x64 on a computer with 2 GB ram?

sergiogarcia9

︻┳テ=一
Guru
Local time
12:33 PM
Messages
4,755
Hi Guys...

I just wanna know if x64 could run faster than 32-bit on my computer? My computer has: Intel Dual Core 1.6 ghz, 2 GB ram, 356 mb graphic, and 160 GB harddrive.

Thanks on advance.

- Sergio
 
You need to have at least 4 Gigs of Ram to notice a speed boost from 32 bit
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Home Brew
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate Vista Ultimate x64
CPU
Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16Ghz @ 3.8Ghz
Motherboard
eVGA 750i FTW
Memory
2x2Gigs Patriot PC2-6400 LL
Graphics Card(s)
Inno3D GeForce GTX260 216 SP
Monitor(s) Displays
ASUS VW222U 22" 2ms Response time
Screen Resolution
1680x1050
Hard Drives
SATA 150GB
SATA II 250GB
USB IDE 750GB Ext.
PSU
HYTEC 600W & Thermaltake 650W Toughpower Power Exp
Case
Thermaltake Armor LCS (Liquid Cooling System)
Cooling
Liquid Cooling System
Keyboard
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
Mouse
Logitech G9 Gaming Mouse
You need to have at least 4 Gigs of Ram to notice a speed boost from 32 bit
Is there a downside to using x64 on a 2 gig RAM system? I heard x64 takes up more RAM then x86.
 

My Computer My Computer

OS
Win7 Ult x32 7600
CPU
AMD Athlon X2 4600+
Motherboard
Sapphire 780G
Memory
2GB DDR2 800
Graphics Card(s)
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 1GB
I don't think that it uses more, it would have a higher percentage cached to improve performance if the memory is available and the result is a quicker computer.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Home Brew
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate Vista Ultimate x64
CPU
Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16Ghz @ 3.8Ghz
Motherboard
eVGA 750i FTW
Memory
2x2Gigs Patriot PC2-6400 LL
Graphics Card(s)
Inno3D GeForce GTX260 216 SP
Monitor(s) Displays
ASUS VW222U 22" 2ms Response time
Screen Resolution
1680x1050
Hard Drives
SATA 150GB
SATA II 250GB
USB IDE 750GB Ext.
PSU
HYTEC 600W & Thermaltake 650W Toughpower Power Exp
Case
Thermaltake Armor LCS (Liquid Cooling System)
Cooling
Liquid Cooling System
Keyboard
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
Mouse
Logitech G9 Gaming Mouse
So i wouldnt have any advantage running 64-bit?
 
If you buy some more RAM you would and RAM is dirt cheap these days.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Home Brew
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate Vista Ultimate x64
CPU
Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16Ghz @ 3.8Ghz
Motherboard
eVGA 750i FTW
Memory
2x2Gigs Patriot PC2-6400 LL
Graphics Card(s)
Inno3D GeForce GTX260 216 SP
Monitor(s) Displays
ASUS VW222U 22" 2ms Response time
Screen Resolution
1680x1050
Hard Drives
SATA 150GB
SATA II 250GB
USB IDE 750GB Ext.
PSU
HYTEC 600W & Thermaltake 650W Toughpower Power Exp
Case
Thermaltake Armor LCS (Liquid Cooling System)
Cooling
Liquid Cooling System
Keyboard
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
Mouse
Logitech G9 Gaming Mouse
Is there a downside to using x64 on a 2 gig RAM system? I heard x64 takes up more RAM then x86.

no, your system will use what is there regardless of weather its x32 or x64, the only difference being x64 can utilize more

So i wouldn't have any advantage running 64-bit?

no, the difference between x32, x64 on 2gb of RAM would show no change & if there was it wouldn't be noticeable

If you buy some more RAM you would and RAM is dirt cheap these days.

while W7 is not as dependent on caching as vista was, it still helps GREATLY having at least 4gb of RAM, a x32 rig with 2gb RAM vs a x64 rig with 4gb RAM is like a ''night & day'' difference in overall performance & response times.



:)SK
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
myself
OS
SEVEN x64
CPU
Q9450 @ 3.6GHZ 1.34v
Motherboard
ASUS P5K PREMIUM P35
Memory
8GB 1066 buffalo firestix @ 1152mhz CL5
Graphics Card(s)
Sapphire HD 5970 + GTX260 (physX)
Sound Card
Creative X-FI Xtreme Gamer
Monitor(s) Displays
SAMSUNG 20'' & SAMSUNG 23'' (dual screens)
Screen Resolution
2048x1152 & 1680x1050
Hard Drives
1x seagate 160gb IDE & 1x seagate 160gb SATA
PSU
XCILIO 850w (78A)
Case
CM590 1x 120x38mm & 2x92x38mm / 4x 120x25mm
Cooling
AC7 PRO @ 92x38mm blower, Lamptron military bus bay controll
Keyboard
LOGITECH E110
Mouse
logitech NX5
Internet Speed
2MB
Other Info
its a continual ''work in progress''....
I installed Win7 64bit on my PC (AMD64x2 w/ 2gb of ram) & IT WORKS REALLY GOOD! I originally installed the 32bit version & after a few days of using it I decided to upgraded to 64. It uses a little more memory than the 32bit version but not much more to make it a concern. I did however notice a difference as soon as I started it for the 1st time. The display is more clearer (the point arrow went from big & bulky to nice & tight as well as the taskbar, my background was re-adjusted automatically to not only fit my screen but it looked much clearer as well). I know that these things are small & somewhat insignificant to some BUT it did make more satisfying for me & that's what counts, right? :D So, "Yes" it will use up more memory than the 32 bit version BUT it is very minimal.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU
AMD Phenom ii x 4 Quad Core Black Edition @ 3.0ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte
Memory
4gb DDR-2 1066mhz
Graphics Card(s)
BFG GeForce 9800GT 1gb DDR3 / 256 bit/ Overclocked Outta Box
Monitor(s) Displays
HP 22" Widescreen HD
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080
Hard Drives
500gb INTERNAL @ 7200RPM
1tb Secondary Drive @ 7200RPM
Case
RAIDMAX Sagitta
Cooling
2 120MM Fans, 2 80MM's & Upgraded Apache CPU Fan
64-bit uses more memory than 32-bit versions. Thus, I don't usually recommend people with 3GB or less use 64-bit.

Next, unless you are running apps that are natively 64-bit...the liklihood of seeing any performance difference between 32-bit and 64-bit is extremely small.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self-Built in July 2009
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS
Memory
8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570
Sound Card
Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio
Monitor(s) Displays
23" Acer x233H
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS
PSU
Corsair 620HX modular
Case
Antec P182
Cooling
stock
Keyboard
ABS M1 Mechanical
Mouse
Logitech G9 Laser Mouse
Internet Speed
15/2 cable modem
Other Info
Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset.
I am running 7 ult. on dell 3100 64bt, 1 gig ram, 10 times faster than Vista 32. I do run regvac every two weeks because it speeds up 7. no problem, wish I had a better video card.
 

My Computer My Computer

OS
win 7
I forgot to mention that if you (or anyone) is planning on installing Windows7 64bit on a system w/ only 2gb of memory that it is okay to do so BUT in order to get the full benefits make sure that the 2gb is only temporary! Make it a point to upgrade to 4-6gb of memory (6gb max). The difference is like comparing a 6 cylinder to a supercharged V8. Enjoy!!
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU
AMD Phenom ii x 4 Quad Core Black Edition @ 3.0ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte
Memory
4gb DDR-2 1066mhz
Graphics Card(s)
BFG GeForce 9800GT 1gb DDR3 / 256 bit/ Overclocked Outta Box
Monitor(s) Displays
HP 22" Widescreen HD
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080
Hard Drives
500gb INTERNAL @ 7200RPM
1tb Secondary Drive @ 7200RPM
Case
RAIDMAX Sagitta
Cooling
2 120MM Fans, 2 80MM's & Upgraded Apache CPU Fan
Im running win7 x64 on 2gb. It works better than 32bit. Im thinking to upgrade to 4gb RAM.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Samsung NP530U4B-S02IN
OS
Windows® 8 Pro (64-bit)
CPU
Intel® Core™ i5 Processor 2467M (1.60GHz, 3MB L3 Cache)
Motherboard
Samsung Electronics
Memory
6GB DDR3 System Memory at 1,333MHz (on BD 4GB + 2GB x 1)
Graphics Card(s)
AMD Radeon™ HD7550M 1GB DDR3 (Ext. Graphic)
Sound Card
Realtek High Definition Audio
Monitor(s) Displays
35.56cm (14.0) SuperBright 300nit HD LED Display
Screen Resolution
1366x768
Hard Drives
1TB S-ATA II Hard Drive (5400RPM) with ExpressCache 16GB SSD
Internet Speed
sucks
Antivirus
Microsoft Security Essentials
Browser
Google Chrome (Sync enabled)
The only program that I've really seen a massive speed increase of the 64-bit over the 32-bit version so far is WinRar - the old version was very slow to open, the x64 version opens instantly. Other apps are snappier, but not as dramatically so. But 64-bit is definitely the way the wind is blowing, and there's never been a better time to buy a bucketload of memory. Sounds like a song, doesn't it? I'll have a bucketful of memories please - oh, and Cry Me A River, would you - and be quick about it!
 

My Computer My Computer

OS
Windows 7 Ult x64
CPU
i7 920
Motherboard
GA-EX58-UD5
Memory
6GB DDR3
Graphics Card(s)
GF 9400GT
Monitor(s) Displays
Syncmaster 233HD
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080
Hard Drives
loads
Case
HAF 920
Hi Guys...

I just wanna know if x64 could run faster than 32-bit on my computer? My computer has: Intel Dual Core 1.6 ghz, 2 GB ram, 356 mb graphic, and 160 GB harddrive.

Thanks on advance.

- Sergio

32bits only max to 3.5GB 64bits can go up to bigger as 16GB or more People already moved to 64bits from 32bits also MS already stop using 32bits in the future as its last one with W7 as Windows 8 will be 64 and 128bits only
 
Im running win7 x64 on 2gb. It works better than 32bit. Im thinking to upgrade to 4gb RAM.

Hmmm...I find it interesting that some people feel that it's an improvement while others (myself), haven't been able to prove any benefit between the two. I recently changed my work laptop over to Windows 7 and my laptop has 4GB of RAM. I know for a fact that our VPN doesn't work on 64-bit...so I would have had to use a 32-bit VM to VPN into the network. My testing showed no discernable performance change between 32bit and 64bit on this machine...so I just went with 32bit to make the VPN work without the hassle of having a VM just to support it. I lose the ability to address about 500MB of RAM...but 3.5GB is fine for my laptop needs.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self-Built in July 2009
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS
Memory
8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570
Sound Card
Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio
Monitor(s) Displays
23" Acer x233H
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS
PSU
Corsair 620HX modular
Case
Antec P182
Cooling
stock
Keyboard
ABS M1 Mechanical
Mouse
Logitech G9 Laser Mouse
Internet Speed
15/2 cable modem
Other Info
Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset.
It's nice 2 go with 64 bit right now for the sake of "Future-Proofing Our PC's." There aren't 2 many programs right now that display a significant difference with their 64bit software but just by us knowing what is on the horizon ahead is worth it alone. Although, I have noticed a very nice difference with 2 64 bit softwares: winrar 64bit & itunes 64bit. These 2 FLY on My PC & if this represents the future of 64 bit software than COUNT ME IN!!! :)
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU
AMD Phenom ii x 4 Quad Core Black Edition @ 3.0ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte
Memory
4gb DDR-2 1066mhz
Graphics Card(s)
BFG GeForce 9800GT 1gb DDR3 / 256 bit/ Overclocked Outta Box
Monitor(s) Displays
HP 22" Widescreen HD
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080
Hard Drives
500gb INTERNAL @ 7200RPM
1tb Secondary Drive @ 7200RPM
Case
RAIDMAX Sagitta
Cooling
2 120MM Fans, 2 80MM's & Upgraded Apache CPU Fan
It's nice 2 go with 64 bit right now for the sake of "Future-Proofing Our PC's."
I really hate the term "future proofing". In the computer world, it simply doesn't make any sense. For example, let's say that it takes 4 years before 64-bit to really become a necessity or a mainstay. I'm pretty sure that most of us won't be using the same PC that we are today, and if Microsoft is still on track we won't still be using Windows 7 either, but it's successor.

I remember years ago when people were upgrading and "future proofing" their Pentium 4's to have hyperthreading or going with the p4 extreme edition. 5 years down the road, regardless of which you chose, you are getting your doors blown off by the Core 2 Duo. So, spending all that extra to ensure that you were "future proofed", has still left you with a dinosaur of a computer that you likely don't want to still be using.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self-Built in July 2009
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS
Memory
8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570
Sound Card
Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio
Monitor(s) Displays
23" Acer x233H
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS
PSU
Corsair 620HX modular
Case
Antec P182
Cooling
stock
Keyboard
ABS M1 Mechanical
Mouse
Logitech G9 Laser Mouse
Internet Speed
15/2 cable modem
Other Info
Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset.
I recently installed windows 7 professional x64 on a system with only 1GB of ram just to see if it would work. It's a little slow, but still faster than it was with vista, so 2gb should be adequate
 
It's nice 2 go with 64 bit right now for the sake of "Future-Proofing Our PC's."
I really hate the term "future proofing". In the computer world, it simply doesn't make any sense. For example, let's say that it takes 4 years before 64-bit to really become a necessity or a mainstay. I'm pretty sure that most of us won't be using the same PC that we are today, and if Microsoft is still on track we won't still be using Windows 7 either, but it's successor.

I remember years ago when people were upgrading and "future proofing" their Pentium 4's to have hyperthreading or going with the p4 extreme edition. 5 years down the road, regardless of which you chose, you are getting your doors blown off by the Core 2 Duo. So, spending all that extra to ensure that you were "future proofed", has still left you with a dinosaur of a computer that you likely don't want to still be using.

I'm very sure that it is not going to take 4+ years for individuals to start seeing their own personal reasons as to why they should upgrade to 64 bit. I would suppose that with what you use your PC for there's no reason for you to upgrade... but, as I had mentioned in my previous post: iTunes in 64 bit for windows 7 was more than enough of a reason for me to go the 64 route! Is there a major difference between iTunes 64 vs. iTunes 32? HECK YEAH!! (But we'll discuss that in another forum).

With the demand for 64 bit software I am sure that just over the course of 2010 we will see more & more of them available.

In conclusion, "Future-Proofing" in Today's Terms I feel would be translated as "Having your PC up to speed with what's to come over the next 1-2 years.
 

My Computer My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU
AMD Phenom ii x 4 Quad Core Black Edition @ 3.0ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte
Memory
4gb DDR-2 1066mhz
Graphics Card(s)
BFG GeForce 9800GT 1gb DDR3 / 256 bit/ Overclocked Outta Box
Monitor(s) Displays
HP 22" Widescreen HD
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080
Hard Drives
500gb INTERNAL @ 7200RPM
1tb Secondary Drive @ 7200RPM
Case
RAIDMAX Sagitta
Cooling
2 120MM Fans, 2 80MM's & Upgraded Apache CPU Fan
Im running win7 x64 on 2gb. It works better than 32bit. Im thinking to upgrade to 4gb RAM.

I'm too. My computer has 2GB RAM, CPU core 2 duo E7400 2.8GHz. Windows 7 x64 works better than x86 :cool:
 

My Computer My Computer

OS
Windows 7 x64
Back
Top