Web Browsers top 5 tested and Ranked

thefabe

New member
Guru
Gold Member
VIP
Local time
7:10 AM
Messages
4,207
Location
Gulf Coast Texas

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows 7 ultimate 64 bit / XP Home sp3
CPU
intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0ghz
Motherboard
Asus P5ND bios 1401
Memory
8 gigs 1066 OCZ Fata1ty
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA GTX 580 Call of Duty Black Ops Edition
Sound Card
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2zs
Monitor(s) Displays
Asus 24in LCD's 2MS X2
Screen Resolution
1920x1080p @60Hz
Hard Drives
WD Caviar 500 Black/ WD Caviar 200 Blue
PSU
OCZ 700W GameXtreme
Case
NZXT Apollo
Cooling
Corsair H50 CPU/120mm x3 /60mm x2 /Corsair Dominator Ram
Keyboard
Logitech Bluetooth Wireless MX5000
Mouse
Logitech Bluetooth Wireless MX1000
Internet Speed
Download 19.83 Upload 0.97
Other Info
Logitech Z2300 Speakers/ Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones/Avermedia PCI-e Hybrid TV Bravo/Epson NX415 all in one/ 4 Port Powered USB Hub/ LG 10x Bluray Burner /TSST Corp DVDRW External
For those interested in the browser Wars as I like to refer to them. Here is an articale on the top 5 tested and ranked form Tomshardware Web Browser Grand Prix: The Top Five, Tested And Ranked : Introduction Fabe

I'm using Opera many years, and love it, but if I will say truth, 10.50 version is very bad. Maybe it is fastest on earth, but it also have some other problems, and now I'm waiting for next version.
e.g. Tab bar, status bar font smoothing (clear type) is very bad.
after stopping page loading function "Reload image" stops working.
Ther is problem with international fonts. I'm not able to set Armenian font.
e.t.c...
 

My Computer My Computer

OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Core i5 2500
Motherboard
ASUS P8H61-M LX2
Memory
4 GB DDR3
Graphics Card(s)
GT440 1GB
Sound Card
Onboard
Monitor(s) Displays
NEC LCD22WV
Screen Resolution
1680x1050 px
Hard Drives
Seagate 500 GB
PSU
400 Watt
Case
Vento
Keyboard
Genius SlimStar i220
Mouse
A4 Tech WOP-35
Internet Speed
1024/512 Kbps
Hi there
These sorts of stats are relatively meaningless

1) Page Load time -- since first you have to have DNS resolving -- so who says that the DNS servers resolve the addresses of the pages to be loaded in exactly the same way / time.

2) The traffic on the actual websites themselves may be totally different for each test

3) Your own ISP / Network connections could also be affected by the amount of traffic on it -- such as other users when using Broadband connections.


This type of comparison is a bit like applying extreme statistical analysis to TWO variables or working out the standard deviation of 3 observations.

A more meaningful test is would be Security and accuracy of rendering the target websites.

These days just choose the browser you like -- there won't be a huge amount of difference in the performance of them as an end user - especially if you are connected to a workplace LAN where the network can get very busy at "popular times" such as around Lunch time etc etc.

Cheers
jimbo
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom built, several laptops HP/ASUS
OS
Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
CPU
Intel i7 Intel i5
Memory
8GB, 16GB
Graphics Card(s)
On Motherboard
Sound Card
Realtek HD audio
Monitor(s) Displays
Apple Cinema display, Samsung LCD
Screen Resolution
1920 X 1080
Hard Drives
4 X 1TB SATA
Mouse
Toshiba wireless laser
Internet Speed
> 20MB up
Nice piece, albeit as both a Windows and a Mac user I will stick with Firefox it is my browser of choice, and works quite well on both platforms. Basically bench march means nothing to me in fact I truly find them annoying. Worrying about a 1 to 2 second difference is not going to change my life. . .I am still going to be slow in the head (strokes do that to you; some more than others). :)
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP Pavilion a4302f
OS
Win 7 Pro x64, VM Win XP, Win7 Pro Sandbox, Kubuntu 11
CPU
AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 @ 3.0 Gbz
Memory
12GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x4GB, 2x2GB
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon HD 4350 HD Graphics/Audio with 512MB
Sound Card
Realtek High Definition Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
1. Dell 23" SP2307, 2. Mitsublishi 40" HDTV, Hannspree 25"
Screen Resolution
1. 2048x1152, 2. 1920-1080, 3. 1920x1200
Hard Drives
Int: 1 120 Gig SSD i
1 - 2.5" 500 USB External HDD
1 -1 Tb USB External HDD
Case
Mid Tower
Cooling
Standard Fans - 5 fans (very quiet)
Keyboard
Microsoft Wireless 2000
Mouse
Microsoft Wireless Mouse 5000
Internet Speed
10 Mbit (realistically 500 Kbit - 1.2 Mbit)
Other Info
Speakers - Bose Desktop (Excellent Sound)
1 external CD|DVD\Blue-ray Recorders/Players (Sony)
Interesting test... My default browser is FF, yet my best experience is with Opera. It seems like every time I express my results here I get clobbered by IE fans.

Glad to see I'm not alone. :)
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Home Grown
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate (64)
CPU
i7-2600K
Motherboard
Asus P8P67-M Pro
Memory
G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB)
Graphics Card(s)
ATI 5750
Sound Card
On-Board
Monitor(s) Displays
LG W2486L
Screen Resolution
1920X1080
Hard Drives
Intel X-25M 80 Gig SSD | Intel X-25M 160 Gig SSD | WD Black 500MB - External eSata
PSU
Zalman ZM770-XT 770 Watts
Case
Antec 180 mini
Cooling
Cooler Master V8
Internet Speed
15MB - Cable
Other Info
Sissy OC - 4.6 @ 1.3175 24/7 | 18' Idle - 55' Load
I would have to agree jimbo, their are to many other variables involved from user to user. Just thought it would be interesting to share and hear what others have to say about the test results. I'm definitely not suggesting anyone base their browser choice on these test results. Fabe
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows 7 ultimate 64 bit / XP Home sp3
CPU
intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0ghz
Motherboard
Asus P5ND bios 1401
Memory
8 gigs 1066 OCZ Fata1ty
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA GTX 580 Call of Duty Black Ops Edition
Sound Card
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2zs
Monitor(s) Displays
Asus 24in LCD's 2MS X2
Screen Resolution
1920x1080p @60Hz
Hard Drives
WD Caviar 500 Black/ WD Caviar 200 Blue
PSU
OCZ 700W GameXtreme
Case
NZXT Apollo
Cooling
Corsair H50 CPU/120mm x3 /60mm x2 /Corsair Dominator Ram
Keyboard
Logitech Bluetooth Wireless MX5000
Mouse
Logitech Bluetooth Wireless MX1000
Internet Speed
Download 19.83 Upload 0.97
Other Info
Logitech Z2300 Speakers/ Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones/Avermedia PCI-e Hybrid TV Bravo/Epson NX415 all in one/ 4 Port Powered USB Hub/ LG 10x Bluray Burner /TSST Corp DVDRW External
Hi there
These sorts of stats are relatively meaningless

1) Page Load time -- since first you have to have DNS resolving -- so who says that the DNS servers resolve the addresses of the pages to be loaded in exactly the same way / time.

2) The traffic on the actual websites themselves may be totally different for each test

3) Your own ISP / Network connections could also be affected by the amount of traffic on it -- such as other users when using Broadband connections.


This type of comparison is a bit like applying extreme statistical analysis to TWO variables or working out the standard deviation of 3 observations.

A more meaningful test is would be Security and accuracy of rendering the target websites.

These days just choose the browser you like -- there won't be a huge amount of difference in the performance of them as an end user - especially if you are connected to a workplace LAN where the network can get very busy at "popular times" such as around Lunch time etc etc.

Cheers
jimbo

For SunSpider at least, I know that network time is not factored into the results. So the benchmark is pretty indicative of the difference in performance between javascript engine implementations in browsers. Most of the time spent is parsing/compiling js.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Intel WBIBX10J
OS
Linux (Debian, Android)
CPU
Intel Core i7 860
Motherboard
Intel DP55WB
Memory
2x 2GB Kingston DDR3-1333
Graphics Card(s)
AMD Radeon HD 5750
Sound Card
Realtek ALC888
Monitor(s) Displays
2x Dell Inc. E248WFP
Screen Resolution
3840x1200
Hard Drives
Intel X25-V
Samsung HD103SJ
PSU
Corsair CX400
Case
Silverstone GD05
Cooling
Stock
Keyboard
Dell Inc. Bluetooth Wireless
Internet Speed
30 Mbps
Back
Top