pass thru router ?

[Total]

I have the router (wrt 310n) set up for a internal address of 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120 .254 - can I add a address of 192.168.1.103 also ? or when a computer on the 42.xxx.xxx.xxx network is connected and types in 192.168.1.103 I can forward to that address ?

 

[antharr]

I have the router (wrt 310n) set up for a internal address of 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120 .254 - can I add a address of 192.168.1.103 also ? or when a computer on the 42.xxx.xxx.xxx network is connected and types in 192.168.1.103 I can forward to that address ?

That's a different subnet and you would need something else to handle the routing between that router and the device that you want to get the 192.x.x.x address.

 

[Total]

I have the router (wrt 310n) set up for a internal address of 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120 .254 - can I add a address of 192.168.1.103 also ? or when a computer on the 42.xxx.xxx.xxx network is connected and types in 192.168.1.103 I can forward to that address ?

That's a different subnet and you would need something else to handle the routing between that router and the device that you want to get the 192.x.x.x address.

Can I from the modem connect to a router that I set up the address from lets say 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 then connect that router to another router with a range of 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120 .254 , or will the dhcp 's of the routers fight ? Ideas , thanks people ( I have a issue that I need to fix )

 

[antharr]

I have the router (wrt 310n) set up for a internal address terfof 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120 .254 - can I add a address of 192.168.1.103 also ? or when a computer on the 42.xxx.xxx.xxx network is connected and types in 192.168.1.103 I can forward to that address ?

That's a different subnet and you would need something else to handle the routing between that router and the device that you want to get the 192.x.x.x address.

Can I from the modem connect to a router that I set up the address from lets say 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 then connect that router to another router with a range of 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120 .254 , or will the dhcp 's of the routers fight ? Ideas , thanks people ( I have a issue that I need to fix )

This will work.

 

[Total]

That's a different subnet and you would need something else to handle the routing between that router and the device that you want to get the 192.x.x.x address.

Can I from the modem connect to a router that I set up the address from lets say 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 then connect that router to another router with a range of 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120 .254 , or will the dhcp 's of the routers fight ? Ideas , thanks people ( I have a issue that I need to fix )

This will work.

I will need to keep the dhcp enabled on both routers ? correct ?

 

[acurasd]

Actually as long as it is on the same subnet... it should work

I have a three devices : 192.168.100.1 , 192.168.15.1, 192.168.2.1 and its on the same network and i can connect to those with any computer on the network

 

[Total]

Actually as long as it is on the same subnet... it should work

I have a three devices : 192.168.100.1 , 192.168.15.1, 192.168.2.1 and its on the same network and i can connect to those with any computer on the network

but my set up does not have the same subnet ???

 

[acurasd]

I am not sure. We aren't exactly looking at your router settings here.

Most home users will use: 255.255.255.0 that is what mines is on.

just double check your subnet on the routers...

 

[Total]

I am not sure. We aren't exactly looking at your router settings here.

Most home users will use: 255.255.255.0 that is what mines is on.

just double check your subnet on the routers...

the router 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120.254 has a subnet of 255.255.255.192 right now - so if I set the subnet on the 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 to 255.255.255.192 all should be good ?

 

[acurasd]

Its more of type and test..... its worth a shot...

but remember your old settings.... if the new ones doesn't work. Remember to put the old ones back and we will go back to square one.

 

[antharr]

I am not sure. We aren't exactly looking at your router settings here.

Most home users will use: 255.255.255.0 that is what mines is on.

just double check your subnet on the routers...

the router 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120.254 has a subnet of 255.255.255.192 right now - so if I set the subnet on the 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 to 255.255.255.192 all should be good ?

11111111.11111111.11111111.11000000<<<<<<leaves you 64 ip address on this subnet

192.168.1.2 - 192.168.1.62 would be your usable addresses with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask. Assuming you use your first usable 192.168.1.1 for the ip address on it's LAN side.

Also with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask on the 42.x.x.x subnet you will only have 42.242.120.193 - 42.242.120.254 as usable hosts.

 

[Total]

I am not sure. We aren't exactly looking at your router settings here.

Most home users will use: 255.255.255.0 that is what mines is on.

just double check your subnet on the routers...

the router 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120.254 has a subnet of 255.255.255.192 right now - so if I set the subnet on the 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 to 255.255.255.192 all should be good ?

11111111.11111111.11111111.11000000<<<<<<leaves you 64 ip address on this subnet

192.168.1.2 - 192.168.1.62 would be your usable addresses with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask. Assuming you use your first usable 192.168.1.1 for the ip address on it's LAN side.

Also with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask on the 42.x.x.x subnet you will only have 42.242.120.193 - 42.242.120.254 as usable hosts.

I see so the 42 router is correct , but can I have a larger range on the 192 router and will they still play nice together ? anyone ..

 

[antharr]

the router 42.242.120.195 to 42.242.120.254 has a subnet of 255.255.255.192 right now - so if I set the subnet on the 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 to 255.255.255.192 all should be good ?

11111111.11111111.11111111.11000000<<<<<<leaves you 64 ip address on this subnet

192.168.1.2 - 192.168.1.62 would be your usable addresses with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask. Assuming you use your first usable 192.168.1.1 for the ip address on it's LAN side.

Also with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask on the 42.x.x.x subnet you will only have 42.242.120.193 - 42.242.120.254 as usable hosts.

I see so the 42 router is correct , but can I have a larger range on the 192 router and will they still play nice together ? anyone ..

You will have only have 62 usable ip addresses on both if you use the 255.255.255.192 subnet. To get the range 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 you would have to use a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0.

 

[Total]

11111111.11111111.11111111.11000000<<<<<<leaves you 64 ip address on this subnet

192.168.1.2 - 192.168.1.62 would be your usable addresses with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask. Assuming you use your first usable 192.168.1.1 for the ip address on it's LAN side.

Also with a 255.255.255.192 subnet mask on the 42.x.x.x subnet you will only have 42.242.120.193 - 42.242.120.254 as usable hosts.

I see so the 42 router is correct , but can I have a larger range on the 192 router and will they still play nice together ? anyone ..

You will have only have 62 usable ip addresses on both if you use the 255.255.255.192 subnet. To get the range 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 you would have to use a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0.

both routers should play well together with different subset masks ?

 

[antharr]

I see so the 42 router is correct , but can I have a larger range on the 192 router and will they still play nice together ? anyone ..

You will have only have 62 usable ip addresses on both if you use the 255.255.255.192 subnet. To get the range 192.168.1.2 to 192,168.1.254 you would have to use a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0.

both routers should play well together with different subset masks ?

Yes. A routers main purpose is to allow devices on different networks to communicate.