Any particular setings in the control panel that I should be using?
I set my v-sync to force on and now in the gpu burn in, I get a steady frame rate of 60fps rather than 155fps which it was running at before, so what you might ask, well thing is even with post FX applied and 8X multisampling turned on, my GPU load was only 43%!
I have read that really you should use Kombustor to ascertain whether your video card is stable, firstly at stock frequencies but also at any overclock frequencies and that the tests should relate to what your usage would be, well surely V-sync is a good thing for that as anything above the V-sync frame rate is just a waste as your monitor cannot display it and its stressing your GPU far more than is needed.
In previous testing the GPU load went upto 98% which is fair enough you are pushng the card as far as it can and being sure it is stable, but in the real world when your running your games the speed of your monitor is the limitaton.
In my case a 1980x1080p HDTVat 60HZ, therefore my usage will ever only require that frame rate, as I say anything else is a waste, your graphics card is working hard but your moniitor cannot display it.
I know some monitors are 100hz and some 120hz, but at full load on the GPU my card was giving 155FPS, which is higher than most will ever need to go.
So another question, is testing this way a good thing? To me if my graphics card can do the job using 43% rather than needing 98% then V-sync is a good idea to turn on plus it will surely extend the life of your card.
I set my v-sync to force on and now in the gpu burn in, I get a steady frame rate of 60fps rather than 155fps which it was running at before, so what you might ask, well thing is even with post FX applied and 8X multisampling turned on, my GPU load was only 43%!
I have read that really you should use Kombustor to ascertain whether your video card is stable, firstly at stock frequencies but also at any overclock frequencies and that the tests should relate to what your usage would be, well surely V-sync is a good thing for that as anything above the V-sync frame rate is just a waste as your monitor cannot display it and its stressing your GPU far more than is needed.
In previous testing the GPU load went upto 98% which is fair enough you are pushng the card as far as it can and being sure it is stable, but in the real world when your running your games the speed of your monitor is the limitaton.
In my case a 1980x1080p HDTVat 60HZ, therefore my usage will ever only require that frame rate, as I say anything else is a waste, your graphics card is working hard but your moniitor cannot display it.
I know some monitors are 100hz and some 120hz, but at full load on the GPU my card was giving 155FPS, which is higher than most will ever need to go.
So another question, is testing this way a good thing? To me if my graphics card can do the job using 43% rather than needing 98% then V-sync is a good idea to turn on plus it will surely extend the life of your card.
My Computer
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Nomad Creative Solutions (Home build)
- OS
- Windows 7 64 bit
- CPU
- AMD hexa core AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE processor 3.2ghz
- Motherboard
- ASUS M4N98TD EVO with sli NVIDIA 980a chipset
- Memory
- 8gb 2 x 4gb Crucial Tactical Tracers Elite DDR3 1600mhz
- Graphics Card(s)
- MSI NVIDIA GTX660OC 2048MB AT 1215MHZ
- Sound Card
- Onboard VIA HD audio 1708S
- Monitor(s) Displays
- samsung 40 inch LED monitor
- Screen Resolution
- 1920 X 1080 P
- Hard Drives
- 1 TB Samsung f3 spinpoint
1 TB SATA WDC green
500GB SATA Seagate
250 GB IDE Samsung
- PSU
- 800w PSU
- Case
- Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
- Cooling
- 1x140mm In, 2x120mm In, 2x140mm Out, 1x120mm Out
- Keyboard
- WIRELESS KEYBOARD/TOUCH PAD
- Internet Speed
- 10.6MBPS
- Other Info
- WINDOWS 7 HOME PREMIUM 64 BIT SP1
Tuniq Tower 120 Extreme CPU cooler