Free Imaging Software vs. Paid Versions

[seag33k]

I am looking at Acronis True Image 2011 & Paragon Backup and Recovery Free edition. Basically I'd just like to be able to image my laptop once I have it set up with all the software I want and don't want As far as I can tell, they can both do the same thing with a few more features for the paid versions. What am I missing with the free edition? I used Macrium in the past and upon a restore I hosed my MBR so it could be operator error or that was a limitation of the free version. Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks!

 

[ignatzatsonic]

The Macrium problem was likely operator error, although imaging is never foolproof.

You can get a perfectly usable version of Acronis at no charge if you have either a Seagate or Western Digital hard drive--go to the Seagate or WD web site.

All you get by paying is more features that you likely would not need.

 

[whs]

The free versions usually suffice. There is no need to pay money unless you have very special needs for the additional functions.

Your unfortunate Macrium incident I do not understand. I recovered with Macrium at least 30 times and never had that happen. Next time use the bootable CD of this program to fix the MBR.

My list of favorites is Macrium first, then Paragon followed by Acronis. I also used Ghost for a couple of years on Vista, but that is rather complicated and costs money.

 

[mjf]

Like the comment of whs, I don't believe there is a problem with Macrium (free) and the management of the MBR. According to Macrium it always stores a copy of the MBR for the disk the partition image set was taken from. It gives you the option to replace it. If your MBR had been damaged and you chose not to replace it then you would have problems with a reimage

 

[seag33k]

Thanks for the great posts. It was over 6 months ago so I don't remember the exact details. It may have been that I restored only one of the two partitions since one is the factory recovery partition. Either way, I'll look at it again. Not to get too off topic, but how is the built in Windows 7 create image option compared to the above mentioned?

Thanks!

 

[whs]

The built-in Windows7 option is a real dog in my book. Nothing but headaches. But I am sure, mjf will tell you a different story. In any case, it is VERY retarded.

 

[ignatzatsonic]

It "works" if you want to take the trouble to learn its idiosyncrasies. But the interface isn't particularly intuitive and it isn't particularly flexible.

For instance, it has been known to frown if you rename your image file or move it around.

 

[mjf]

The built-in Windows7 option is a real dog in my book. Nothing but headaches. But I am sure, mjf will tell you a different story. In any case, it is VERY retarded.

I use Windows 7 imaging as my primary imaging tool. I have used it extensively and it hasn't let me down yet. I used it to make the HDD I'm currently using.
I also use Macrium as a second safeguard, and it is at times a more flexible tool. Macrium has also never let me down.
As soon as one proves it's unreliable for me I will get rid of it and look for it's replacement.

Windows 7 imaging isn't perfect and some people have had difficulties with it. Maybe there are Macrium war stories.

 

[SIW2]

All the third party free versions do the job.

They look different, have a few different options - try and see which suits you.

You may find one of the freebies is all you need.


The latest Paragon freebie is the only one to align correctly according to nt6 partitioning rules.

The others won't want Paragon to have such an advantage and will doubtless follow.

 

[pparks1]

I'm an Acronis True Image 2010 user myself. Waited for a sale at NewEgg for $23.99 and picked it up. It has a feature called Try & Decide that I like. If I want to play with something, I turn on Try and Decide and it grabs a snapshot. I can then install that new app, play around with it and when I decide it's not for me, I can simply discard my changes and it puts me right back to where I was with my snapshot. It's like an image restore, just faster and doesn't take up space. For me, that was worth $23.99.

I've used Macrium quite a bit at work for quick fixes and backups of machines and haven't had an MBR problem myself that wasn't caused by user error on my own accord. I've had a few machines not boot after a restore, but firing up Macrium and correctly restoring the MBR has fixed these anomolies.

 

[Mark Phelps]

Switched over to Macrium a while back when Acronis let me down -- image would not restore!

Not looked back since. Restore using MR at least twice every week (do lots of testing on one machine) and have never had it fail me in any way.

The WinPE option alone is worth the purchase price as it can be installed to the hard drive and you never have to mess with boot CDs again. Plus, they've extended the WinPE boot to now search your PC for drivers and automatically add them to the WinPE image. Thus, whenever you then boot from WinPE in the future, you're assured of having all your current drivers at bay.

 

[CGA1]

Another Macrium devotee her. Been using the paid version a couple of years now and never looked back. Absolutely rock solid backups and restores.

 

[SIW2]

You can add any bootable wim to your Hd, Paragon, Acronis, etc - however the auto adding of drivers is a nice touch.

 

[Graham Clark]

Anyone Tried "Rebiit:"?

 

[pincushion]

I've had about the same experiences with Macrium Free edition as whs, restoring faultlessly about 30 times. It was over a year ago that I needed to restore until just the other day when I inadvertently erased some files on the Sys disk and again restored back to normal. Can't praise Macrium enough since it seems so reliable.

:huh:

 

[seven2]

imaging

I too have tried Acronis, Macrium Win 7 native and I am comfortable with Acronis and Macrium.
I never run a restore without the rescue disc and so far have restored about a dozen times, easily.
For some reason, I have issues when I use the program and not the disc.
Acronis has more features and my techy friends like Try and Decide, not me.
I am not an advanced user and if I can restore Acronis with the disc anyone can. I have a license.