Why has Firefox become so bad?

If I drive a car without ever doing basic maintenance like say changing oil and filters I can't possibly blame BMW or Dodge for building such unreliable cars.
As for your notions about chrome being wrongfully accused: Do you really think Google put a unique ID in each of their browsers because they were bored....or even that this has been done with the users best interest in mind?

Didn't think so.
Excuse me, I call it as I see it.
I'm just very pragmatic: If somebody enters a bank with a ski mask over their head I don't automatically assume they're having a winter social I didn't know about.

-DG
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP m8000n
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x86
CPU
DualCore AMD Athlon 64 X2, 2600 MHz 5200+
Motherboard
Asus M2N68-LA (Narra)
Memory
Samsung 2GB DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
Onboard NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Sound Card
Onboard nVIDIA nForce 6100-430 (MCP61P)
Monitor(s) Displays
Westinghouse 19" LED
Screen Resolution
1280x1024
Hard Drives
SATA II Seagate Barracuda 500GB
USB II WD Elements 500GB
USB II WD My Book 1TB
USB II WD My Book 2TB
PSU
Stock (HP)
Case
Stock (HP)
Cooling
Stock
Keyboard
Logitech Classic KB 200
Mouse
Standard HP opticle USB mouse
How about the fact that the OP has confirmed that their HDD is 0% fragmented, and that they use now toolbars, plugins or extensions but everyone keeps saying that it is the users fault because they use to many plugins and don't defrag their HDD or do other simple maintenance.

Also, you're reaching a lot on what you say about Chrome. Let me guess. MS makes a unique product ID on every computer with Windows to track everything you do one them.
 

My Computer

Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Toshiba P775-S7100
OS
Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit
CPU
Intel Core i5-2450M @2.5 GHz
Memory
6 GB DDR3 1333MHz
Graphics Card(s)
Intel HD 3000
Monitor(s) Displays
Built-in 17.3" LED; 22" Insignia NS-L22Q-10A
Screen Resolution
1600x900; 1360x768
Hard Drives
750 GB Hitachi
1TB Seagate FreeAgent External
Internet Speed
Verizon DSL Speed(Down/Up): 3360 Kbps / 800 Kbps
Antivirus
MSE and MBAM Pro
Browser
IE10
Well, the original poster is making a statement that Firefox has gotten bad and that seems to insinuate it must be that same way for everybody using it.

This is why some of us firefox users and responding back...because we aren't seeing or experiencing the same problems as the OP. Therefore, there must be something different about our setups.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self-Built in July 2009
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS
Memory
8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings
Graphics Card(s)
EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570
Sound Card
Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio
Monitor(s) Displays
23" Acer x233H
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS
PSU
Corsair 620HX modular
Case
Antec P182
Cooling
stock
Keyboard
ABS M1 Mechanical
Mouse
Logitech G9 Laser Mouse
Internet Speed
15/2 cable modem
Other Info
Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset.

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP Pavillion dv-7 1005 Tx
OS
Win 8 Release candidate 8400
CPU
[email protected]
Memory
4 gigs
Graphics Card(s)
Nvidia 9600M
Sound Card
HD built-in
Monitor(s) Displays
17" Wxga
Screen Resolution
1440x900
Cooling
none
Internet Speed
45Mb down 5Mb up
In my opinoin(and yes, it's just an opinion) I wouldn't say that anyone means bad as in "not good"
Why did I move away from FF? I loved FF years ago, it was great, flawless and fast. In my experience, it's not that FF has gotten bad really. It's just that I compare how FF3+ runs compared to the previous versions that I loved. I liked FF for the reason of speed, which, compared to what it used to be, simply isn't the same. I rarely ever used any extentions aside from the more important 2 or 3.

I have never actually had a real "problem" with FF3+ , it's just that it isn't the same. I still have FF3 as a backup since I use Opera as my main, but after messing with IE8 and now the 9 beta, I see no advantage of FF over IE at all, they're both comparably slow-ER, not necessarily slow.

On another note.....the plan to have extentions in Opera now kinda pisses me off. I always liked this browser because it was simple and fast.. I just worry that it's going to be another FF. Who knows, maybe i'll just go to IE9 when it finally arrives.

I did like FF4 beta a lo for the time I used it though.

EDIT: Also, don't say a word about switching to Chrome. Sick of google, don't trust Chrome, whether what is said is true or not. I won't ever touch it.
 
Last edited:

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Toshiba Satellite L455D
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium
CPU
Amd Semperon 2.10GHz
Memory
2 Gig
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon 3100
Sound Card
Realtek
Monitor(s) Displays
15.6 inch
Screen Resolution
1366x768
Hard Drives
250gig
Mouse
Logitech Wireless
Internet Speed
16/2 cable
Yeah, I'm not buying it either. I use FF as well without issue.

I am seeing a Chrome commercial here.

BTW, Google's real ethics are still in huge question.


Oh? Let's see. I shall quote myself from my first post.
Why has Firefox become so bad?

It's becoming more and more bloated and less like what it was intended to be (fast and functional) when it was first released to compete with IE.

It takes up insane amounts of ram memory. It also crashes so easily whenever the flash plugin crashes.

Compare it to another browser like Chrome and the consumption and stability differences are so vast, even though Chrome was created after Firefox.. Chrome consumes 1/5 as much memory, doesn't lag at all even when many tabs are open and doesn't crash at all even if its flash plugin crashes.

I hate to use Chrome over Firefox but it's proving to be superior to Firefox in the most important areas of memory consumption, lag speed and stability. Chrome has major problems ensuring that downloads do not become corrupted, which is a nail to its heart.

Firefox, please take care of the important core issues before fiddling around with issues concerning user-created plugin...

Moving on...
The first pic is how I see some people actually running FF.

The second was actually a joke pic by someone trying to see how many toolbars they could get installed at once. :)


Unless a person wants to tell someone, it is nobody else's business who they talk to, what they search for, what they read, what videos they watch, where they live, what they buy, where they're planning to go on vacation, what religion they have, their mother's maiden name, what political views they have ..I could go on ad infinitum.. If you have no privacy, you have no security. Therefore chrome has no security...
True. However, Chrome is the only stop-gap solution, which is fast, that I know of and have at the moment... until Firefox gets its frickin act back together. I hope Firefox does so soon.

but besides that fact.. chrome has been the #3 reason my xp-and-vista-using customers ended up with rouge AVs, trojans, spyware and other infestations. Malware in P2P downloads and IE were #1 and #2 respectively.
It's not chrome. It's the thing in between the keyboard and the chair. The thing within everyone of us.
Be thankful for that "thing" because it brings you customers. ;)

Until very recently (the past 15 days to be exact) Google has done absolutely nothing to protect people from malicious sites.
And Google doesn't have to. It's not a charity or your mom or dad. People have to learn to protect themselves or be taken advantage of for taking the easy way out and not bothering to learn.

And Chrome didn't force it upon those users or kill off all the other alternatives by assassination or something. People CHOSE to use Chrome.

If you admired an actress, would you blame the actress for turning your date offer down? You chose to admire her and she didn't kill off all the other women on the planet.

And besides that, benchmarks don't always reflect real world performance. It wouldn't matter if a browser could render a 50MB java app in 3 milliseconds if it crashes at least once every time you use it.
I don't care about milliseconds. I can't tell the difference between 2 milliseconds and 1 millisecond by counting. I don't care.

I only know that Chrome has never hanged on me YET... for the one month duration that I switched to it.

More importantly, Chrome has never crashed on me yet. I have never had to reopen Chrome because it stopped working and I had no other way of continuing to use Chrome other than to close it and then reopen it.

Though the flash plugin has crashed several times on Chrome, it doesn't cause Chrome to lag or hang while it crashed. That's what I care about.

I hate to use Chrome over Firefox but it's proving to be superior to Firefox in the most important areas of memory consumption, lag speed and stability. Chrome has major problems ensuring that downloads do not become corrupted, which is a nail to its heart.
No download issues for me, downloaded burnout paradise demo with out any issues, I swapped to chrome a few months back (great browser) IE 9 is better in my opinion than FF 3.6/4 beta
I noticed the Chrome's download issues when I did CRC checks.

One corrupted download is enough reason to distrust it's download capabilities because I've never had corrupted downloads when using Firefox to download small files of 100MB or less.
 
Last edited:

My Computer

OS
Windows 7 Pro
Why do have the people on this thread assume the user is to blame for his/her problem with firefox. You will find that a lot of people don't like firefox, which is why chrome has become as popular as it has in such a short time. A lot of people have problems with firefox running slowly or crashing regularly, even after deleting cookies, browsing data, and what have you. If you don't have problems, good for you, but don't assume everyone that does run into a problem is to blame, just like we don't like people blaming their problems on Bill Gates or Win7.

BTW can I see some secondary source stating that all your browsing data gets sent to google? I see people saying it, but no evidence for it. And chromes speed and reliability has a lot to do with the fact that it opens a new process for all tabs and plug-ins.
How about the fact that the OP has confirmed that their HDD is 0% fragmented, and that they use now toolbars, plugins or extensions but everyone keeps saying that it is the users fault because they use to many plugins and don't defrag their HDD or do other simple maintenance.

Also, you're reaching a lot on what you say about Chrome. Let me guess. MS makes a unique product ID on every computer with Windows to track everything you do one them.

Thanks for the reasonable and rational posts and satire. It was needed to ease the air.
I see that another person, whose judgement has a clear perspective is not clouded any hint of fanboyism. Note that I'm not insinuating that anyone who defends Firefox is a Firefox fanboy. Only those who fervently defend it without taking a step back to look at the whole picture are.

If I drive a car without ever doing basic maintenance like say changing oil and filters I can't possibly blame BMW or Dodge for building such unreliable cars.
As for your notions about chrome being wrongfully accused: Do you really think Google put a unique ID in each of their browsers because they were bored....or even that this has been done with the users best interest in mind?

Didn't think so.
Excuse me, I call it as I see it.
I'm just very pragmatic: If somebody enters a bank with a ski mask over their head I don't automatically assume they're having a winter social I didn't know about.

-DG
The car starts to degrade in performance within 1 month of buying it. Should I blame BMW or Dodge?
Hell Yes I should.

The reasonable expectation would be that it should stay in tip top condition for at least a year because all my other cars did so, including the previous car I bought from them.

Firefox starts lagging within a day... while it didn't use to.

I have a minimal level of standards set already, thanks to Firefox. (see rising expectations & relative deprivation) To add fuel to the fire, another browser like Chrome doesn't lag like Firefox.

I know firefox is free and I have no right to complain. But hey, I'm not giving nonconstructive complains like "F** this sucks"; I'm giving proper feedback about the causes of the problem.


Now, let's alter the car scenario a bit to tailor it to my case.

I'm smart enough to only use clean petrol, which doesn't damage my filters.
(think programs and AV software)

I also make sure I don't drive on bumpy lousy roads. Neither do I drift.
(think malicious websites, overclocking and other abuses of the PC)

I'm also smart enough to avoid parking my expensive car out on the road at night so that thieves won't get a chance to mess around with my car.
(think clicking on malicious links that have a stupid/unbelieveable promise)

As such, I only do a minimal amount of maintenance. It can't be my fault that the car starts to seriously degrade in performance within 1 month of buying it right?

Well, the original poster is making a statement that Firefox has gotten bad and that seems to insinuate it must be that same way for everybody using it.

This is why some of us firefox users and responding back...because we aren't seeing or experiencing the same problems as the OP. Therefore, there must be something different about our setups.
This is one of the best comments from the Firefox supporters and defenders.
I'm on the fence.

Well, the original poster is making a statement that Firefox has gotten bad and that seems to insinuate it must be that same way for everybody using it.
No I didn't insinuate it must be that same way for everybody using it. I didn't say anything along the lines of "everybody is having problems with firefox".
I'm sure that you can tell that the opinions were all mine. Mine!:geek:

Do I need to add a "for me" at the end of every sentence to make that crystal clear?
Didn't think so.

because we aren't seeing or experiencing the same problems as the OP. Therefore, there must be something different about our setups.
That might be the case. But what would it be?
None of you have mentioned anything about your setups.


In my opinoin(and yes, it's just an opinion) I wouldn't say that anyone means bad as in "not good"
Why did I move away from FF? I loved FF years ago, it was great, flawless and fast. In my experience, it's not that FF has gotten bad really. It's just that I compare how FF3+ runs compared to the previous versions that I loved. I liked FF for the reason of speed, which, compared to what it used to be, simply isn't the same. I rarely ever used any extentions aside from the more important 2 or 3.

I have never actually had a real "problem" with FF3+ , it's just that it isn't the same. I still have FF3 as a backup since I use Opera as my main, but after messing with IE8 and now the 9 beta, I see no advantage of FF over IE at all, they're both comparably slow-ER, not necessarily slow.

On another note.....the plan to have extentions in Opera now kinda pisses me off. I always liked this browser because it was simple and fast.. I just worry that it's going to be another FF. Who knows, maybe i'll just go to IE9 when it finally arrives.

I did like FF4 beta a lo for the time I used it though.
True... My sentiments though I didn't think of that when I was posting this.

EDIT: Also, don't say a word about switching to Chrome. Sick of google, don't trust Chrome, whether what is said is true or not. I won't ever touch it.
Chrome is the only stop-gap solution, which is fast, that I know of and have at the moment... until Firefox gets its frickin act back together. I hope Firefox does so soon.
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7 Pro
BTW, Google's real ethics are still in huge question.

There's no question - they have none.


In all honesty - who cares? There are plenty of options to choose from and when a once favourite browser loses it's appeal, switch to another. If a person doesn't like that, they can switch back later or try yet another one.

They're all as equally good/bad as each other in their own way.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Systems by SmartEyeball
OS
8 Pro x64
CPU
i7 3770K 4.6GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P8Z77 WS
Memory
16GB G.Skill Trident X 2666mhz
Graphics Card(s)
x2 EVGA 780 Ti Superclocked SLI
Sound Card
SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB / ATH-AD900 Headphones
Monitor(s) Displays
x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung
Screen Resolution
5760*1200/ 1920*1200
Hard Drives
2x Intel 520 240GB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0) * 2TB WD Caviar Black * Sony Optirac DVD
PSU
Silverstone Strider Evolution 1200W
Case
Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
Cooling
Noctua NH-D14
Keyboard
Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
Mouse
Thermaltake Theron (Highly Recommended) + Razer Imperator
Antivirus
MSE
Browser
IE, FF, WaterFox
Other Info
GT Extreme V2 Sim Racing Cockpit + 40" LCD and K/B Mouse stand ▼
Fanatec CSR Elite Wheel + Clubsport V1 Pedals + CSR shifter/7G-H ▼Saitek X52 Pro ▼ TrackIR 5 Pro
Buttkicker v2 Seat Rumbler with Dedicated 5.1 and Sub Woofer attached to frame ▼
=
Bloody Big Grin
Just because it fit's the topic and some users might not know that:
If you really want to run Chrome but would like to limit Google's Data mining a little, there are several solutions

#1 SWare IRON (based on Chromium minus the automatic data transmission to google Servers)
Install or portable version here: SRWare Iron - The Browser of the Future
downside: you'll be limited to their update cycles and it's based on Chromium (if that's a downside at all)

#2 a portable Version of Chrome from a german board which a working Updater (as a separat program)
the language can easily be switched and the Updater allows to switch between the latest Chrome version, the latest BETA, the latest DEV version and the latest Chromium

http://stadt-bremerhaven.de/download-manager.php?id=250

-DG
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP m8000n
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x86
CPU
DualCore AMD Athlon 64 X2, 2600 MHz 5200+
Motherboard
Asus M2N68-LA (Narra)
Memory
Samsung 2GB DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
Onboard NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Sound Card
Onboard nVIDIA nForce 6100-430 (MCP61P)
Monitor(s) Displays
Westinghouse 19" LED
Screen Resolution
1280x1024
Hard Drives
SATA II Seagate Barracuda 500GB
USB II WD Elements 500GB
USB II WD My Book 1TB
USB II WD My Book 2TB
PSU
Stock (HP)
Case
Stock (HP)
Cooling
Stock
Keyboard
Logitech Classic KB 200
Mouse
Standard HP opticle USB mouse

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
self build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU
Intel Core i7 4770K overclocked to 4.7GHz Quad Core Haswell
Motherboard
Asus Z87 Pro (Socket 1150) ATX Motherboard
Memory
16GB Team Group Vulcan Gold 2133MHz
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon HD 7880 Series Display adapter
Monitor(s) Displays
NEC LCD2690WUXi2
Screen Resolution
26" 1920 x 1200
Hard Drives
Samsung 500GB SSD 840 EVO SATA 6Gb/s
Samsung 250GB SSD 840 EVO SATA 6Gb/s
PSU
Corsair AX760 Platinum
Case
Cooler Master HAF X Gaming Tower
Cooling
XSPC RayStorm 750 RS360 Water cooling
Mouse
Razer Death Adder left handed
Internet Speed
126Mb download 11.5Mb up
Antivirus
Avast free
Browser
Opera
Other Info
Main Browser is Opera
Favorite software Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop
best plugins Nik software
Firewall : Private firewall 7
All the Firefox 4 versions pror to Firefox 4.0.b7 have been slow but the latest version seems fast enough.
Opera is another browser thats fast.

no they haven't, been faster if anything.
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7 Ultimate
Firefox is very easy to mess up, particularly when installing other browsers alongside it. I uninstalled all my browsers, except for IE, then reinstalled Firefox. I made sure all of them bits left from the uninstall were wiped as well. After doing this, Firefox ran great again.

Chrome is the fastest at executing JavaScript at the moment, but that position is always changing.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
iBuyPower Chimera X58
OS
Windows 8 Pro x64
CPU
Intel Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus P6T Deluxe V2
Memory
12GB (2GB x6) Triple Channel DDR3 1333 MHz
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB GDDR5
Sound Card
Integrated Digital HD 7.1 Surround Sound
Monitor(s) Displays
24.6-inch ASUS VW246H 20000:1 Contrast, 2 ms response time,
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
1 TB 7200 RPM SATA II 3 GBps 16MB cache
PSU
NZXT 800W Gaming Series
Case
Guardian Inferno (Custom Painted NZXT Guardian 921)
Cooling
Thermaltake V1 Fan Cooling System OC Proof
Keyboard
Razer Lycosa
Mouse
iBuyPower Ergonomical Internet Mouse
Internet Speed
11 MBps High-speed Cable
I recommend you use portable versions of browsers you'd like to test.
It wouldn't mess with your settings plus you could have as many parallel as you have HDD space :D

-DG
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP m8000n
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x86
CPU
DualCore AMD Athlon 64 X2, 2600 MHz 5200+
Motherboard
Asus M2N68-LA (Narra)
Memory
Samsung 2GB DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
Onboard NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Sound Card
Onboard nVIDIA nForce 6100-430 (MCP61P)
Monitor(s) Displays
Westinghouse 19" LED
Screen Resolution
1280x1024
Hard Drives
SATA II Seagate Barracuda 500GB
USB II WD Elements 500GB
USB II WD My Book 1TB
USB II WD My Book 2TB
PSU
Stock (HP)
Case
Stock (HP)
Cooling
Stock
Keyboard
Logitech Classic KB 200
Mouse
Standard HP opticle USB mouse
I recommend you use portable versions of browsers you'd like to test.
It wouldn't mess with your settings plus you could have as many parallel as you have HDD space :D
-DG

Thats what i do there are lots of advantages for portable software easy backup, always available if windows crashes. I haven't been able to think of any reason not to use Opera portable all the time now its part of the installer.

Firefox 4 b7 is a lot faster on my PC than previous 4 betas starting & loading tabs but the Peacekeeper scores have hardly changed.
And now I've found the
Hide Caption Titlebar Plus (Smart) 2.1.0 add on it will be useable on my laptop :)
 
Last edited:

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
self build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU
Intel Core i7 4770K overclocked to 4.7GHz Quad Core Haswell
Motherboard
Asus Z87 Pro (Socket 1150) ATX Motherboard
Memory
16GB Team Group Vulcan Gold 2133MHz
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon HD 7880 Series Display adapter
Monitor(s) Displays
NEC LCD2690WUXi2
Screen Resolution
26" 1920 x 1200
Hard Drives
Samsung 500GB SSD 840 EVO SATA 6Gb/s
Samsung 250GB SSD 840 EVO SATA 6Gb/s
PSU
Corsair AX760 Platinum
Case
Cooler Master HAF X Gaming Tower
Cooling
XSPC RayStorm 750 RS360 Water cooling
Mouse
Razer Death Adder left handed
Internet Speed
126Mb download 11.5Mb up
Antivirus
Avast free
Browser
Opera
Other Info
Main Browser is Opera
Favorite software Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop
best plugins Nik software
Firewall : Private firewall 7
I recommend you use portable versions of browsers you'd like to test.
It wouldn't mess with your settings plus you could have as many parallel as you have HDD space :D

-DG
What do you mean by portable version? There's a portable version of firefox released by mozilla?
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7 Pro
I mean portable like in "put it on a stick and use it wherever you go-portable" .:D ;)
And NO it's not released by mozilla but from a trusted supplier of portable Applications (PortableApps.com)
After all what's the big difference between install and portable versions?
It's not like that's a complete new program. Mainly a few config changes as to where to keep the profile/extensions and where/how to use the cache function.
Unzip to a directory of your choice instead of some installation process.
The main advantage is, that due to those config changes the browser wouldn't mess with the system default settings for browser/HTML protocol etc. To "uninstall" you just delete the folder it resides in and you're golden...no garbage leftover files, no superfluous registry entries.
I always have a portable version of almost every browser at hand :D

Get your actual last stable version here:
Mozilla Firefox, Portable Edition | v3.6.12

and your last Beta of the next branch here:
Mozilla Firefox, Portable Edition 4.0 Beta 7 and Gecko Layout Engine Test Versions | PortableApps.com - Portable software for USB drives

-DG
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP m8000n
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x86
CPU
DualCore AMD Athlon 64 X2, 2600 MHz 5200+
Motherboard
Asus M2N68-LA (Narra)
Memory
Samsung 2GB DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
Onboard NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Sound Card
Onboard nVIDIA nForce 6100-430 (MCP61P)
Monitor(s) Displays
Westinghouse 19" LED
Screen Resolution
1280x1024
Hard Drives
SATA II Seagate Barracuda 500GB
USB II WD Elements 500GB
USB II WD My Book 1TB
USB II WD My Book 2TB
PSU
Stock (HP)
Case
Stock (HP)
Cooling
Stock
Keyboard
Logitech Classic KB 200
Mouse
Standard HP opticle USB mouse
SledgeDG
"I mean portable like in "put it on a stick and use it wherever you go-portable"
If you do install to a USB Flash Drive (stick,thumb drive,compact flash card , Memory stick)
When you run it using a USB flash drive it will be very slow & only really good enough for checking a a few sites.
If you install it to a folder on your own or a friends hard drive you get full speed.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
self build
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU
Intel Core i7 4770K overclocked to 4.7GHz Quad Core Haswell
Motherboard
Asus Z87 Pro (Socket 1150) ATX Motherboard
Memory
16GB Team Group Vulcan Gold 2133MHz
Graphics Card(s)
ATI Radeon HD 7880 Series Display adapter
Monitor(s) Displays
NEC LCD2690WUXi2
Screen Resolution
26" 1920 x 1200
Hard Drives
Samsung 500GB SSD 840 EVO SATA 6Gb/s
Samsung 250GB SSD 840 EVO SATA 6Gb/s
PSU
Corsair AX760 Platinum
Case
Cooler Master HAF X Gaming Tower
Cooling
XSPC RayStorm 750 RS360 Water cooling
Mouse
Razer Death Adder left handed
Internet Speed
126Mb download 11.5Mb up
Antivirus
Avast free
Browser
Opera
Other Info
Main Browser is Opera
Favorite software Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop
best plugins Nik software
Firewall : Private firewall 7
I don't run it from a stick...I just use the stick for transportation purposes
If you're allowed to do so it surely makes sense to copy the whole folder to the computer first and then run it from there. That's basically self understood, isn't it.Only on PCs where you're not allowed to install/save anything to the local harddrive one would run it from the stick.

-DG
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP m8000n
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x86
CPU
DualCore AMD Athlon 64 X2, 2600 MHz 5200+
Motherboard
Asus M2N68-LA (Narra)
Memory
Samsung 2GB DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
Onboard NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Sound Card
Onboard nVIDIA nForce 6100-430 (MCP61P)
Monitor(s) Displays
Westinghouse 19" LED
Screen Resolution
1280x1024
Hard Drives
SATA II Seagate Barracuda 500GB
USB II WD Elements 500GB
USB II WD My Book 1TB
USB II WD My Book 2TB
PSU
Stock (HP)
Case
Stock (HP)
Cooling
Stock
Keyboard
Logitech Classic KB 200
Mouse
Standard HP opticle USB mouse
Firefox 3.612 is holding out well for me with a few extensions and a ton of bookmarked sites

I do backup my bookmarks on occasion

anyone know why embedded youtube videos cannot be seen though?

my flash appears to be up to date :huh:
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7
Back
Top