Solved Why does Intel RST take so long to load with startup?

Magnakai

New member
Member
VIP
Local time
4:20 PM
Messages
160
Intel Rapid Storage Technology, formerly Matrix Storage.

i boot into windows very fast with i7 and ssd ... maybe 4-5 seconds? but then the icon for RST does not finish loading up for another 3-4 minutes. sometimes maybe longer.

take note this is a new, test barebone system mainly just drivers and utilities. registry is is still real clean.

thanks in advance.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Computer type
PC/Desktop
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Your system specs don't help!
Why are you using Intel RST?
Do you have SSD and HDD installed?
Microsoft's default AHCI is better for stability & compatibility
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Win 10 x64, Linux Lite, Win 7 x64, BlackArch,...
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP Desktop & Compaq Laptop
OS
Win 10 x64, Linux Lite, Win 7 x64, BlackArch, & Kali
Hard Drives
Samsung 850 Pro 256Gb,
Hitachi HDD 1Tb,
Crucial MX SSD 250Gb
Segate 3Tb USB 3.0 Ext. Backup HDD
Internet Speed
150Mbps dn, 20Mbps up
Antivirus
Avast Free, Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit & Anti-Ransomware
Browser
Firefox, Chrome, Opera, & VPN
yes i have a few of ssds, and two tied in raid. but u know how in the past intel matrix storage manager could be installed with "-no gui". well i was wondering if i can opt to do the same for RST. Or maybe under preferences RST, i just uncheck the 'no notifications'? will that accomplish the same thing
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Computer type
PC/Desktop
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
I used to have iRST when I had a RAID 0 array. If I remember well it has a delayed start.
 

My Computers My Computers

  • At a glance

    Windows 7 HP 64i5 6600K - 800MHz to 4200MHz4+4G GSkill DDR4 3000IG - Intel 530
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
    custom build
    OS
    Windows 7 HP 64
    CPU
    i5 6600K - 800MHz to 4200MHz
    Motherboard
    GA-Z170-HD3P
    Memory
    4+4G GSkill DDR4 3000
    Graphics Card(s)
    IG - Intel 530
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung 226BW
    Screen Resolution
    1680x1050
    Hard Drives
    (1) -1 SM951 – 128GB M.2 AHCI PCIe SSD drive for Windows 7 and Lubuntu
    (2) -1 WD SATA 3 - 1T for Data
    (3) -1 WD SATA 3 - 1T for backup
    PSU
    Thermaltake 450W TR2 gold
    Keyboard
    Old and good Chicony mechanical keyboard
    Mouse
    Logitech mX performance - 9 buttons (had to disable some)
    Internet Speed
    500Mb/s
    Browser
    Firefox 64
    Other Info
    TinyWall firewall
  • At a glance

    Windows 7 Proi7-4500U 800MHz to 3.0GHz(4+4)G DDR3 1600IG intel 4400 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
    Computer type
    Laptop
    System Manufacturer/Model Number
    Asus Q550LF
    OS
    Windows 7 Pro
    CPU
    i7-4500U 800MHz to 3.0GHz
    Motherboard
    Asus Q550LF
    Memory
    (4+4)G DDR3 1600
    Graphics Card(s)
    IG intel 4400 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
    Sound Card
    Realtek
    Monitor(s) Displays
    LG Display LP156WF4-SPH1
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    BX500 120G SSD for Windows and programs +
    1T HDD for data
    Internet Speed
    500 Mb/s
    Browser
    Firefox
    Other Info
    TinyWall firewall
Hello all,

i have resolved the matter. i was of the opinion that IRST starts up slow on my pc because of the CONSOLE. but it's not true, in fact, the drivers themselves take a moment to kick-in like what megahertz said. what i was looking for was a way to test with a NO GUI version, if it exists, - it does in fact exist, so that i can find out if driver loading times would speed up.

in future if anyone wants to install IRST without console, the switch is "-NOIRSTGUI". For older Intel Matrix Storage Manager, the switch was just "-NOGUI".

my ICH-series host controllers are not BIOS raid-capable, but that does not stop me from operating OS Raid if i have at least 3 physical drives in my system (1 for non-raid OS, 2 tied in winraid 0 striping).

i'm not sure if Microsoft's default AHCI is better for stability & compatibility, i beg to differ maybe that warrants further discussion because i do not have sufficient knowledge on sata-operation to discuss that matter. there is however sufficient mention online to support the fact that IRST operates as good drivers for oem sata-operation which do not come with their own specific AHCI drivers. since AHCI is just a management interface, especially if i am opting for a system to operate a specific Win 7 build with no further win update (i do not intend to update past Win 7 Ultimate 6.1 Build 7601 SP1).

i think for this reason in older systems OEM supplies IRST in their bunch of recommended drivers. it should be noted that i did not seek out IRST drivers on my own initially, but was in fact installing the one provided OEM.

Now however, i downloaded the most recent driver applicable to my i7 generation. This forum site & topic was particularly useful to me :-
Forum - Intel RST/RSTe Drivers (newest: v16.5.5.1040 WHQL/v5.5.0.1334 WHQL)

***

now, i start my machine, takes about same time to load into desktop 4-5 secs (not that bad for true quadcore [4 actual physical cores] i7, 16gb patriot viper, SSD from slower optical drive slot but still pretty ok), but the IRST in system tray still takes some time to 'ready', as before. at least several minutes. as i mentioned my system is AHCI winraiding, the IRST console matters little to me, it would be more of a diagnostic tool since i am not really open to any real raid options. so good, i got rid of the GUI. and i feel, i got better.. more applicable.. newer drivers.

the driver loading times however, no choice i guess.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Computer type
PC/Desktop
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Back
Top