I found the comments I was referring to regarding Macrium vs. Paragon. Though they are in the thread "Acronis vs Paragon backup software", the posts are speaking about Macrium problems.
http://www.sevenforums.com/backup-restore/53282-acronis-vs-paragon-backup-software-4.html
There read post #33-36 or so.
Some of it has to do with restoring to a smaller partition, something previously discussed here. But the line which really caught my eye was this:
"But irrespective of mismatched HDD sizes, Macrium Free apparently doesn't get it right... doesn't actually write a bootable and activatable system partition [Windows 7] so you have an exact copy of your prior setup. Good for backing up miscellaneous files and such, but not bootable/activated etc."
While I'm very familiar with Ghost and Acronis T.I., I'm a total "newbie" to Macrium (and for that matter to Paragon and EaseUS). As such, I found the above quote very troubling. So if moving to a smaller drive isn't it, what the heck is being said there?
http://www.sevenforums.com/backup-restore/53282-acronis-vs-paragon-backup-software-4.html
There read post #33-36 or so.
Some of it has to do with restoring to a smaller partition, something previously discussed here. But the line which really caught my eye was this:
"But irrespective of mismatched HDD sizes, Macrium Free apparently doesn't get it right... doesn't actually write a bootable and activatable system partition [Windows 7] so you have an exact copy of your prior setup. Good for backing up miscellaneous files and such, but not bootable/activated etc."
While I'm very familiar with Ghost and Acronis T.I., I'm a total "newbie" to Macrium (and for that matter to Paragon and EaseUS). As such, I found the above quote very troubling. So if moving to a smaller drive isn't it, what the heck is being said there?
My Computer
- OS
- Windows 7 Home x64