Thanks,
Paul Black. It's great to have something useful to share
Johnhoh: Cheers for that, I'll try that Intel GPU driver.
BTW, re Windows Updates, I've meant to say this before when I've seen discussions on the subject:
Windows updates aren't necessary. I'll qualify that: They aren't as necessary as many people think.
On what do I base this (heretical) statement? Simple: Building lots of systems and always turning off Windows Updates (and the Security Center) during the process. Consequently, because I usually rebuild my own systems every 2-3 years, my OS's would never be updated during that period. For my customer builds, I'm picking that some of them (probably most, actually), are still running W7 (or XP) systems that haven't been updated in 15-20 years. So I take MS's 'Windows Updates' admonitions with more than a grain of salt.
It's my belief, as a 30-year casual observer of the MS and Windows culture, that many MS 'essential-must have' fixes have been called up by ultra-conservative and geeky beta-testers and don't necessarily reflect the needs of the average user. You only have to read the description of each Windows Update to see what I mean.
Anyway, I don't want this to become a long, boring or controversial dissertation. I'm just saying that, in my experience, one can live without Windows Updates. Provided, I must add, that you begin with a system at first install, that is current. It would be foolish to install today, an untouched W7 ISO from 2012. Unless, of course, you follow the excellent advice from
SWI2 in his posts about
Simplix Updates, which would provide an excellent add-on to any base ISO, especially as the collections exclude, AFAIK, the most infamous of updates, i.e., telemetry et al.
Re my
transferring W7 from the old SATA drive to the new Samsung 970 NVME, it's occurred to me, as the Samsung drive is still in place on the 310 (but selected to be non-booting in the BIOS), I could just load something like Macrium Reflect onto the W7 drive and clone itself to the NVME. But I'm wondering if the NVME would then boot. The BIOS sees it okay, but as we know, the BIOS sees things that Windows doesn't. Anyone have thoughts on that?