Linuzo is back with Build 6956

[linuzo]

Hey Everyone,

I was able to obtain a copy of the new build and I admit the 6801 installer was confusing at first. However it is preinstalled with the new toolbar and newer patches as I have noticed in the windows folder. I went back to linux for a bit until I saw this new version of Windows 7 and even some viewers showing better performance in this version of win7 then winxp. However the ability to run more then 4GB of ram on xp is impossible so here i am with Win7 and it detected all 6GB fine.

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Hello linuzo.

Have a look at this.

http://www.sevenforums.com/system-security/973-w32-sober-conhost-exe.html













Later :shock: Ted

 

[darkassain]

Hey Everyone,

I was able to obtain a copy of the new build and I admit the 6801 installer was confusing at first. However it is preinstalled with the new toolbar and newer patches as I have noticed in the windows folder. I went back to linux for a bit until I saw this new version of Windows 7 and even some viewers showing better performance in this version of win7 then winxp. However the ability to run more then 4GB of ram on xp is impossible so here i am with Win7 and it detected all 6GB fine.

hello linuzo

as you might know with vista sp1 it will detect all the memory but it cant use it all
only 64 bit builds (im guessing that 6956 build you have is 32-bit...) such as 6801 and 6936 are able to to see and use PAE to get that memory....

Hello linuzo.

Have a look at this. Also have a look thru the SF Team Forum.


http://www.sevenforums.com/system-security/973-w32-sober-conhost-exe.html

Later :shock: Ted

hey ted...
as you might know i think it has been resolved as i know
no av so far has detected it ....
i see this as a false positive...
(check my last post)
this test goes beyond the os (as i mean that it could have been a rootkit..:huh
buts thats unlikely as i see that its a offsite scanning service and it use more av that i have even used
i believe two of them are hardware class av....

 

[echrada]

100% sure it is false positive!

 

[Bare Foot Kid]

Hello guys.

Thanks; I kind of knew it's a "false" but better safe than sorry....
















Later :shock: Ted

 

[linuzo]

Easy solution, just don't use an email client on your computer. Web based for lyfe!

 

[DiamondNRG]

Easy solution, just don't use an email client on your computer. Web based for lyfe!

Uh booooooo on that idea! Especially because my ISP likes to crap out from time to time, then I would have no access to years of email and no ability to compose new messages and such.

Your own domain with your own control over your own email with Outlook 2007 FTW!

 

[johngalt]

Your own domain with Thunderbird and 14 different email accounts FTW!!!

 

[darkassain]

Your own domain with Thunderbird and 14 different email accounts FTW!!!

john isnt that a little overkill?...

but a yes for Thunderbird
or at least till something better comes to my attention...

 

[johngalt]

If I thought it was overkill I wouldn't be doing it

Plus, almost every domain I have an email account with I have an alias account with as well....

So, in addition to my own domain, I have multiple accounts with Google, Hotmail, etc....

 

[darkassain]

same here but then it gets complicated (when you use more accounts...lol)
usually use two or three gmail accounts and one hotmail account...

use thunderbird on gmail and as i am trying to pinch every penny (that includes extremly cheap domains...lol)

and when im not using my computer the webbased form is more than enough for the current need at that moment..

 

[johngalt]

Nope - Thunderbird gets all the mail for each account into it's own folder - and is intelligent enough to reply to that person from that account name...

I even have rotating signatures using (now this is pretty old software) Phranc's SigChanger....

 

[darkassain]

what i mean is that i get confused...lol

nice on the sigs...
though

 

[DiamondNRG]

Doesn't it tell you at the top what account you are replying from? Outlook sure does. I would imagine thunderchicken would have that feature too.

 

[darkassain]

no
what i mean is that i get confused ( i forget which one i use for business for family contacts and so on....)
i should make labels for all my email addresses...lol

 

[johngalt]

See, it is easy for me to not get confused.

99% of the forums and such sites I visit use my alias (johngalt, johnlgalt, and slight variations).

Only friends (and I mean people I grew up with) and family have my email addresses that use my real name (no, john is not my real name - I'm Indian, my name is not even close to John).

As for confusion, it is pretty easy to tell - again, since each email address has its own set of folders (inbox, outbox, sent, etc) if it is in this particular account's inbox, then replying to it will use the same email address - and if I need to supply an alternate, I use another johngalt@ email address.

Same for family and friends- if i need to use an alternate, I use one of my other {real name}@ email addresses.

No confusion possible, unless I develop amnesia and forget that ht person I am sending mail to is someone I have never met / have met in real life, and use the wrong email address - but that is what reply is for