I think the best way to decide is to go to your local computer store and get them to set up a 27-inch monitor, and then choose the distance that seems best for you.
I go with Andy's advice on the 23" 120Hz too. It will be able to display some 3D content, but the 60Hz can't.
lol.
Hi guys, i'm just looking for opinions.
It's time to buy a new monitor (in time for BF3) and i have been agonising over a ~23" or 27" (i'm only looking at TN, 120hz for FPS). Unfortunately, all the 27" TN panels are 1080, and not a higher res.
There's a fair amount of debate about whether 27" for the PC viewing distance is simply too big. I'm inclined to agree, especially if the content being viewed is not 1080.
I sit about 80cm, and i believe that is fine for 1080, but not for anything less.
Pity there are no 25" ones - i'm sure that'd fit the bill perfectly![]()
The monitor does the refreshing, i.e. draws a picture 60 or 120 times per second. It looks smoother especially with games and video. GFX cards run much faster than that. The 120Hz is really a newer animal and will allow some 3D possible since it runs twice as fast as a 60Hz, allowing for processing the 2nd 3D view picture.Why is a 120 Hz monitor better?
My PC and the half-dozen others over the years have only run at either 60 Hz or 85 Hz (if possible). Never 120 Hz.
What video card can refresh at 120 Hz???
It has a max resolution of 2560x1600.