marcellusmighty
New member
I'm sorry, but AMD is just really... out of it. They and ATI both. Not only is AMD more concerned with breaking a world record (hence, being the "first to do something") but ATI uses GDDR 5 graphics memory... really?!!!! Totally unnecessary. It astounds me that Nvidia's GTX series blows these supposedly "awesome" GDDR 5 chips out of the water, just as much as it astounds me that Intel's Core i7 can blow the latest AMD fiasco out of the water. For me, my Core 2 Duo overclocked to 2.97 from 2.4 is incredible. No problems, no... noticeable anything. The last time I had an AMD, I had to take the tower into Computer Renaissance (now bankrupt) and have them fix it up on more than one occasion.
My Computer
- OS
- Windows 7 x64 Build 7100
- CPU
- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4 GHz. ~ 2.97 GHz.
- Motherboard
- BIOSTAR Intel G965 Micro 775 V 5.0
- Memory
- 1 x 2 GB G. Skill 800 MHz. (1.8-1.9 V., 5-5-5-15)
- Graphics Card(s)
- NVidia GeForce 9800 GTX+ 512 MB
- Sound Card
- REALTEK Integrated HD Audio
- Monitor(s) Displays
- X2GEN 19" LCD Widescreen
- Screen Resolution
- 1440x900
- Hard Drives
- Seagate 320 GB PATA (238 GBs allocated to Windows 7, 55.3 GBs allocated to Windows XP)
- Case
- RAIDMAX Ninja
- Cooling
- 3 Case fans, stock CPU cooler
- Keyboard
- Nexxtech Wireless Keyboard
- Mouse
- Nexxtech Wireless Mouse
- Internet Speed
- DSL 768k