http://www.sevenforums.com/security...sky-lab-scramble-fix-bugs-security-tools.htmlKaspersky no1,no system slow,almost protection,not each and everything scan but cool one
I don't think it makes much difference really I run Kaspersky and Malwarebytes for they are worth they have never picked up anything anyway. I do run SuperAntiSpyware on my machines which picks up a few PUP's all the time but it is something that will not download to my android.Hello everyone, I'm starting to use Android and wanted to know if it necessary to install an antivirus.

Android malware is the fastest growing attack these days. Due to popularity, and mostly lack of protection. Unless it strongly impacts performance, I'd think it would be a good idea.
A Guy
Yes well this discussion has gone on for as long as I can remember and really it does depend on who is typing thet stuff intot the machine because no AV is infallible simply because with 50K new malwares each day each one needs picking up and analyzing before it can be blocked and unless a staff member on the AV firm can move at near light speed then there will be a lot of stuff that goes merrily on it's way.
I use Microsoft security essentials,
I also run CCleaner to remove problem files etc.
Then I run malwarebytes free version and have had no problems with virus or other bugs etc.
I cant see why anyone pays for security.

No Laith that is a fair comment as it is a much used one here mate along with a few other add ons to the main AV's.I would like also to say Malwarebytes Anti-Malware but this isn't the appropriate thread.

I scan with Avast (my active AV program), then Avira (no active guard, just on demand), then Malwarebytes Premium, then SAS Pro, then Emsisoft free (you can get 30 day free trial, but I choose to just use it free from the beginning, that way no nags as the 30 days run out https://www.emsisoft.com/en/software/antimalware/). Then I make my weekly Acronis images. A Guy