Post your Internet Browser Benchmark

[oreo27]

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

 

[Subsonic]

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Hi Oreo27,

Had never heard of Pale Moon before. Pretty nice. Thanks for posting!

 

[oreo27]

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Hi Oreo27,

Had never heard of Pale Moon before. Pretty nice. Thanks for posting!

It's indeed great mate. Just a bit of better performance from Firefox. I discovered it from a member in the Forums I moderate in.

This reminds me, I still have yet to do a benchmark at home

 

[architect]

here is my score..

hi,
here are my scores, not knowing what they exactly mean....
i only know, that chrome 10 is very fast in my opinion...

 

[oreo27]

Well, as an update. I'm posting three browsers.

Firefox 3.6.13, again is not Firefox, It is Pale Moon. Chrome owned in this benchmark but I still prefer Pale Moon.

 

[Gornot]

Subjectively speaking, this is a colossal improvement, even when compared to the official beta:



IE 9.0.8073.6003

 

[snit3]

Win 7-64 Pro, just installed IE-9

 

[wds7]

From Chrome 8 = 3500 ..to chrome 9 ....: Much faster ....;

 

[snit3]

Just installed Chrome on this machine alongside IE-9. Interesting comparison!

 

[imeem]

Chrome 9 vs. Chrome 8.

Chrome 8 won the first 3 test and Chrome 9 won the last 3 test.

OCing my video card barely did anything to the score.

 

[stve]

imeem : OCing my video card barely did anything to the score.

From the Peacekeeper FAQ

What factors affect the score?

Other than the browser itself, the most significant factor affecting the score is the type of CPU in your PC. After that, the power of your graphics card affects the result somewhat, though mostly in situations where the card is very slow, or no drivers have been installed for it. Running other applications that consume system resources at the same time as the benchmark is running will naturally affect the score. The size of the viewable browser area also affects the score, so the screen resolution you use, the size of the browser window and whether the window is minimized affect the score as well. Beyond these, other factors are usually not significant. Your internet connection speed and network latency do not influence the score in any way.

 

[Gornot]

Subjectively speaking, this is a colossal improvement, even when compared to the official beta:

View attachment 136676

IE 9.0.8073.6003

Update: And here's the RC

 

[Ciara]

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

 

[valdir]

Hi, here's my IE9 RC score, I think it's OK

 

[Chiumiento]

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

I want to see a benchmark for this browser.

 

[Chiumiento]

The one that says firefox is actually A browser called Pale Moon. It is based on firefox but supposed to be faster.

 

[GeneO]

Anybody have the IE9 RC compared to the latest Frirefox beta (beta 11 or pre12) on the same system?

 

[Lava King]

Hmm...I'm unable to get to Peacekeeper or any FutureMark page.


Not trying to muddy the waters or anything, but this thread made me curious so I searched for some alternatives.
Sunspider 0.9.1 goes through its tests rather quickly so I ran it on several different machines using different browsers with startling results.

Test scores are in milliseconds, lower numbers are better.

This machine:
Core 2 Duo E8500 3.1 GHz
4 GB Ram
BFG 9800 GT OC graphics
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
WD Scorpio Black 1 TB hdd
IE8 score: 3673.2 ms
Chrome: 222.1 ms

Apple MacBook Pro 2010
Core i5 2.4 GHz
4 GB Ram
GT 330 graphics
Mac OSX 10.6.6
Safari: 315.0 ms
Firefox: 799.7 ms

Toshiba Satellite A305-S6848
AMD Turion TL-60 2.0 GHz
3 GB Ram
ATI x1300 graphics
Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit
IE8: 8732.5 ms
Chrome: 491.4 ms

AMD Athlon x2 4000+
2 GB ram
ATI on-board graphics
Ubuntu 10.04
Firefox: 1724.1 ms

So, what does all this mean? Probably not much in the grand scheme of things. I'll keep trying Peacekeeper and post back when it becomes available.

Kent

 

[stve]

IE 9 RC is not completing Peacekeeper its getting hung up on the string section.

The Sunspider benchmark is not very useful anymore all the more recent modern browsers are very fast.

The fastest on my PC is
IE 9 133 ms
Firefox Beta 11 162 ms
Opera 11.01 166 ms
Google Chrome 11.0.667.0 canary build,,,,173 ms

In all the other benchmark tests I've run V8 Benchmark
Mozilla Kraken & Dromeo IE 9 is the slowest.

Did Internet Explorer 9 Cheat In The SunSpider Benchmark?

 

[oreo27]

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

Sure

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

I want to see a benchmark for this browser.

Here's the benchmark mate. Firefox is actually Pale Moon. I don't have one compared to Firefox itself though.

Well, as an update. I'm posting three browsers.

Firefox 3.6.13, again is not Firefox, It is Pale Moon. Chrome owned in this benchmark but I still prefer Pale Moon.