS
Browser
I.E. 11 default/Firefox/ ISP Time Warner Cable/Spectrum
Other Info
LG BluRay Burner/
Sound system-KLipsch-THX/
Icy Dock ssd Hot Swap bays.
I never used Vista. I understand it was the basic format for Windows 7.
Windows 7 was just a big SP-2 Update for Vista and then renamed.
Just my thoughts for a non-Vista user.
There may be something to the theory they released Vista before it was ready, like a sacrificial lamb. The idea being that any Windows release would be compared to XP. By injecting the dead dog Vista, in the interregnum, Windows 7 would be compared to Vista. Tough to lose because W7 is Vista only fixed with some eye candy and window placement gimmicks added. In fact it almost seemed like Vista Pre SP1 was deliberately detuned with slow file copy to boot.
Samsung 128GB 840 Pro SSD (1),
Samsung 4TB 850 EVO SSDs (4)
Samsung 4TB 850 EVO SSDs (16) external backup drives used in 2.5" hot swap bays in the computer.
PSU
Corsair HX750w
Case
Antec Two Hundred v2 (modified)
Cooling
Cooler Master GeminII S524 120mm (fan replaced with a 140mm)
Nah, I don't think so. They just did a bad job controlling the device manufacturers drivers - because the drivers were 80% of the problems. And they also did not advise the OEMs to ship systems with at least 2GB of RAM - or the OEMs ignored that. Many devices did not even have Vista drivers - like a router I bought. I spent 3 hours on the phone to get that going. But that was not the problem of Vista.
I have seen OPs coming on forums with Vista Ultimate on 512MB machines. No wonder those systems were crawling. The wife came home one day with a 1GB laptop. First thing I did is upgrade it to 2GB which was the maximum the board allowed.
My Computer
At a glance
Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops
Win-7-Pro64bit 7-H-Prem-64biti7-5930K 2nd i9-9940x both water blocked VRM'...Trident-z 3200C14 2nd Trident-z 3600C16EVGA 1080ti ftw3 2nd Titan Xp both water blocked
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom assembled by me :}
OS
Win-7-Pro64bit 7-H-Prem-64bit
CPU
i7-5930K 2nd i9-9940x both water blocked VRM's too
2nd ASUS X299 Apex/Intel i9-9940x with Custom water loop/7H-Prem-x64/Corsair 450D case/Ram Trident-z 3600C16 4x8gb / Samsung970Evo plus 500gb SSD/Dual ssd EZ swap evo/PSU EVGA SuperNova 1200w-P2 80+Platinum/GPU Titan Xp /8-ML-140 on push-pull on 2-280GTX rads
Yeah, about my earlier comment. Maybe I'm getting old, but I'm still only 18. I only thought about the xp to vista release, didn't look at the older releases. And time does go faster when one gets older. It's like Windows 8 and 8.1 just was released and now Windows 9 is announced. I also remember the time vista was released, people were not happy, lol.
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 x64 Home Premium SP1Intel Pentium 6100 dual core4GBATI mobility radeon 5470, 512 MB RAM
Note that in my previous post I mentioned "major" releases, which by all normal standards Windows 8.1 was not. Microsoft has not announced a date for the release of Windows 9. April 2015 (which is more than a year away) is only a guess which may be wide of the mark.
When you look at the big picture the big gap between XP and Vista was highly unusual and outside the general pattern.
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 Pro 64 bitXeon W35208 GBNvidia Geforce 210
I agree completely. I'm prepared to hold onto W7 as long as I can till they come out with a good OS. I hope it'll be W9.
It's going to have to go a ways to beat W7 though.
I don't see a reason up upgrade (or go for a later o/s) unless there's a feature or specific reason to do do so.
NT built in VB > XP > built in DotNet (notyet)
Vista > all processors started by default (or nearly all)
Win7 > streamlined (worked out how to started the processors as needed)
Win8 > really cut back (more interested in pay per use)
Win8.1 > don't care win8.2 > still don't care.
Look at the kernel versions between all these...
Besides the pretty(or not so) graphics.
12 years later it is often forgotten that when XP was introduced it was far from being an overwhelming success. It was in fact much criticized by industry "experts", some of whom no doubt expected it to be a flop. See this article by Ed Bott for more: Remembering Windows XP's early days | ZDNet
Over the years there have been many predictions of which operating systems will succeed and which ones will fail. I care little for these predictions because I have lived long enough to see many expert predictions that have been very wrong. Pick any of the most successful operating systems and there were experts who predicted it would be a flop. Only time will tell. Until then it is all just guesses.
My Computer
At a glance
Windows 7 Pro 64 bitXeon W35208 GBNvidia Geforce 210
I have been around operating systems since their birth in the early 60's. In fact I wrote part of one of the very first OS in 64 - IBM /360 BPS.
When I use this Kinder-UI of 8.1 on my desktop it feels like walking around in one of my wife's skirts in Scotland. It does the job but it sure feels funny.
If I want a tablet UI, I use my Nexus. At least Android can do the job in 256MB of RAM and the UI feels natural for that device. Try to use that on your desktop - it's a mess. I run Andoid x86 in VMware Player. It is no fun.
My Computer
At a glance
Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops
Over the years there have been many predictions of which operating systems will succeed and which ones will fail. I care little for these predictions because I have lived long enough to see many expert predictions that have been very wrong. Pick any of the most successful operating systems and there were experts who predicted it would be a flop. Only time will tell. Until then it is all just guesses.
:roflmao: Sales say something else, even if you don't adjust for all machines that were sold, then had Win 8-8.1 replaced with Win 7 or the machines with Win 8-8.1 that were returned. It doesn't matter how great you may feel something may be; if it doesn't sell, it's a flop.
Samsung 128GB 840 Pro SSD (1),
Samsung 4TB 850 EVO SSDs (4)
Samsung 4TB 850 EVO SSDs (16) external backup drives used in 2.5" hot swap bays in the computer.
PSU
Corsair HX750w
Case
Antec Two Hundred v2 (modified)
Cooling
Cooler Master GeminII S524 120mm (fan replaced with a 140mm)
:roflmao: Sales say something else, even if you don't adjust for all machines that were sold, then had Win 8-8.1 replaced with Win 7 or the machines with Win 8-8.1 that were returned. It doesn't matter how great you may feel something may be; if it doesn't sell, it's a flop.
I agree. It was designed and optimized for tablets, so it might be great for tablets, but not for desktops. W7 is great for desktops because that's what it was designed for.