I would like to point out until this year Notebooks had a limit of 3 GB ram
and 4 GB ram from just a year ago, also many now have a Cap of 8 GB few go higher, this need for more and more RAM is something that should not be because it tends to be because of Lazy programing
Yes everyone knows that, but the point I'm making is that you won't see a significant benefit without enough RAM ram ram...:roflmao::roflmao:
And you know How? I think you miss the point that a 64 bit will talk faster to the software then a 32 bit You do not hit a performance wall just by ram alone it depends on more factors, your just making a generalization not based on real performance but probably fault ridden PC scores.......... these PC scores are not real life performance.
My Computer
At a glance
Win 7 7100
OS
Win 7 7100
Other Info
OS Name Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Version 6.1.7077 Build 7077
Other OS Description Not Available
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System Name DRBILL-PC
System Manufacturer Dell Inc.
System Model Latitude D420
System Type X86-based PC
Processor Genuine Intel(R) CPU U2500 @ 1.20GHz, 1200 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s)
BIOS Version/Date Dell Inc. A06, 2/2/2008
SM
I said you won't see a significant difference, not no difference. I know because I had 2.2 Core2Duo, 3GB RAM, and I couldn't tell the difference between 32-bit/64-bit but it doesn't mean there wasn't any. The OP has 2GB, so the difference may not be noticable.
If you want potentially a very small performance increase with 2GB RAM 64-bit, then go ahead and try it. Just don't be surprised if at times your computer seems very slightly faster, or other times when your computer seems very slightly slower.