The leaked Windows 7 build 7025

[djhallucn8]

Well I can't wait till the real thing is out & we all have unlimited use of the OS.

 

[tilkov]

I cannot find information about changes in the builds (MSDN?), as i intend to test 7 when or if XDDM support is back.

Any changelogs posted?

 

[win7]

Just because the file has not been leaked it does not mean the shots are fake.

 

[ripbox]

The current ISO firm the M$ direct download is 7000.0.081212-1400_client_en-us_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRE_EN_DVD.iso
so nothing has changed there

 

[darkassain]

i agree with damoth

this is a fake ( the installation that is for sure is...)

the screenshots that is for the desktop can be faked too

not that that means that there is no build 7025 ohh no i know there is one but i believe now that this isnt it....

but builds like those are throw away builds....
its called a trunk build meaning this is a experimental build that they will test on correct any errors and compile another one the next week (if remember correctly MS does weekly builds...)

as you know this build (current beta1) was compiled in December....

as proof that it can be faked this is one the commenter *supposely* (its fake if cant tell) having build 7777

i dont think that by simple look you can tell if its photoshoped or not(but we all know by logic that there isnt a 7777 build)....
i myself dont trust PCBETA since all they want to do is get attention...

(remember the 7012 beta they supposedly had.....)
i still cant see why people such as ars and kez have posted this....

 

[djhallucn8]

i agree with damoth

this is a fake ( the installation that is for sure is...)

the screenshots that is for the desktop can be faked too

not that that means that there is no build 7025 ohh no i know there is one but i believe now that this isnt it....

but builds like those are throw away builds....
its called a trunk build meaning this is a experimental build that they will test on correct any errors and compile another one the next week (if remember correctly MS does weekly builds...)

as you know this build (current beta1) was compiled in December....

as proof that it can be faked this is one the commenter *supposely* (its fake if cant tell) having build 7777

i dont think that by simple look you can tell if its photoshoped or not(but we all know by logic that there isnt a 7777 build)....
i myself dont trust PCBETA since all they want to do is get attention...

(remember the 7012 beta they supposedly had.....)
i still cant see why people such as ars and kez have posted this....

I Agree with you, nice fake screenshot BTW.

 

[damoh]

lol @ 7777 if timelines right then that should not be around for at least 15 weeks lol, if MS continue there 2-3 builds a week. Your right about PC beta and generating traffic. It was the same with another site which shall remain nameless during the vista betas. Even today there are certain people with builds of longhorn that refused to share it with the community. I promise you that the RC will be a build wayyyy before 7777. darkassasin lets have a little bet on it ( gentlemans bet that is lol) im going to say that rc will be build 7030, what you think.

 

[Chris34]

as proof that it can be faked this is one the commenter *supposely* (its fake if cant tell) having build 7777

i dont think that by simple look you can tell if its photoshoped or not(but we all know by logic that there isnt a 7777 build)....
i myself dont trust PCBETA since all they want to do is get attention...

(remember the 7012 beta they supposedly had.....)
i still cant see why people such as ars and kez have posted this....

They've been fooled, just like most of us, because of the Windows 7 frenzy. It's not the first time a fake build of beta OS is posted and it won't be the last... If I remember well people got all paranoid when vista RTM was posted online and thought it was a fake because a couple of fake builds were posted online before.

Btw, I've read that if you play online poker, or online betting games/sites, you have a 100% chance to win with this 7777 build. Where can I get it?

Ok... sorry for the useless post

 

[win7]

You all seem to think the shots have been faked just cos you can't get the file? They could of been faked but you can't prove that. I will seriously laugh if this is leaked soon, as i do trust the pcbeta source, ok i don't know about the 7012 build but they were the ones who got me 7000 before any other site so......

Posting your own photoshop'd shots in no way prooves these were photoshop'd, only that it can easily be done which i think we all already know.

 

[Slimy]

They've been fooled,

No. Windows 7 build 7025 does indeed exist. Ars doesn't post news without making sure it's legit or stating otherwise.

 

[lappydog]

All I have to say about 7025 is:
The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

 

[swarfega]

id only download from official MS sites anyway.

 

[Airbot]

All I have to say about 7025 is:
The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

Yep, until somebody has it on their machine and can prove it beyond three pictures then it's all a bunch of hear say.

 

[darkassain]

lol @ 7777 if timelines right then that should not be around for at least 15 weeks lol, if MS continue there 2-3 builds a week. Your right about PC beta and generating traffic. It was the same with another site which shall remain nameless during the vista betas. Even today there are certain people with builds of longhorn that refused to share it with the community. I promise you that the RC will be a build wayyyy before 7777. darkassasin lets have a little bet on it ( gentlemans bet that is lol) im going to say that rc will be build 7030, what you think.

darn i didnt see your post....
yep i still remember the longhorn days....
sure ill give in...lol
(i mean i know that the RC will be before 7777 for sure but 7030 that interesting....)
i say 7040 (wild guess....)

They've been fooled, just like most of us, because of the Windows 7 frenzy. It's not the first time a fake build of beta OS is posted and it won't be the last... If I remember well people got all paranoid when vista RTM was posted online and thought it was a fake because a couple of fake builds were posted online before.

Btw, I've read that if you play online poker, or online betting games/sites, you have a 100% chance to win with this 7777 build. Where can I get it?

Ok... sorry for the useless post

LMAO i guess we will have to wait and see...

You all seem to think the shots have been faked just cos you can't get the file? They could of been faked but you can't prove that. I will seriously laugh if this is leaked soon, as i do trust the pcbeta source, ok i don't know about the 7012 build but they were the ones who got me 7000 before any other site so......

Posting your own photoshop'd shots in no way prooves these were photoshop'd, only that it can easily be done which i think we all already know.

what i am trying to say is that screenshots are nothing these days....
what i say is give me a video (no cuts has to be realtime and of good quality...) which includes winver, the watermark build IE build and MCE version #'s, then and only then will there be positive evidence
as for the thread its here
http://www.sevenforums.com/news/110...hots-emerged-build-7013-details.html#post9737

No. Windows 7 build 7025 does indeed exist. Ars doesn't post news without making sure it's legit or stating otherwise.

i dont doubt that there is a 7025 build.....
what i doubt is that they have it and that those images are genuine....

its fake The one acquired by pcbeta...
http://www.namipan.com/d/7025.0.090...e3c2bb03773c82ce8eb766c459fd9a91f6e4d00a0179c

direct link:
http://img.namipan.com/downfile/3cd...50_client_en-us_Ultimate-GB1CULFRE_EN_DVD.iso
2.439 GB compared to 2.439 GB with the win 7 7000 build....
http://218.93.248.125:8011/NamiRobotSetup.exe
this is the supposed upload....

All I have to say about 7025 is:
The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

read above ^^^

Yep, until somebody has it on their machine and can prove it beyond three pictures then it's all a bunch of hear say.

like i said ^^^^....

 

[Airbot]

Yep, you said it DA. They may have 7025 or 7050 or 7999 in existence but to say Windows 7 Build 7025 is leaked when it's just based on a few pictures that could very well be faked and no one seems to have it is misleading IMO.

 

[djhallucn8]

Its being worked on now or they are on higher builds, & its not leaked yet.

 

[damoh]

i love it when things like this happen. back in the day faked screenshots were all the rage only last week i found along my travels a leaked screenshot of LH5003 lol it makes me laugh. problem is that it generates such a huge amount of traffic that its unreal. this time around however i have kept away from certain places mainly due to the amount of hassle they caused the community with holding leaks back etc... whist i understand that if somebody gets caught leaking they get fired, i completly understand that so then why leak it? hay all i have build 8888 its real good i spent days leaking it but i wont give it you come on give me a break.
So here we are all these years later. The fiasco that was LH has gone and now we have windows 7 and it starts all over again. Only thing is this time, that certain websites reputations are ruined. I have my own source for information, i would never ask for anything to be leaked. I would never put anyone in that position. at least with any luck windows 7 will be out this year and we wont have beta leaks for 4 years like last time.
A while back i remember asking somebody who was a well known whistler leaker how he did it. His reply
One CD burned a day with 20 meg on it. - seriously.

 

[win7]

what i am trying to say is that screenshots are nothing these days....
what i say is give me a video (no cuts has to be realtime and of good quality...) which includes winver, the watermark build IE build and MCE version #'s, then and only then will there be positive evidence
as for the thread its here
Windows 7 Build 7012 Screenshots Emerged & Build 7013 Details

I see your point but just because a M$ employee (maybe) has shown shots it does not mean they will leak the file, and it does not mean just because the file is not leaked that you all have to be like "photoshop, fake" etc, you have no proof, none of you do.

I would rather seen shots than not, even if thew file is never leaked or a proper beta build. We will soon know more anyway...